Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018403
Original file (20090018403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    10 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018403 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, he be issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to account for his 20 years or more of active military service and all of his awards.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was notified by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) of his eligibility for some awards and he would like those awards shown on a DD Form 214.  He retired in 2007.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his 1973 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), his NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) and separation orders, a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and resulting Army Achievement Medal certificate, an Award of the Global War on "Terror" Service Medal Memorandum For Record (MFR), his 20-Year Letter, his Retired Reserve orders, and a letter from the NPRC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His records show he enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) on 19 April 1971 for 2 years.  He was honorably released from active duty on 18 April 1973.  He was issued a DD Form 214 crediting him with 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of net service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendation, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) lists the following awards:  the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and the National Defense Service Medal.

3.  He enlisted in the Maine Army National Guard (MEARNG) on 3 November 1984.  He was honorably released from the MEARNG on 25 January 1998.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 26 January 1998.  

4.  He submitted a copy of a DA Form 638 and resulting certificate for his award of the Army Achievement Medal for the period 8 September through 15 December 2004.  He also submitted a copy of an MFR announcing his award of the Global War on "Terror" Service Medal for services rendered with the 98th Division Foreign Army Training Assistance Command at Camp Atterbury, Indiana, and Fort Bliss, Texas.  

5.  On 8 December 2005, he was issued a 20-Year Letter.  On 16 February 2007, he was issued orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve effective 31 December 2006, for completion of 20 years or more of qualifying service for retired pay.

6.  He further submitted a copy of a letter, dated 25 September 2009, wherein the NPRC advised him of authorized shipment of the following awards:  the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with bronze hourglass device, the Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon with numeral 2, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  

7.  His Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 7 June 2010, shows he completed 21 qualifying years for retirement as of 31 December 2006.



8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  A DD Form 214 would be prepared for selected categories of military personnel including USAR Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special word, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the USMC on 19 April 1971 and served on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty on 
18 April 1973.  He was issued a DD Form 214 that properly shows his credit of net service earned and awards earned during the period of service.  

2.  The evidence of records also show he enlisted in the MEARNG on 3 November 1983 and separated on 25 January 1998.  He was issued an NGB Form 22 that properly shows his credit of net service earned and awards earned during his period of service in ARNG.  He enlisted in the USAR on 26 January 1998 and served continuously in the USAR until his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 31 December 2006, at the completion of 21 years of qualifying service for retirement.  

3.  There is no evidence and he has provided none to show he again served on active duty after 18 April 1973 or as an ARNG and USAR Soldier wherein he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service to qualify for the issuance of a second DD Form 214.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018403





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018403



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003610C070208

    Original file (20040003610C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he had an additional 4 years, 1 month, and 1 day of qualifying service, giving him a total of 20 qualifying years of service for a Reserve retirement. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 17 February 1961; an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 25 April 1966; a Statement of Service dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013957

    Original file (20080013957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Army Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), and several other State ribbons/awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the applicant is entitled to the Army Service Ribbon. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003858

    Original file (20110003858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He goes on to state that he was promoted to the rank of MG and he was retired in the rank of MG on 30 November 1998. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), Section 1402, which governs the recomputation of military retired pay, DFAS was only authorized to recognize active duty retirees as having an entitlement to change in grade upon subsequent retirement. The law at the time the applicant was recalled to Reserve service did not include entitlement to recomputed retired pay for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017083

    Original file (20080017083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge. The applicant states, in effect, he believes the record to be in error because he received the Army Commendation Medal upon separation from active duty and the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal and National Defense Service Medal during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003837

    Original file (20130003837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged. The applicant states his record should be changed to reflect that he should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve and that he was not separated from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The orders advised him to contact a Retirement Services Office for a retirement briefing and issue of identification cards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021413

    Original file (20140021413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971 for 6 years. c. An ARPC Form 606-E, dated 21 March 1995, showing no retirement points for the years 1975 through 1977. d. A DA Form 3918-R, dated July 1996, in which a MOC was provided five pages of unidentified documents pertaining to the applicant from the ARPC. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971, for 6 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018738

    Original file (20090018738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum from the Chief of Staff, MEARNG, to the applicant's MOC, dated 25 February 1987, states: “Unfortunately, we will not be able to extend the enlistment of [applicant’s name] as he and his unit commander requested. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay - Non Regular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016548

    Original file (20070016548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not show that he requested a transfer to the Retired Reserve. to provide that Army Chief Warrant Officers shall be appointed by Commission. It would now be equitable and just to correct his military records by revoking his discharge order of 12 February 2002, and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date, with entitlement to retired pay upon his application at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006107

    Original file (20110006107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's NPRC file does not include any documents to show the applicant's USAR service. b. Paragraph 5-9 provides for award of the KSM and it states that the KSM is awarded for service in Korea between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954 and that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the ROK. However, in the event the applicant was seeking award of the ARCAM, the evidence of record does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013008

    Original file (20110013008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests three awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his service in the USAR and Army National Guard from August 1990 to August 1998. Since there is no evidence that shows he served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service during the period August 1990 to August 1998, there is no basis for granting the requested relief. The evidence shows he was awarded the first award of the ARCAM for the period ending 30 August 1994.