Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020673
Original file (20090020673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  6 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020673 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his first name be corrected to read Charlie instead of Charles on his orders and certificate for his third Meritorious Service Medal.  In addition, he requests the orders and certificate be corrected to read "Meritorious Service Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster."

2.  The applicant states he has been awarded three awards of the Meritorious Service Medal and his given first name is Charlie not Charles.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* a letter, dated 16 October 2009, from U.S. Army Tank - Automotive and Armaments Command, Philadelphia, PA
* a memorandum, dated 30 October 1997, from U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO
* his orders and certificate for award of the Meritorious Service Medal for the period 10 July 1986 through 9 July 1996
* his orders and certificate for award of the Meritorious Service Medal for the period from 1 October 1979 through 31 August 1981
* his orders and certificate for award of the Meritorious Service Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster for the period 1 September 1982 through 
1 September 1985


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 10 June 1968 and he continued to serve in the USAR and the Army National Guard until his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 9 July 1996.

3.  Headquarters, 80th Division (Training), USAR, Richmond, VA Permanent Orders 6-4, dated 11 March 1982, awarded the applicant the Meritorious Service Medal for meritorious service during the period 1 October 1979 - 31 August 1981.  He is identified with the first name Charlie and the social security number (SSN) ***-**1051.   The certificate for this award identifies him with the first name as Charlie.

4.  Headquarters, 80th Division (Training), USAR, Richmond, VA Permanent Orders 25-1, dated 9 December 1985, awarded the applicant the Meritorious Service Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster for meritorious service during the period 1 September 1982 - 1 September 1985.  He is identified with the first name Charlie and the SSN ***-**1051.   The certificate for this award indicates First Oak Leaf Cluster and identifies him with the first name as Charlie.

5.  Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, Washington DC Permanent Orders #226-45, dated 15 October 1997, awarded the applicant the Meritorious Service Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster for outstanding meritorious service during the period 15 July 1986 - 9 July 1996.  He is identified with the first name Charles and the SSN ***-**-1051. The certificate for this award does not show any Oak Leaf Clusters and identifies him with the first name as Charles.


6.  The applicant is identified throughout his official military file (OMPF) with the first name Charlie and the SSN ***-**-1051.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his orders and certificate for his third award of the Meritorious Service Medal should show his first name as Charlie instead of Charles.  He also contends the order and certificate should show this to be his third award (Second Oak Leaf Cluster) of the Meritorious Service Medal.

2.  The applicant is identified on two previous awards of the Meritorious Service Medal and throughout his OMPF with the first name of Charlie.   The two previous sets of orders for the award of the Meritorious Service Medal and the orders dated 15 October 1997 show his SSN as ***-**-1051.  Therefore, the third set of orders is clearly for the same individual and should reflect the award of the Meritorious Service Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster and show his first name as Charlie.

3.  The applicant's Meritorious Service Medal Certificate for the period 10 July 1986 - 9 July 1996 should read "Meritorious Service Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster" and his first name should be shown as Charlie.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Correcting Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, Washington DC Permanent Orders #226-45, dated 15 October 1997, to award him the Meritorious Service Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster and to show his first name as Charlie

* Reissuing his Meritorious Service Medal Certificate for the period 10 July 1986 - 9 July 1996 to read "Meritorious Service Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster" and to show his first name as Charlie



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020673



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020673



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015431

    Original file (20130015431.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows his SSN as listed on his DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) and his awards as the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Parachutist Badge * Combat Infantryman Badge * Bronze Star Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal 7. In support of his request, he provided copies of the following Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division General Orders: * Number 8094, dated 23 June 1969, showing he was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000825C070205

    Original file (20060000825C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of a proper award authority for this decoration, the applicant may request a third award of the Bronze Star Medal under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code. Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 10444, dated 23 October 1970, show the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080050C070215

    Original file (2002080050C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant's service, provided that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, the DA Form 1051 was not signed by a medical officer and it does not indicate that the applicant was a battle casualty or that his injury was the result of hostile actions or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010159

    Original file (20090010159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the third award of the Meritorious Service Medal was not recorded on his DD Form 214. Permanent Orders 76-4, Headquarters, Sixth United States Army, dated 27 June 1980, awarded the applicant the Meritorious Service Medal with first oak leaf cluster for meritorious service during the period from 4 July 1977 to 21 April 1980. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these two awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007424C070206

    Original file (20050007424C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he completed the Motor Sergeant Course in 1985. Therefore, there is no need to correct his DD Form 214 to show these courses. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064859C070421

    Original file (2001064859C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted the award certificate provided by the applicant for the Army Commendation Medal (3rd Oak Leaf Cluster). However, his records do not contain a recommendation for a fourth award of the Army Commendation Medal or General Orders which authorize a fourth award of the Army Commendation Medal. Based on General Orders present in the applicant’s records, he is entitled to three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, one of which was awarded with a “V” Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016456

    Original file (20100016456.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the following: * The awards were received while he was on active duty, but he did not obtain appropriate documentation until after he was discharged * He received his first award of the AAM in 1984 and it is reflected on his DD Form 214 for that period of service * He received his second award of the AAM in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) in 1996, but he was not issued a DD Form 214 to reflect this award * He received his third award of the AAM in 2005, but the DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013604

    Original file (20130013604.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During the applicant's period of service from 3 August 1967 to 1 August 1969, Soldiers were primarily identified using an Army service number (ASN). His DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 27 July 2011, shows he was awarded or authorized the: * Bronze Star Medal (3rd Award) * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * National Defense Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084708C070212

    Original file (2003084708C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Based on the foregoing, the Chief of the Military Awards Branch recommended that the applicant's request should be denied, that he should receive the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) approved by the Commanding General of the 5th Signal Command on 9 May 2002, and that the applicant's servicing personnel center should correct his official records to show this award. COL R, as the Chief of Staff and Headquarters Commandant of the 5th Signal Command at that time, indicated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026167

    Original file (20100026167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Army Reserves does not update a DD Form 214 from past active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request to add these awards on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 January 1966.