Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020602
Original file (20090020602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  13 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020602 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged from the Army on 13 August 1949 in the rank of staff sergeant.

2.  The applicant states he was a staff sergeant at the time he was discharged from the Army and when he was in Korea.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a request pertaining to military records
* a picture
* a copy of Special Orders Number 29, dated 13 February 1951

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  On 14 August 1946, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed training as a military policeman.

4.  He was honorably discharged on 13 August 1949 at the expiration of his term of service.

5.  Item 3 (Grade) of his WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) shows he was discharged in the rank of sergeant.  Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) shows his highest grade as technician third grade, which prior to the 1 August 1948 conversion of pay grades for enlisted personnel was equal to the rank of staff sergeant.  After 1 August 1948, the rank of staff sergeant no longer existed until 1 June 1958.

6.  On 13 August 1949, the applicant was furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate showing his rank as sergeant.

7.  On 26 March 2003, the applicant was issued a Certificate of Military Service showing he was honorably discharged on 13 August 1949 in the rank of sergeant.

8.  A review of the enlisted rank/pay grade structure of the Army and the conversion of pay grades for enlisted personnel in effect at that time of the applicant's discharge consisted of grades 1 through 7:  recruit (grade 7), private (grade 6), private first class (grade 5), corporal (grade 4), sergeant (grade 3), sergeant first class (grade 2), and master sergeant and first sergeant (grade 1).

9.  Special Orders Number 29 submitted by the applicant show that after being ordered to active military service as a member of the U.S. Air Force effective 1 April 1951, he was involuntarily released from active military service on 31 December 1952 in the rank of staff sergeant.  He was transferred to the U.S. Air Force Reserve to complete his service obligation.

10.  War Department Technical Manual 12-235 (Enlisted Personnel Discharge and Release from Active Duty), then in effect, states a Report of Separation is completed using service records, Soldier's Qualification Card, Immunization Register, and information ascertained by interview with the dischargee.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the available records does not show the applicant was discharged from the Army in the rank of staff sergeant. 

2.  While he may have held the rank of staff sergeant at some point during his Army service, at the time of his discharge from the Army he held the rank of sergeant.  His WD AGO Form 53 and his Honorable Discharge Certificate show he was discharged from the Army on 13 August 1949 in the rank of sergeant.

3.  The applicant was discharged from the Army in the rank of sergeant and his records properly reflect this information.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x____  __x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020602



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020602



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000391

    Original file (20080000391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the military records of her husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was a staff sergeant and that he served in World War II. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The available records show the FSM was a sergeant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120004185

    Original file (20120004185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Technician Fourth Grade (T-4) instead of corporal (Cpl). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The Enlisted Grade Structure in the Army has changed several times since 1942.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014974

    Original file (20100014974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Sergeant First Class (SFC) instead of a Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt). The evidence of record shows the FSM served on active duty from 20 January 1944 through 5 June 1946. The rank "SFC" did not exist during his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052520C070420

    Original file (2001052520C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his rank on his 21 September 1951 DD Form 214 is incorrect; that he was activated as a sergeant; that he served as a sergeant; and that he was discharged as a sergeant on 24 March 1946. On 24 March 1946, the applicant was discharged from the AUS in the rank of sergeant. On 24 March 1949, the applicant was discharged from the ERC in the rank of Corporal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009465

    Original file (20070009465.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected in his personnel record. The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected on his personnel record. Evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003551

    Original file (20090003551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as that of S/Sgt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004263C070205

    Original file (20060004263C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 3 (Grade) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) with a separation date of 3 February 1948, shows he was discharged from active duty in the grade of "T 5" [Tech 5th Grade]. Evidence shows during the applicant's first enlistment, he was promoted twice and held the grade of Tech 5th Grade at the time of his discharge which is correctly shown on his WD AGO Form 53. Evidence also shows at the time the applicant's discharge, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001994

    Original file (20120001994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his rank as staff sergeant. The applicant provides: * FSM's DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1952 * FSM's Notice of Separation from U.S. The applicant's request for correction of the FSM's records to show his rank as staff sergeant and her contention that the FSM told her his rank was staff...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017664

    Original file (20130017664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Soldier's Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of Sgt upon enlistment in and discharge from the USAR. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in an active duty status from 23 September 1946 to 4 August 1948. However, a few days before his discharge, the Army changed the rank structure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016722

    Original file (20080016722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate that reflects his rank as a staff sergeant. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that his records are in error, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.