IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 July 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019125
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be issued a 20-year letter and retired at the time he attained 60 years of age.
2. The applicant states that he should have been retired from the Reserve and granted retired pay when he turned 60 years of age. He goes on to state that he completed 20 years of a combination of active and National Guard time to qualify for retirement and be eligible to receive retired pay at age 60. He states that he has been trying to correct this error with his units of assignment to no avail and he desires the Board to correct his records to show he served 20 good years of service.
3. The applicant provides:
* Two letters explaining his application
* A copy of an electronic mail (email) regarding his points
* Copies of his separation documents
* A copy of a Certificate of Service
* A copy of his Army National Guard Current Annual Statement
* A partial copy of his DD Form 2656 (Application for Retired Pay) and
* Copies of his Retirement Credits Record
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants records are incomplete at best; however, the documents provided by the applicant show that he was born on 14 April 1936 and was inducted in Ashland, Kentucky on 25 March 1954 and served on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) 8 March 1956 and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR).
3. He enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) on 12 November 1956 and served until he was honorably discharged on 19 February 1957 due to a change of residence (State).
4. On 25 April 1960, he enlisted in the West Virginia Army National Guard (WVARNG) and served until he was honorably discharged on 18 October 1960 due to incompatible occupation.
5. He enlisted in the Regular Army in Beckley, West Virginia on 31 January 1961 and served on active duty until he was honorably discharged on 21 December 1962 due to hardship.
6. On 19 October 1964 he enlisted in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) and served until he was honorably discharged on 25 August 1967 due to a change of residence.
7. He again enlisted in the WVARNG on 9 September 1967 and served until he was honorably discharged on 23 April 1968 due to change of residence.
8. On 8 June 1968, he enlisted in the NCARNG and served until he was honorably discharged on 7 June 1969 due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS). He again enlisted in the NCARNG and served until he was honorably discharged on 10 October 1974 due to a change of residence.
9. On 2 November 1976, he enlisted in the USAR in Asheville, North Carolina and served until he was honorably discharged on 30 September 1977. He enlisted in the NCARNG on 1 October 1977 and served until he was honorably discharged on 30 September 1980 due to his ETS. At that time he was issued a Certificate of Service indicating that he had 22 years of service of which 13 years had been served in the National Guard.
10. The applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 on 11 April 1996 requesting that he begin receiving retired pay at age 60 effective 14 April 1996. The record is silent as to what response he received.
11. A review of the Army National Guard Current Annual Statement shows that as of 21 August 2009, the applicant had only 15 creditable years for retired pay purposes. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever issued a 20-year letter.
12. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from officials at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) which indicates, in effect, that after reviewing all of the applicants documents, it was determined that the applicant had only 17 years, 1 month, and 8 days of creditable service for retirement and therefore did not qualify for retirement at age 60. Officials at NGB indicate that Soldiers must earn a minimum of 50 points in a retirement year to have that year credited towards 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay. Officials at NGB recommended that his request be disapproved. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment on 28 April 2010 and to date, no response has been received by the staff of the Board.
13. Army Regulation 135-180, Qualifying Service for Retired Pay - Nonregular Service, provides, in pertinent part in the regulation in effect at the time, that a Reserve Component Soldier who completes 20 qualifying years of service is eligible to apply for retired pay at age 60, provided that the last 8 years were served in the Reserve Components. A qualifying year of service is one in which the Soldier earns at least 50 points during the established retirement year. Any points less than 50 do not qualify as a qualifying year for retirement purposes. A Soldier must have 20 years of service in which he earned 50 or more points each retirement year in order to be issued a 20-year letter.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant had only 17 years, 1 month, and 8 days of creditable service at the time he was discharged on
30 September 1980. Therefore, absent evidence to show that he earned at least 50 points per year for those years or any other years in which he was not credited with the appropriate number of points, there is no basis to grant him points that he did not earn or to issue him a 20-year letter.
