| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Hubert S. Shaw, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests correction of his records to show the Army Commendation Medal with three bronze oak leaf clusters, correctly known as the Army Commendation Medal (Third Oak Leaf Cluster).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (Third Oak Leaf Cluster). In support of his application, he provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), a partially legible copy of a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), and a copy of an award certificate for award of the “Army Commendation Medal (3rd OAK LEAF CLUSTER).”
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 26 August 1969 and completed training as a field artillery crewman. He served in Vietnam from 21 January 1970 through 22 November 1970 and again from 1 November 1971 through 19 April 1972. The applicant was honorably separated from active duty on 20 April 1972.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows entitlement to only one award of the Army Commendation Medal.
6. The DD Form 215 issued by the Army Review Boards Agency Support Division in St. Louis, Missouri, shows, among several corrections, award of the “Army Commendation Medal W/1 OLC and “V” Device” [Army Commendation Medal with One Oak Leaf Cluster and with “V” Device].
7. The applicant’s service personnel records contain 25th Division General Orders Number 7751, dated 14 July 1970, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device for heroism in action on 16 June 1970.
8. The applicant’s records also contain 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 8143, dated 25 July 1970, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious achievement for the period 1 May 1970 to 30 June 1970.
9. The applicant’s records also contain Headquarters 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, General Orders Number 870, dated 21 March 1973, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period August 1971 to April 1972.
10. There are no other orders in the applicant’s records which entitle him to additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the bronze “V” device indicates acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy and authorizes the bronze “V” device in conjunction with awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal.
13. The bronze oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the Army Commendation Medal.
14. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. In pertinent part, this regulation states that for U.S. military decorations the only acceptable source documentation is the order, letter, or memorandum which awards the decoration. Award certificates, citations, or separation certificates alone will not be the basis for entry of a decoration. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge) alone should not be the sole basis for recording a decoration. This document may be used to initially enter a decoration; however, if the validity of the award on the DD 214 is questioned or challenged, the only acceptable proof of award of the decorations will be the order, letter, or memorandum which awarded the decoration.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Orders show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device.
2. Orders show the applicant subsequently received a second award of the Army Commendation Medal correctly identified in General Orders as the Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster).
3. Orders show the applicant received a third award of the Army Commendation Medal which was not properly identified in General Orders as the Army Commendation Medal (Second Oak Leaf Cluster).
4. The Board noted the award certificate provided by the applicant for the Army Commendation Medal (3rd Oak Leaf Cluster). However, his records do not contain a recommendation for a fourth award of the Army Commendation Medal or General Orders which authorize a fourth award of the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the award certificate was in error and not sufficient as a basis for a fourth award of the Army Commendation Medal or the Army Commendation Medal (Third Oak Leaf Cluster).
5. Based on General Orders present in the applicant’s records, he is entitled to three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, one of which was awarded with a “V” Device. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (Second Oak leaf Cluster) with “V” Device.
6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (Second Oak leaf Cluster) with “V” Device.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__TSK__ __JTM___ __FNE___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___MR. Fred N. Eichorn__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001064859 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020110 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | MR SCHNEIDER |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0020.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017751
His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) * Vietnam Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Good Conduct Medal * Purple Heart 9. GO awarded the applicant three awards of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008722
There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Although the applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show four awards of the Army Commendation Medals, evidence of record shows he received only three awards of the Army Commendation Medal, of which two were for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078598C070215
The applicant provided an award certificate, dated 30 July 1970, which shows he received the Air Medal (Third through Twenty-Second Award) for meritorious achievement for the period 10 August 1969 to 20 June 1970. Evidence of record also shows the applicant received a second award of the Air Medal for heroism on 10 March 1970 in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the two award certificates for the Air Medal (Second Award) for heroism provided by the applicant, he has presented no orders which show...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010027
The applicant requests, in effect, that all awards approved after his departure from Vietnam and all awards he did not receive while on active duty be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge. On the date he was released from active duty, he had completed 2 years, 10 months, and 2 days active military service, with no lost time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000825C070205
In the absence of a proper award authority for this decoration, the applicant may request a third award of the Bronze Star Medal under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code. Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 10444, dated 23 October 1970, show the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 1st...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010436C070208
The applicant's service personnel records show he served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam and is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of record also shows that the applicant participated in one campaign during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing one award of the Purple Heart, award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000735
The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm he completed the number of missions necessary to be awarded the Air Medal, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base a fourth award of the Air Medal in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010601C070208
The applicant requests that his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his correct Social Security Number and Service Number. A review of the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF), to include his DA Form 20, his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record), the recommendation for award, various orders, and many other documents contained in his file show that the third digit of his service number is an eight and the fourth...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078364C070215
He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 11 March 1971 to show award of the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Air Medal (Second Award) with "V" Device and the Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge that he earned during the Vietnam War. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Air Medal (Second Award) with "V" Device and the Bronze Star Medal that was issued to all combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000778
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 October 1968 to show 37 awards of the Air Medal (correctly known as the Air Medal with Numeral 37) and a second award of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 October 1968 shows the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Bronze Star Medal with...