Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018837
Original file (20090018837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018837 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he went before a medical board after being injured in basic training and he was later released from the Army.  He claims to have been told he would receive an honorable discharge under medical conditions with no benefits; however, he received an uncharacterized discharge.  He would like his records corrected so he can be employed with a Government branch.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 26 July 1991.  He was assigned to Fort Benning, GA to attend basic training.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he never advanced beyond the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 while serving on active duty.  His record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement.

4.  On 5 August 1991, during his medical entrance examination, the applicant complained of pain in his left middle finger and indicated he received surgery on that finger a year prior to his entry on active duty.  He was subsequently diagnosed with left middle finger flexor adhesion requiring surgical intervention to correct and he was referred to an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD).

5.  On 15 August 1991, the applicant appeared before an EPSBD and he was found medically unfit for appointment or enlistment under existing medical fitness standards.  The opinion of the evaluating physician was the condition existed prior to service.  The EPSBD recommended the applicant be separated from the military.

6.  On 30 August 1991, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD proceeding and requested to be discharged without delay.  On 3 September 1991, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge request, and on 9 September 1991, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  

7.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge shows he was discharged under the provisions Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, and he received an "Uncharacterized" description of service.  This document also confirms that as of the date of his separation had completed 1 month and 14 days of active military service.

8.  There is no indication the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of or change of reason for his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-11 provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated.  A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six 


months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation
40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3.  The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry level status.

10.  Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active service after a service break of more than 92 days of active service.  It further states that the character of service for members separated under the provisions of chapter 11 will be uncharacterized.  For the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier's status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to change his "uncharacterized" characterization of service to an honorable discharge has been carefully considered.  However, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the separation action was initiated on the applicant while he was in entry level status, prior to his completing 180 days of continuous active military service.  As a result, his service was appropriately described as "uncharacterized."  An honorable discharge may be granted only in cases that are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  There are no such circumstances present in the applicant’s record.  As a result, a change to the characterization of his service to honorable is not warranted.

3.  The record shows his separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

4.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.  As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for an honorable discharge.


5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018837



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018837



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003230

    Original file (20150003230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his character of service as under honorable conditions in lieu of "uncharacterized." Although not available for review with this case, it appears he was subsequently evaluated at Ireland Army Community Hospital, Fort Knox, and a DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSBD) Proceedings) was initiated wherein a competent medical authority determined he was medically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012128

    Original file (20140012128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her uncharacterized entry-level separation to show she was medically discharged with an honorable characterization of service. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020330

    Original file (20090020330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 August 2007, the discharge authority approved the applicant's separation from the Army. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following: * in item 24 (Character of Service), uncharacterized * in item 25 (Separation Authority), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11 * in item 26 (Separation Code), JFW * in item 27 (Reentry Code), 3 * in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), failed medical/physical/ procurement standards 6. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017714

    Original file (20130017714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011268

    Original file (20140011268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued upon his discharge shows he was separated under the provisions Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards and he received an "uncharacterized" description of service. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004508

    Original file (20130004508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The EPSBD found that the applicant failed to meet medical procurement standards and accordingly recommended his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11, separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009926C070206

    Original file (20050009926C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain a copy of a SF Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 9 May 1991, that was prepared prior to his entrance on active duty (AD) in the Army National Guard (ARNG), which shows that he was medically qualified for enlistment with a 111111 physical profile. The evidence of record shows that the applicant sustained an injury to his left knee, at the age of 15, prior to his entry on AD, EPTS. His DD Form 3647 indicated that he was found unfit for enlistment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010455

    Original file (AR20070010455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remain both proper and equitable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018460

    Original file (AR20070018460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/12/04 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003056

    Original file (20080003056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests award of the Army Service Medal (correctly known as the Army Service Ribbon) and the "A.O.S.M." On 31 July 1991, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. Army Regulation 635-200 states that unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier will be awarded an uncharacterized description of service if in an entry-level...