IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 April 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100000312
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests removal of a memorandum, dated 20 December 2007, subject: Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT) Results, from her official military personnel file (OMPF).
2. The applicant states this memorandum is not authorized for filing in the OMPF.
3. The applicant provides a copy of the memorandum and a copy of her Enlisted Record Brief, dated 24 March 2010, in support of her request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is a Regular Army staff sergeant who enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 April 2002 and holds military occupational specialty 31B (Military Police). She continues to serve through multiple reenlistments and is currently assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, MO.
2. Her OMPF contains a copy of a memorandum, dated 20 December 2007, issued by the Education Center, Fort Polk, LA, showing she took the AFCT on 6 December 2007 and received her scores.
3. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) governs the composition of the OMPF and states, in pertinent part, that the performance section is used for filing performance, commendatory, and disciplinary data. Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file. The document will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by certain agencies, to include this Board. Only those documents listed in Tables 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) and 2-2 (Obsolete or No Longer Used Documents) are authorized for filing in the OMPF. AFCT Results are not listed in either of those Tables.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The evidence of record shows her OMPF contains a memorandum of her AFCT scores that is not required to be filed on her OMPF. Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to remove this document.
BOARD VOTE:
__ _X___ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the memorandum, dated 20 December 2007, subject: Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT) Results, from her OMPF.
_________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000312
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000312
2
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000018
She also states these documents were authenticated with signatures and filed in her OMPF. Documents in the restricted portion are those that must be permanently kept to: (1) maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; and corrections to other parts of the OMPF; (2) record investigation reports; (3) record appellate actions; and (4) protect the interest of the Soldier and the Army. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021448
The applicant requests removal of the general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) from her official military personnel file (OMPF) or transfer of the GOMOR from the performance section to the restricted section of her OMPF. The applicant states that continued filing of the GOMOR in the performance section of her OMPF is unjust. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the GOMOR, dated 24 August...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011903
(b) I understand that the AFQT score I receive from this AFCT will be counted as my final AFQT score of record, for which my continued eligibility will be determined. Eligibility for the NPSEB required a score of 31 or higher to receive the incentive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant was granted an ETP to accept the $20,000 NPSEB offered at the time of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028459
The applicant requests: * transfer the original disqualification for Good Conduct Medal memorandum, dated 5 July 2007, from the performance to the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) * removal of the duplicate disqualification for Good Conduct Medal memorandum, dated 5 July 2007, from his OMPF 2. It is unknown whether the applicant's commander referred the disqualification memorandum to the applicant according to Army Regulation 600-37. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015853
Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of Army Regulation 600-8-104 shows that promotion orders are filed in the service section of the OMPF. However, a review of the applicants OMPF revealed that the orders that promoted the applicant to SSG with an effective date of 1 December 2007 are not filed in the applicants OMPF. The evidence of record shows these orders were erroneously published as the applicant was promoted to SSG effective and with a DOR of 1 December 2007.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006492
A review of her OMPF reveals the DA Form 2627 is filed in the performance section of her OMPF. On 22 March 2007, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denied her request to transfer the Article 15 to the restricted section of her OMPF. The decision to file the original DA Form 2627 in the performance section or restricted section of the OMPF will be made by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016150
Her senior brigade commander recommended that the GOMOR be filed in her OMPF and a show cause board be initiated. A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. However, the evidence shows both the applicant's chain of command and the Pathfinder School conducted investigations into this matter and concluded that she failed to achieve course standards and she should not have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018530
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100018530 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of permanent orders awarding her the Parachutist Badge from her official military personnel file (OMPF). There is no harm to the Army or to the Soldier if the orders awarding her the Parachutist Badge and the revocation orders are removed from her OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013126
The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to remove from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting separation based upon conscientious objection, dated 3 March 2004, and the allied documents, including documents related to the original decision made by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant states the ABCMR concluded that the conscientious objection application was properly filed in the service...