Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015853
Original file (20080015853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  9 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015853 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the duplicate promotion orders that are filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his promotion points were incorrectly recorded on the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), Promotion List when he made the cut-off score for promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6 in December 2007.  As a result, his promotion orders had to be published locally.  Consequently, his name remained on the HQDA Promotion List and promotion orders were generated for the next month and also added to his OMPF.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, 478th Personnel Services Detachment, Bagram, Afghanistan, Orders 07-331-07, dated 24 November 2007 and Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Fort Hood, Texas, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military service records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 31 August 1999 and entered active duty in the Regular Army (RA) on 22 September 1999.  Upon completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 68A (Medical Equipment Repairer).  The applicant was promoted to the grade of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 on 1 May 2007.  On 28 November 2007, he reenlisted in the RA for a period of 3 years.
2.  The HQDA, Enlisted Distribution and Assignment System shows the applicant was promoted to the grade of SSG with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 December 2007.

3.  A review of the applicant's OMPF revealed that a copy of Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007, is filed in the service section of his OMPF.  This order shows that the applicant was promoted from SGT to SSG in primary MOS 68A3O00YY effective and with a DOR of 1 January 2008.  This order also shows the authority for this promotion was Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 3-34, and 
AHRC-MSP-E memorandum, dated 20 December 2007, subject:  DA Promotion Point Cut-Off Scores for 1 January 2008 and Junior Enlisted Issues.

4.  The review of the applicant’s OMPF failed to show any other orders promoting the applicant from SGT to SSG.  In addition, there are no orders showing that Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order
362-02, dated 28 December 2007, was revoked.

5.  In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents.

   a.  Headquarters, 478th Personnel Services Detachment, Bagram, Afghanistan, Orders 07-331-07, dated 24 November 2007.  This order shows that the applicant was promoted from SGT to SSG, in primary MOS 68A3O00YY, effective and with a DOR of 1 December 2007.  This order also shows the authority for this promotion was Army Regulation 600-8-19 and U.S. Army Human Resources Command, memorandum, dated 14 November 2007, subject:  DA Promotion Point Cut-Off Scores for 1 December 2007.

   b.  Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007.  This order shows that the applicant was promoted from SGT to SSG in primary MOS 68A3O00YY effective and with a DOR of 1 January 2008.  This order also shows the authority for this promotion was Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 3-34, and AHRC-MSP-E memorandum, dated 20 December 2007, subject:  DA Promotion Point Cut-Off Scores for 1 January 2008 and Junior Enlisted Issues.  (This order is filed in the service section of the applicant’s OMPF.)

6.  In connection with the processing of this case, coordination was made with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Military Pay Operations, DFAS-Indianapolis Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.  This coordination confirmed that the pay effective date of the applicant’s promotion to the grade of SSG was 1 December 2007.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the OMPF.  This document states that only those documents listed in Table 2-1 and 
Table 2-2 are authorized for filing in the OMPF.  Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the OMPF in one of three sections:  performance, service, or restricted.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.  When discovered by the custodian or requested by the Soldier concerned, transfer documents mistakenly filed in the performance or service section to the restricted section of the OMPF.  Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of Army Regulation 600-8-104 shows that promotion orders are filed in the service section of the OMPF.

8.  Paragraph 2-3 (Composition of the OMPF) of Army Regulation 600-8-104 provides, in pertinent part, that the restricted section of the OMPF is used for historical data that may normally be improper for viewing by selection boards or career managers.  The release of information in this section is controlled.  It may not be released without written approval from the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (for enlisted Soldiers, formerly designated as Headquarters, U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center) or the HQDA selection board proponent.  This paragraph also provides that documents in the restricted section of the OMPF are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; show corrections to other parts of the OMPF; record investigation reports and appellate actions; and protect the interests of the Soldier and the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that the promotion orders with an effective date of 1 January 2008 that are filed in his OMPF should be removed because they were erroneously published after he had already been promoted to the grade of SSG effective 1 December 2007.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was promoted from SGT to SSG effective and with a DOR of 1 December 2007.  However, a review of the applicant’s OMPF revealed that the orders that promoted the applicant to SSG with an effective date of 1 December 2007 are not filed in the applicant’s OMPF.  Therefore, a copy of Headquarters, 478th Personnel Services Detachment, Orders 07-331-07, dated 24 November 2007, should be filed in the service section of the applicant’s OMPF.


