Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020330
Original file (20090020330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  8 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020330 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, change of his character of service and reentry eligibility (RE) code.

2.  The applicant states "uncharacterized" is not a beneficial characterization of service for reenlistment and that he passed the entrance medical examination.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 March 2007.

2.  A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings) shows an EPSBD found the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and that the applicant's medical condition existed prior to service.  The EPSBD recommended the applicant be separated for failure to meet medical procurement standards in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), paragraph 2-27d.

3.  On 31 July 2007, the medical approving authority reviewed the findings of the EPSBD and noted that retention of the applicant was not practical.

4.  On 3 August 2007, the applicant concurred with the recommendation of the EPSBD and requested discharge from the Army without delay.  Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 shows the applicant understood that legal advice of an attorney employed by the Army was available to him and that he also could consult with a civilian counsel at his own expense.

5.  On 17 August 2007, the discharge authority approved the applicant's separation from the Army.  Accordingly, he was discharged on 27 August 2007 after completing 5 months and 9 days of creditable service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following:

* in item 24 (Character of Service), uncharacterized
* in item 25 (Separation Authority), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11
* in item 26 (Separation Code), JFW
* in item 27 (Reentry Code), 3
* in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), failed medical/physical/
procurement standards

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who are not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training will be separated.  A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time of enlistment, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized (entry-level status) if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty service prior to the initiation of separation action.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation.  SPD code JFW is the correct code for Soldiers separated under paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200.

8.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  This cross reference table shows the SPD codes and corresponding RE codes.  The SPD code JFW has a corresponding RE code 3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to change his character of service and RE code was carefully considered, but is not supported by the evidence.

2.  During the first 180 days of continuous active military service, a member's service is under review.  When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an other than honorable conditions discharge.  An honorable characterization may be given only if the service clearly warrants that characterization by unusual circumstances of personal conduct and performance of military duty and is approved by the Secretary of the Army.  The entry-level separation is given regardless of the reason for separation.  This uncharacterized discharge is neither positive nor negative; it is not derogatory.  It simply means the Soldier did not serve long enough to qualify for a specified characterization of service.

3.  The EPSBD proceedings show the applicant suffered from a disqualifying medical condition that existed prior to his service.  Because this condition was identified within his first 180 days of service, his discharge was appropriately characterized as an entry-level character of service (uncharacterized).

4.  The evidence of record shows the applicant concurred with the proceedings of the EPSBD.  The SPD code and corresponding RE code were assigned because he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 
635-200.  The appropriate SPD code associated with this discharge is JFW and the corresponding RE code is 3.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to change his RE code.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ____x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020330



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020330



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000639

    Original file (20150000639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017740

    Original file (20110017740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017740 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The EPSBD recommended that the applicant be separated from the military due to his diagnosed medical condition. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004537

    Original file (20090004537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 April 1998, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021548

    Original file (20130021548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time of enlistment, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003019

    Original file (20110003019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time, and the medical condition does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010136

    Original file (20100010136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2008, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the proceedings because his condition was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011855

    Original file (20140011855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from RE-3 to a more favorable code so that he may reenter the military. On 2 May 2013, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations-Active Duty Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001282

    Original file (20140001282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012488

    Original file (AR20090012488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the record shows that on 29 April 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a right shoulder instability, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The characterization of service for Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002399

    Original file (20140002399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a: * 4 February 2010 letter from a doctor in the Boston Medical Center stating the applicant did not have any kidney stones that day * 28 December 2011 Boston University Urology Department letter stating the applicant was seen on 4 February 2010 and had no kidney stones * page 10 of enlistment documents showing his enlistment included an enlistment bonus, SLRP, and the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) * 5 January 2012 Clinical Record showing a medical waiver had been...