Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016253
Original file (20140016253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140016253 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states sworn statements from the battalion S1 and battalion commander confirming his attachment to an infantry unit during a hostile operation in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) were not considered by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC).  

3.  The applicant provides:

* 5 DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement)
* 2 Memoranda
* DD Form 214
* Officer Record Brief
* Narrative
* Orders 095-005
* Orders 061-146
* Orders 070-002

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in the rank/grade of colonel (COL)/O-6 as an 18 series (Special Forces (SF)) officer in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) at the time of his application to the Board.

2.  Evidence shows on 19 April 2011, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of OEF.  He served in Afghanistan from 29 June 2011 to 12 April 2012.  

3.  On 25 May 2012, he was honorably released from active duty upon the completion of his required active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release does not show award of the CIB. 

4.  On 17 October 2012, his commander requested the applicant be awarded the CIB for personally engaging and being engaged by accurate enemy rocket propelled grenades (RPG) and machine gun fire while in ground combat on 14 September 2011, in Laghman Province, Afghanistan.  This form further states the applicant was attached to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment, Brigade Special Troops Battalion (Task Force Cheyenne), 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Task Force Thunderbird).

5.  Subsequently, the applicant's request for award of the CIB was positively endorsed by his chain of command to include The Adjutant General, Joint Force Headquarters, OKARNG.

6.  On 16 May 2014, the Chief, Plans and Operations Awards and Decorations Branch, HRC informed the applicant that his request for award of the CIB was disapproved.  The Chief, Plans and Operations Awards and Decorations Branch noted that Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 8-6 and Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 11-268 provides that in order to be eligible for award of the CIB:

The Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to Army Infantry or Special Forces Soldiers in the rank of colonel or below, who have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or special forces unit of a brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any such period the unit was engaged in active ground combat.  According to the documentation provided you were assigned to a Division level command.  Therefore, this request does not meet the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

7.  The applicant provides the following evidence in support of his application:

   a.  A DA Form 2823 authenticated on 18 September 2011, in which a senior noncommissioned officer attests to being two meters from the applicant when their position was attacked by an RPG on 14 September 2011 during Operation Brass Monkey.  He further states the applicant returned fire with his M4 carbine rifle and he continued to provide suppressive fire which enabled the mortar team to knock over and drag a 60mm mortar system to an alternate firing position.
   b.  A DA Form 2823 authenticated on 21 January 2012, in which a noncommissioned officer states on 14 September 2011, the applicant's position was attacked from the ridgeline by an RPG and the applicant immediately returned fire.
   
   c.  A DA Form 2823, dated 10 October 2012, in which the commander, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, states from 14 to 17 September 2011, Operation Brass Monkey was executed in Laghman Province, Afghanistan.  The applicant (who was the commander of the Stability and Transition Team) participated in the operation and was attached to the battalion in his capacity as a senior combat advisor and SF officer.
   
   d.  A DA Form 4187, dated 17 October 2012, in which his OKARNG unit commander requested the applicant be awarded the CIB for personally engaging and being engaged by accurate enemy RPGs and machine gun fire while in ground combat on 14 September 2011, in Laghman Province, Afghanistan.  This form further states the applicant was attached to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment, Brigade Special Troops Battalion (Task Force Cheyenne), 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Task Force Thunderbird).  
   
   e.  A DA Form 2823, dated 6 February 2014, in which the battalion S1 for Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 45th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, states from 14 to 17 September 2011, the applicant was involved as a Stability and Transition Team advisor during Operation Brass Monkey.  She further states that no attachment orders were issued due to the constraints of the deployment environment, the operation tempo, and the unpredictable mission window.
   
   f.  The Adjutant General for the OKARNG stated by separate memorandum on 19 August 2014, that the Board should favorably grant the applicant the CIB.  He states that HRC overlooked the sworn statements and noted the wrong named operation in their denial letter.  The Adjutant General states HRC should have accepted the sworn statements of the infantry battalion commander and the administrative officer (S-1) that swear the applicant was attached to the infantry battalion during the operation.  The applicant, a senior officer to the battalion commander, was attached with permission and authorization of the battalion commander.
   
