Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018525
Original file (20090018525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018525 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he separated prior to his contract ending while his unit was still deployed to Afghanistan.  He states he is a combat veteran and he was awarded the CIB in Afghanistan.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 November 2003.  It also shows he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  

3.  The applicant's record shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:

* Afghanistan Campaign Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Global War on Terrorism Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Parachutist Badge

4.  The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving in Afghanistan.

5.  The applicant's record contains a DA Form 4856 (Development Counseling Form), dated 10 August 2005.  This form contains a record of counseling of the applicant by his squad leader.  The summary of counseling portion of the form shows the squad leader counseled the applicant on his unsatisfactory performance of combat duty.  It indicates, while the platoon was in contact with enemy personnel, the applicant refused a lawful order to get up and fight four times.  The squad leader stated the applicant showed an inability to control his actions under fire and put himself and his squad mates in great danger by not returning fire on the enemy.  It also indicated the applicant showed an inability to control himself and to do his job as an M-249 gunner on numerous earlier missions.  The "Plan of Action" portion of the form indicated the plan was to begin the applicant's separation processing under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical condition not a disability.  The "Session Closing" portion of the form indicated the applicant agreed with the information contained on the counseling form.

6.  After undergoing a mental status evaluation and his separation being recommended by his commander and approved by the separation authority, the applicant was honorably discharged on 8 September 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of "physical condition not a disability."

7.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge shows he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 5 days of active military service and he held the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 at the time of his discharge. 

8.  The applicant provides an undated SF 600 showing he was treated for nausea and vomiting by a medical specialist, resulting from a grenade explosion that took place within 5-10 meters of him during a firefight.

9.  Army regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. Section II, chapter 8 contains guidance on combat and special skill badges.  Paragraph 8-6 provides guidance on award of the CIB.  It states in order to support award of the CIB the member must meet the following three requirements:

	a.  Be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties;

	b.  Be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and

	c.  Actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention he should be awarded the CIB based on his combat service in Afghanistan was carefully considered.  However, the evidence is not sufficient to support this claim.

2.  By regulation, in order to be awarded the CIB an infantry Soldier must have satisfactorily performed infantry duties in a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, while the unit was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  

3.  Although the applicant served with a qualifying infantry unit in Afghanistan and was present with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, it appears his performance of duty during these engagements was not satisfactory, as evidenced by his being formally counseled and ultimately separated early based on refusing orders to participate in combat with his unit while it was actively engaged with enemy forces.

4.  Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant to confirm his satisfactory performance in combat, or confirming he was recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support award of the CIB in this case.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018525



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018525



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012418

    Original file (20130012418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. The DA Forms 2823 from his platoon leader and two other SPCs are consistent in their statements that the applicant was present on 2 July 2010 when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013045

    Original file (20080013045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, two notarized statements from two squad leaders, miscellaneous photographs of various Soldiers, copies of his unit’s morning reports, Internet printouts, and radio local news and newspaper articles, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004208

    Original file (20090004208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain orders that show he was awarded the CAB and/or the CIB. Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry specialty and satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the CAB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016253

    Original file (20140016253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * 5 DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement) * 2 Memoranda * DD Form 214 * Officer Record Brief * Narrative * Orders 095-005 * Orders 061-146 * Orders 070-002 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Chief, Plans and Operations Awards and Decorations Branch noted that Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 8-6 and Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 11-268 provides that in order to be eligible for award of the CIB: The Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000492

    Original file (20150000492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000492 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20140005241, on 12 November 2014. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000892

    Original file (20150000892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and he must actively participate in such ground combat. His military service record is void of documentation that shows he actively participated in ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010541

    Original file (20130010541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's (HRC) decision denying him award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a personal appearance before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The evidence shows his dismounted unit received six mortar rounds 75-100 meters from their position. By all accounts, there is insufficient evidence the applicant and his unit actually engaged the enemy in combat fire.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014114

    Original file (20080014114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004351C070205

    Original file (20060004351C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and he performed duties as an infantry when the unit was engaged in active ground combat. In this regard, the only evidence which would indicate the applicant did not perform his duties satisfactorily while engaged in active ground combat is the rating by his first platoon leader on his DA Form 20, and his commander’s recommendation to separate him for unfitness. The applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000438

    Original file (20120000438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The corresponding citation states the ARCOM was issued by PO Number 265-004 on 24 September 2007 and reads: For exceptionally meritorious service while serving as an Anti-tank driver against enemy forces in the town of Kajaki Sofia, Afghanistan, during recovery operations of a downed aircraft, [applicant] displayed the ability to make sound and timely decisions in a high pressure situation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) – as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190,...