3.  A review of the applicant’s OMPF revealed that orders that promoted the applicant to SSG effective and with a DOR of 1 January 2008 are filed in the service section of the applicant’s OMPF.  The evidence of record shows these orders were erroneously published as the applicant was promoted to SSG effective and with a DOR of 1 December 2007.  Therefore, Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007, should be revoked and transferred to the restricted section of the applicant’s OMPF in order to maintain an unbroken, historical record of corrections made to the applicant’s OMPF and to protect the interests of both the Soldier and the Army.

4.  As a result of the above corrections, the applicant’s OMPF will accurately show the circumstances and events pertaining to the applicant’s promotion to SSG.  By regulation, once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.  When discovered by the custodian or requested by the Soldier concerned, documents mistakenly filed in the performance or service section will be transferred to the restricted section of the OMPF.  In order to remove the document in question from the OMPF, there must be clear and convincing evidence showing that the document is untrue or unjust.  In that regard, insufficient evidence has been provided in this case.  Therefore, the document in question should not be removed from the applicant’s OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  filing a copy of Headquarters, 478th Personnel Services Detachment, 
Orders 07-331-07, dated 24 November 2007, in the service section of the applicant’s OMPF;

     b.  issuing orders that revoke Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007;

     c.  filing a copy of the orders that revoke Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007, in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF; and

     d.  transferring Headquarters, 1st Medical Brigade, 13th Corps Support Command, Order 362-02, dated 28 December 2007, to the restricted section of the applicant’s OMPF.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to removing the promotion orders from the applicant’s OMPF.




      ___________X______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015853



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015853



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018591

    Original file (20130018591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests promotion to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 2012. This list contains her name and stated, "The following have been selected for promotion for 1 March 2012. The evidence of record confirms the applicant made the by-name promotion list to SGT on 1 March 2012 and, based on her own admission, she was not promoted at that time because she was flagged pending an investigation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019751

    Original file (20120019751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum from her previous unit commander, recommending she receive 150 duty performance points for her battalion's June 2010 semi-centralized promotion board * the supporting documentation that substantiates her promotion board administrative points * a memorandum from the President of the Board, Headquarters, Special Troops Battalion, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, dated 2 June 2010, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and Staff...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016275

    Original file (20080016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SSG on 1 September 2002. He was accordingly scheduled to attend BNCOC; however, due to his surgery, he requested a deferment in July 2003 of his August 2003 BNCOC class. However, he provided no evidence to show he informed anyone between November 2003 and August 2004 (when he deployed) that he was medically cleared to attend BNCOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015805

    Original file (20100015805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * he wasn’t promoted in a timely manner due to administrative errors * he made cut-off promotion points score of 350 on 8 August 1999, 1 October 2007, and 1 January 2009 in MOS 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist) * his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows his promotion points was 350 on 8 August 1999 * Installation Management Command (IMCOM) reviewed his records and didn’t see any flags, adverse actions or a promotion bar 3. His service record does not indicate he was recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018041

    Original file (20140018041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's previous request for removal a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 20 August 2013, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Counsel provides: * DA Form 2627 * DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigation Officer (IO)/Board of Officers) * Certificate of Promotion, dated 1 March 2013 * two orders * a Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012927

    Original file (20130012927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 1 November 1968, that shows the Executive Officer, Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade, recommended the applicant for promotion to SSG (E-6). Specifically, there is no evidence the applicant appeared before a promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion by the board, and placed on the E-6 promotion list. c. Therefore, based on the evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017341

    Original file (20090017341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that an Enlisted STAB denied the applicant's request to remove the DA QMP bar to reenlistment and that an Enlisted Special Review Board denied his request to remove the relief for cause NCOER. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 to show he was retired from active duty in the rank of SSG/pay grade E-6 with an effective date of pay grade of 1 August 1993. A letter from the applicant to DFAS, dated 12 May 2009, in which he stated that he retired from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002900

    Original file (20150002900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by – * removing a Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) * replacing the NCOER with the NCOER previously prepared by the rater and senior rater * crediting him with completing 26 years of active Federal service (AFS) * promoting him to the rank of master sergeant (MSG)/pay grade E-8 with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 1990 * placing him on the retired list in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005969

    Original file (20080005969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The advisory official adds the Promotions/Notifications Branch promotes officers based on the information provided to them by the units and the applicant received the earliest date possible according to the information provided by the unit. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank of LTC, effective and with a DOR of 8 January 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014417

    Original file (20110014417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was selected for promotion to MAJ by the FY08 promotion board. On 31 March 2010, he was informed that the endorsement had not been signed and that he was removed from the promotion list. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ by the FY08 MAJ promotion board.