3. Inasmuch as the applicant has provided no evidence to substantiate his entitlement to such additional retirement point credits, there appears to be no basis to grant him credits to which he is not entitled. To do so would afford him a benefit not afforded to others in similar circumstances.
4. It is a well-known fact among Reserve Component Soldiers that until an individual has received a 20-Year Letter, sufficient service for retirement has not been established. The fact that the applicant has waited 14 years to ascertain that he did have 20 creditable years of service for retired pay purposes but has not provided the evidence to substantiate his claim is not necessarily indicative of an error on the part of the Department.
5. Additionally, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record does not show that he was improperly advised at any point that he had attained 20 or more qualifying years of service for retired pay purposes.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X____ __X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019125
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019125
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015308
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve at age 60 in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. Commanders may consider any misconduct, to include a record of unexcused absences or unsatisfactory participation, as evidence of inefficiency. The evidence of records shows the applicant held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 from 1981 through 1989.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019008
On 12 August 1971, a letter was dispatched to the applicant from the Office of the Adjutant General, United States Army Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri notifying the applicant that he was being removed from active status in the USAR because he had failed to attain the minimum points necessary during a retirement year to be retained in an active status. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant had only 14 years, 7 months and 2 days of creditable service at the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008632
The applicant's adjusted Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement Application for Retirement Pay shows that he earned 2,593 cumulative retirement points and a total of 20 years, 11 months, and 20 days of creditable service for retired pay. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant earned 2,593 total points for retired pay and a total of 20 years, 11 months, and 20 days of creditable service for retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all the State Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002918
The applicant requests that: a. he be awarded credit for qualifying years of service for non-regular retirement as a reinstated officer from the date of his voided discharge to the date of his return to the active Reserve (5 May 2005); and b. his discharge orders, Orders Number D-08-852440, dated 13 August 1998, be revoked and removed from his official records. The applicant's official records do not contain a copy of his honorable discharge orders (D-08-852440) from the USAR, dated 13...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004037
His record contains an ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) generated from the HRC Integrated Web Services (IWS) database on 9 November 2011 that shows: a. between June 1984 and June 1986 (the years he was enrolled in the Transportation Course) he earned 61 inactive duty points, 37 extension course points, 45 membership points, and 6 AD points; b. the years between June 1984 and June 1986 were qualifying years; c. between June 1994 and June 1995 he earned 38...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059666C070421
Records available to the Board show the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 5 October 1950 and completed infantry training. The Retirement Credits Record submitted by the applicant shows he had two years of service in the Army National Guard in which he did not earn the required 50 retirement points. Records show the applicant served 20 years in the Army National Guard and was 20 retirement points short of accruing 20 qualifying years for non-regular retired pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003915
The evidence shows that when the applicant made application for retired pay benefits, he was advised he had only 19 years, 8 months, and 28 days of creditable service for retirement and he was not eligible to receive retired pay. Based on the evidence and equity consideration in this case, the applicant is entitled to: a. have his discharge from the Army National Guard and transfer to the Retired Reserve on 17 November 1992 revoked; b. have a correction made to his ARPC Form 249-2-E,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016166C070206
On 14 June 2005, the applicant was recommended for discharge from the ARNG for having received a 30 percent disability rating from the DVA. The law that authorizes a 15-year retirement for Reserve members specifically applies only to members with physical disabilities not incurred in line of duty. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding his 31 July 2005...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005563
His ARNG Retirement Points History Statement shows he completed 19 years, 11 months, and 5 days of qualifying service for non-regular retirement. The FSM served in the ARNG and USAR from February 1989 through January 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * redistributing 35 of the FSM's excess retirement points to RYE 16 February 1996 to provide him with a full qualifying year of service for RYE 16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016144
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-Regular retirement and that she be entitled to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. Instead of recommending that the 5 excess retirement points be redistributed to membership points in the retirement year beginning 6 November 2007 and ending 11 July 2008, the Chief, Personnel...