Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021357
Original file (20090021357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  1 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021357 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he served in the 37th Medical Company in support of A Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Combat Regiment (1/11th ACR).

3.  The applicant provides a newspaper article concerning President Obama awarding A Troop, 1/11th ACR the PUC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in the Army on 3 July 1969, was awarded the military occupational specialty of medical specialist, served in Vietnam from 5 December 1969 to 4 December 1970, and was promoted to pay grade E-5.  While in Vietnam the applicant served as a litter bearer with the 37th Medical Company from 8 December 1969 to 6 May 1970, and then as a troop aid man with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop (HHT), 1/11th ACR.

2.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 2 July 1971.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 has already been amended twice by the issuance of two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) on 30 December 1999 and 25 October 2004.
4.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, shows that the 1/11th ACR was awarded the PUC for the period 11 May to 2 June 1968 by Department of the Army General Order 45, dated 1969.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, stated that a DD Form 214 may be reissued only when:

	a.  directed by proper appellate authority, Executive Order, or by the Secretary of the Army;

	b.  it is determined that the corrections to be made will not fit with the correction block of a single DD Form 215;

	c.  two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required; or

	d.  the character of service is to be changed.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5, then in effect, directed, in pertinent part, that when a DD Form 214 is administratively issued or reissued the entry: “DD Form 214 administratively issued/reissued on (date).” is to be made on all copies unless the appellate authority, Executive Order, or the Secretary of the Army directive specifies otherwise.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 confirms the applicant's unit was awarded the PUC when he was assigned to that unit.  As such, he is entitled to have that unit citation added to his DD Form 214.

2.  However, since the applicant has already been issued two DD Forms 215 for his DD Form 214, he must be issued a new DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records as recommended below.


BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  reissuing a new DD Form 214;

	b.  showing that the applicant is entitled to the PUC for his service is 1/11th ACR; and

	c.  adding the entry: “DD Form 214 administratively issued/reissued on (date)” in Item 18, Remarks.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021357





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021357



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010200

    Original file (20120010200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided the following documents: a. letter, dated 11 March 2012, from a former Senior Medic for Troop G, 2nd Squadron, 11th ACR, who states the applicant left Blackhorse base camp with Troop G on or about 26 May 1969. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a medical personnel MOS and he served as an ambulance orderly and medical aidman with the 37th Medical Company and Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 2nd Squadron, 11th ACR in Vietnam. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008204

    Original file (20130008204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 January 1968. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart * Combat Medical Badge * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015520

    Original file (20110015520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 11th ACR, General Orders Number 32, dated 13 March 1969, contained in his official military personnel records, show he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 25 February 1969. His military personnel records do not contain any general orders awarding him the third award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) is awarded to individuals who have completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002091

    Original file (20110002091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he did not receive the Combat Medical Badge because he departed Vietnam unexpectedly on emergency leave in late June 1969. The applicant's military personnel record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the Combat Medical Badge. However, there are no orders or any other Army records that show the applicant was awarded the Combat Medical Badge, or that he was recommended for the badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012820

    Original file (20090012820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the PUC is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in addition to the awards already shown on his DD Form 214 he is also authorized the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012006

    Original file (20120012006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * these awards were never entered in his records * he was assigned to the U.S. Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV) Advisory Team 4 and this unit was cited for the PUC * he was assigned to the 37th Signal Battalion and this unit was cited for the MUC * the U.S. MACV was cited for the MUC during the period 1965 to 1967 * his records were corrected to reflect the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation but not the "Republic of Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019472

    Original file (20100019472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * any and all decorations awarded to F Troop, 2nd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR) 2. Item 38...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010709

    Original file (20140010709.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) by adding the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Presidential Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge (2nd Award) and any other authorized awards 2. There is no available evidence that the applicant is authorized the Presidential Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004475

    Original file (20120004475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. Army Regulation 635-5 states " all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized " will be shown on DD Form 214. Therefore, the entry in item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 October 1972 should read the: * Silver Star (2nd Award) * Purple Heart (2nd Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008445

    Original file (20070008445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of two Purple Hearts, the Combat Infantryman Badge, two Presidential Unit Citations, the Bronze Star Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. However, there are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded a second Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...