Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021694
Original file (20090021694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021694 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was injured by a booby trap in January 1969.  He states he was treated at a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital unit for the injury and believes the records were lost.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 July 1967.  He completed initial entry training, was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 25 February 1968 to 24 February 1969.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 25 February 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 1 day of creditable active service.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank.

7.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

8.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he was ever wounded or treated for wounds sustained as the result of hostile action.

9.  The applicant's records do not contain any evidence that indicates he was ever awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority while serving on active duty.
 
10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was injured by a booby trap while in the Republic of Vietnam.  However, there is neither evidence in his available military personnel records nor any corroborating evidence provided by him which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, or that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
2.  The applicant's DA Form 20 does not show that the applicant was wounded and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

3.  In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021694



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021694



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001659

    Original file (20110001659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. He adds that he has provided additional forms to show he was assigned to the unit, the daily report showing eleven casualties, and orders awarding the Purple Heart to eight of the eleven wounded. In the absence of evidence he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wounds, and that it was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025055

    Original file (20100025055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Along with the letter are orders awarding him and another Soldier the Purple Heart for wounds incurred on 1 July 1970. The applicant's military records are very complete, having orders for all the awards listed on his DD Form 214. While it is clear that the applicant was involved in the booby trap blast, in the absence of evidence to show the applicant received medical treatment for a wound incurred as a result of hostile action and that treatment was made a matter of record, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004671

    Original file (20090004671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on or about from 23 September 1968 to on or about 19 August 1969. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. _______XXX ___ ______ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000425

    Original file (20100000425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The document provided clearly identifies the applicant and shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound that he received from a booby trap on 12 July 1968. c. Despite the absence of any additional evidence in the applicant's military personnel records, it is concluded that the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003538C070205

    Original file (20060003538C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no medical records available which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. There is no reason to doubt the statements provided by the applicant’s former platoon leader, rifleman, and medic; however, without medical evidence verifying the applicant's wounding, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case. As a result, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022411

    Original file (20110022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states after caring for the seriously injured point-man the applicant was treated by the field medic for what seemed to be cuts, abrasions, and minor shrapnel wounds. The applicant was injured but he would not go and get checked out by the medic. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that conclusively shows he was injured as a result of hostile action and treated for that injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022017

    Original file (20120022017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009471

    Original file (20080009471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 of the applicant’s DD Forms 214 do not show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in his available service personnel records which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of a Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004930

    Original file (20110004930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Forms 20 does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010087

    Original file (20100010087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical records are available for review with this case but none of the medical documents show he was wounded in action or treated for a combat wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action...