8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, as amended by MILPER Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army Soldier must have an infantry or SF specialty/military occupational specialty and must have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or SF unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A Soldier must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or SF primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy, to close with and destroy the enemy with direct fires.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the CIB.

2.  The applicant's status as an SF officer in the rank of COL or below who was engaged in active ground combat during his service in Afghanistan on 14 September 2011 is not in question.  

3.  While it is understandable that the HRC denied the applicant's request for award of the CIB based on his assignment to a Division level command, the sworn statements provided by his battalion S1 and further supported by his chain of command confirms that attachment orders were not issued to the applicant for his participation in Operation Brass Monkey due to the constraints of the deployment environment, the operation tempo, and the unpredictable mission window.

4.  Based on the foregoing, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all 


Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

   a.  awarding him the CIB effective 14 September 2011; and

	b.  showing, in addition to the awards already shown on his DD Form 214 dated 25 May 2012, that his awards include the CIB.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016253



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016253



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011733

    Original file (20130011733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents which show: Document Date(s) Action Orders 032-733 1 February 2010 he deployed to Afghanistan on 1 April 2010 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom OER 14 November 2009 through 30 June 2010 he was rated as a brigade behavioral health officer while he was assigned to Company C, 10th Brigade Support Battalion, 10th Mountain Division DA Form 4187 12 September 2010 his company commander recommended him for award of the CMB for action on 4 October 2010 DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006346

    Original file (20130006346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * Self-authored statement * Email correspondence * Letter from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records * Two letters from the Awards and Decorations Branch * Two letters addressed to the Awards and Decorations Branch * Recommendations for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Extract from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 8-8 * DA Form 4187...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010541

    Original file (20130010541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's (HRC) decision denying him award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a personal appearance before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The evidence shows his dismounted unit received six mortar rounds 75-100 meters from their position. By all accounts, there is insufficient evidence the applicant and his unit actually engaged the enemy in combat fire.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016570

    Original file (20140016570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. It stated, in part, while engagement by direct fire weapons, including IEDs, does not qualify alone for award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029338

    Original file (20100029338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * Four non-sequential pages extracted from FM 3-21.10 * Six pages extracted from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) pertaining to the eligibility criteria for award of the CIB * Citation and certificate for the Bronze Star Medal * Email correspondence exchanged between himself and staff members of the National Guard Bureau * His CIB Recommendation Packet consisting of: * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) * Mobilization orders * Deployment orders * Battalion commander's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012418

    Original file (20130012418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. The DA Forms 2823 from his platoon leader and two other SPCs are consistent in their statements that the applicant was present on 2 July 2010 when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002644

    Original file (20120002644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a DA Form 2823, dated 2 October 2009, wherein a fellow Soldier stated that on 28 September 2009 he was on a mission with the applicant when they received SAF and RPG fire. The applicant's medical records and witness statement clearly show that he was injured as a result of a hostile enemy fire, wherein an RPG exploded near his position causing a contusive injury to his left ear. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012519

    Original file (20130012519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his statement of the incident of 29 September 2011 * his statement of the incident of 7 October 2011 * email endorsement from LTC K, dated 4 June 2012 * Commander's Recommended Approval, DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 20 June 2012 * Sworn statements from MAJ FDR, Chief Warrant Officer Two P, Sergeant (SGT) V, SGT F, SGT W, and SGT C * two Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) * Officer Record Brief (ORB) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. When the applicant provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020577

    Original file (20120020577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 January 2006 * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings, dated 29 March 2012 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) * CAB orders * Excerpts from Army Regulation 600-8-22 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009132

    Original file (20140009132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He should be awarded the Combat Medical Badge instead, and his records should be corrected to show this. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking that portion of Permanent Order Number Number 201-56, dated 22 July 2005, Headquarters, 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge * awarding the applicant the...