IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 May 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019760
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) be corrected from SP4/E-4 to SGT/E5.
2. The applicant states that he was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5 while he was in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on 11 April 1990.
3. The applicant provides a promotion order and his discharge certificate.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 June 1984, was awarded the military occupational specialty of man portable air defense system crewmember, and was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 1 April 1986.
3. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 27 April 1987. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he was separated in the rank of specialist, pay grade E-4.
4. On 11 April 1990, the applicant was promoted to the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5 in the USAR.
5. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214. It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is to record a Soldier's history during the period covered by the DD Form 214.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-5, he was promoted after his release from active duty.
2. Since there are no provisions to enter promotions which occur after issuance of a DD Form 214, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ __X____ __X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019760
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019760
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018300
The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. His Statement of Service (date of preparation illegible) shows his pay grade was E-4 on 1 February 1990. It states for items 4a and 4b, enter the active duty grade of rank and pay grade at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010745
Soldiers in the grades of E-5 through E-9 could request to appear before a reduction board. The applicant's record shows he served on active duty for 9 years, 6 months, and 25 days in the rank of SGT with a date of rank of 1 June 1972 when he was discharged from the Regular Army on 8 May 1978. Upon completion of this period of active duty, he was released to the USAR and the DD Form 214 issued on 17 July 1991 shows his rank as specialist/pay grade E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029882
His discharge orders show his pay grade as E-5. It further states that a grade determination is an administrative decision to determine appropriate retirement grade, retirement pay, or other separation pay and each case will be considered on its own merits. It states that each retired enlisted member of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his/her active service plus his/her service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368
As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012530
Chapter 2 states: * Items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank/grade held at the time of separation * Item 12h shows the effective date of pay grade * Item 12c (Net Active Service During This Period) shows the total active duty completed between the date entered on active duty and the date separated from active duty * Item 13 shows awards and decorations * Item 14 shows formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017300
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 May 1991 to show the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was properly released from active duty on 13 May 1991 in the rank and grade of SPC/E-4. On 13 May 1991, she was released from active duty and issued a DD Form 214 showing her rank and pay grade as SPC/E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004225
The applicant requests, in effect, that his 14 August 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his proper rank and pay grade and to add earned awards. Chapter 2 contains DD Form 214 preparation instructions and the instructions in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated that the PQR and all documents on file in the OMPF would be used as the source for DD Form 214 entries. Notwithstanding the pencil entry in item 18 of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011624
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he was promoted to captain (CPT)/ pay grade O-3. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009464
On 2 August 1993, the appropriate separation authority issued Orders 95-28, reducing the applicant from pay grade E-7 to pay grade E-1 and discharging him from the USAR with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), in effect at the time, specified in paragraph 2-11(2) that if a Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade would be that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010544
Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request for: * promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective 16 September 2011 with entitlement to back pay and allowances * placement on the Retired List in the rank of LTC vice major (MAJ) on his 60th birthday * correction of the applicant's mobilization DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 30 April 1991, to show his rank as LTC 2. Had he not requested...