Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016553
Original file (20070016553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070016553 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


x

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he would like his RE code dropped from a level “4” to a level “3” so that he can serve his country again.  The best job he ever had was being in the Army.  Since he has been separated from the service, he cannot manage on his own because he only knows how to be a Soldier.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 2003.  He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 14S (avenger crewmember).  He was promoted to specialist, E-4 on 1 July 2005. 

2.  On 19 September 2006, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 7 August 2006 to 27 August 2006.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to private, E-2 (suspended); a forfeiture of $713.00; restriction for 20 days; extra duty for 20 days; and an oral reprimand.  On 6 October 2006, the suspension of punishment of a reduction to private, E-2 was vacated due to breaking a restriction.  

3.  On 9 February 2007, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for wrongfully using cocaine between on or about 12 January 2007 and 15 January 2007.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to private, E-1; a forfeiture of $650.00 for 2 months; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days.  

4.  On an unknown date, the unit commander notified the applicant of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c for commission of a serious offense, drug abuse.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant acknowledged notification of the separation action.  He consulted with legal counsel and did not submit statements in his own behalf.  

5.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c for commission of a serious offense, drug abuse, with issuance of a general under honorable conditions discharge.  

6.  The applicant was discharged on 9 March 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2).  He completed 3 years, 3 months, and 5 days of active military service.  His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with a separation code of "JKK" (Misconduct-Drug Abuse) and was issued an RE code of RE-4.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribed procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows  that the SPD code “JKK” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for separation as involuntary release or transfer for “Misconduct-Drug Abuse” and that the authority for separation under this separation program designator is “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2)”.  Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated for this reason.  

9.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  

10.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was discharged on 9 March 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for commission of a serious offense, drug abuse.  

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated with a separation code of "JKK" and was assigned an RE code of RE-4 in accordance with the governing regulation in effect at the time.

3.  There is no evidence of record which shows the RE code issued to the applicant was in error or unjust.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

x_____x______ x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



x________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070016553
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Ms. Mitrano
ISSUES         1.
100.0300
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010243C080407

    Original file (20070010243C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 further confirms that at the time of his discharge, he held the rank of PV1 and he had completed a total of 11 months and 8 days of active military service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (drug abuse)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002108C071113

    Original file (20070002108C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The reason for the proposed action was the applicant’s wrongful use of Ecstasy, a Schedule 1 controlled substance and the applicant’s choice to drive while under the influence of this drug. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018880

    Original file (20080018880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 June 2008, the applicant's commanding officer informed him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14 (Separation for misconduct), paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a serious offense). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of "4" is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011602

    Original file (20060011602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that same day, the applicant's commander recommended that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct-commission of a serious offence, prior to his ETS date. The applicant's separation code of "JKK" is consistent with the basis for his separation and the RE Code applied to his DD Form 214 is consistent with the separation code; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a change of his separation code or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007125

    Original file (20080007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the record of his Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) hearing and associated documents in support of his application. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) based on his multiple incidents of illegal use of marijuana and cocaine. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019605

    Original file (20090019605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 23 May 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004222

    Original file (20070004222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her general discharge on 15 August 2006. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "JKK", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs" and the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)." The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001433

    Original file (20090001433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs – and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019660

    Original file (20090019660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code from RE-4 to a more favorable code that would allow him to reenter military service. The case analyst of record contacted the applicant on three separate occasions on 29 April and on 4 and 5 May 2010 to verify if he wanted an upgrade of his discharge through the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) prior to submitting his request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016652

    Original file (20130016652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 August 2007, the applicant was counseled on: * possessing marijuana and suspected cocaine * testing positive for marijuana * enrollment in the Army Substance Abuse Program * initiation of separation action for the commission of a serious offense under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) 7. On 10 September 2007, the applicant's immediate commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation...