Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061185C070421
Original file (2001061185C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061185

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Change of his reentry (RE) code from 4 to an acceptable one.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was discharged under the Voluntary Separation Program during the Reduction in Force. He had no disciplinary problems and his record shows this. Supporting evidence is as listed on the DD Form 149.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 March 1979. He was promoted to Staff Sergeant, E-6 on 1 June 1986.

By memorandum dated 26 September 1995, the applicant was notified that he had been determined to be barred from reenlistment under the Department of the Army Qualitative Management Program (QMP). The documents that led to his bar are not identified in the available records. The evidence of record shows that he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on 2 March 1993 for driving while intoxicated. His noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) for the period ending February 1993 contained several negative comments about his personal conduct off duty and his NCOER for the period ending March 1995 contains several negative comments about his off duty conduct.

On 12 October 1995, the applicant elected not to submit an appeal and understood that he would be separated within 90 days as of the date of his option statement.

On 5 January 1996, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, reduction in force. He was given a separation code (SPD) of JCC and an RE code of 4.

Army Regulation 601-280, chapter 10 at the time set forth policy and prescribed procedures for denying reenlistment under the QMP. This program is based on the premise that reenlistment is a privilege for those whose performance, conduct, attitude, and potential for advancement meet Army standards. It is designed to (1) enhance the quality of the career enlisted force, (2) selectively retain the best qualified soldiers to 30 years of active duty, (3) deny reenlistment to nonprogressive and nonproductive soldiers, and (4) encourage soldiers to maintain their eligibility for further service. The QMP consists of two major subprograms, the qualitative retention subprogram and the qualitative screening subprogram. Under the qualitative screening subprogram, records for grades


E-5 through E-9 are regularly screened by the DA promotion selection boards. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to determine if continued service is warranted. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. At the time paragraph 16-8 directed the early release of soldiers with a QMP bar to reenlistment when budgetary or authorization limitations required a reduction in enlisted strength.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE-4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

Army Regulation 635-5-1, SPD/Reentry Code Cross-Reference Table states that RE code 4 will be used when a soldier is discharged under the QMP.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was not separated under an enlisted voluntary separation program. He was identified for a Department of the Army QMP bar to reenlistment. He elected not to appeal the bar and he was discharged. His administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights. The reentry code of 4 is correct for the reason he separated.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo___ __rks___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061185
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065842C070421

    Original file (2001065842C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The applicant’s military records were screened by the 1995 Master Sergeant Selection/Sergeant QMP Board and he was properly identified for a DA bar to reenlistment under the QMP in accordance with AR 601-280.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507699C070209

    Original file (9507699C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to determine if continued service is warranted. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063973C070421

    Original file (2001063973C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 November 1985. The applicant’s separation authority on his DD Form 214 was listed as “to be determined.” The conversion of the QMP from a Headquarters Department of the Army bar to reenlistment to a Headquarters Department of the Army administrative separation program was approved around early 1998. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707405C070209

    Original file (9707405C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005901C070205

    Original file (20060005901C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Calendar Year 1991 Master Sergeant Selection Board reviewed the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and determined that he would be barred from reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). On 31 January 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 16, by reason of reduction in authorized force – qualitative early transition program. At the time of his discharge the applicant had completed 10 years,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609758C070209

    Original file (9609758C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given a separation code of “KGH, and a reentry code of “3.” He had completed a total of 9 years, 1 month, and 26 days active military service, and 2 years, 8 months, and 21 days inactive military service. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. Based on the applicant’s selection of Option 2 when he was notified of the DA bar to reenlistment, he should have been involuntarily discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707405

    Original file (9707405.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077997C070215

    Original file (2002077997C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In his next NCOER covering the period from October 1999 through February 2000, he received the same ratings and the supporting comments indicate he failed to put mission above personal affairs, has had lots of unaccountable time, he failed to take a APFT despite numerous opportunities to do so, has not gained in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004575

    Original file (20090004575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 January 1989, a memorandum was dispatched to the applicant informing him that the Calendar Year 1988 Sergeant First Class Board reviewed his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and determined that he was to be barred from reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basis authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Inasmuch as the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510381C070209

    Original file (9510381C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP) be set aside and that he be allowed to reenlist to complete his military career. The applicant’s records went before the Calendar Year 1993 Sergeant First Class/ANCOC Promotion/Selection Board. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.