Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018292
Original file (20090018292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018292 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states he did not request a discharge in lieu of transfer to the Retired Reserve.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  

* Orders D-01-405199 dated 19 January 1994
* NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record 
   of Service) for the period ending 5 April 1990
* Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter)
* Orders 58-178 dated 26 March 1990
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or 
   Discharge) for the period ending 2 March 1973

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 4 March 1951.  He completed prior enlisted active and inactive service from 29 November 1968 through 23 June 1982.  He accepted appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 24 June 1982.  

2.  The applicant’s 20-year letter is dated 3 December 1989.  

3.  In a 6 February 1990, memorandum, the Indiana ARNG informed the applicant of the following:

   a.  He had been considered for retention in accordance with National Guard Regulation 635-102 and he was not selected for retention.

   b.  He was scheduled to be separated from the ARNG by 5 April 1990.

   c.  He became a member of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) upon discharge from the ARNG.
   
   d.  He must apply in writing within 30 days if he desired the orders to indicate 
his transfer to the Retired Reserve.

   e.  Orders would indicate transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) if he did not elect such assignment.

4.  On 5 April 1990, the applicant was discharged from the Indiana ARNG and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  Orders published on 19 January 1994 discharged the applicant from the USAR on 25 September 1993 under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175 (ARNG and Army Reserve Separation of Officers).

6.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) covers policy and procedures for assigning and transferring USAR Soldiers.  It states that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized in a number of circumstances, but an eligible Soldier must request transfer.

7.  National Guard Regulation 635-102 provided guidance and procedures for conducting the officer Selective Retention Board.  It prescribed policies and procedures for establishing and conducting selection boards used in the Army National Guard program for selective retention of officers and warrant officers beyond 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay.  The policy included providing for progression of qualified officers, by retaining the best officers for the comparatively few higher level positions, by providing a career incentive, and by providing the opportunity to serve beyond 20 qualifying years with advancement to higher ranks at the peak years of an officer's effectiveness. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he did not request a discharge in lieu of transfer to the Retired Reserve.    
2.  The applicant was considered by a Selective Selection Board and he was not selected for retention.  The evidence of record shows he had the option to apply for transfer to the Retired Reserve or he would be transferred to the USAR Control Group.  It appears he never elected that option.  As a result, he was discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the USAR Control Group.  

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 25 September 1993.  There is no evidence to show he ever requested transfer to the Retired Reserve once he was transferred to the USAR Control Group.

4.  Transfer to the Retired Reserve may be accomplished upon the application of an eligible member.  The evidence of record does not show the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis in which to transfer the applicant to the Retired Reserve.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  __X_____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018292



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018292



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018509

    Original file (20090018509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Department of Indiana, Indianapolis, Orders 047-022, dated 9 March 1994, honorably separated him from the INARNG effective 28 March 1994 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement). There is no evidence he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve prior to 28 March 1994. There is no evidence he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve at that time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011744

    Original file (20090011744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged from the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)). The evidence of record shows that having completed 20 qualifying years for non-regular retirement, the applicant was considered and selected by the CY01 and CY03 QRBs for retention beyond 20 years of qualifying service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068816C070402

    Original file (2002068816C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 018-010, dated 18 January 2001, issued by the Military Department of Indiana, directs that the applicant be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve member of the Army, effective 18 December 2000. Further, the Board finds an unintentional injustice was served upon the applicant as a result of her never being properly counseled on the service remaining requirement for her to be transferred to the USAR, and because she was never afforded the opportunity to take the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082870C070215

    Original file (2002082870C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve with proper benefits and reversal of his New Mexico Army National Guard (NMARNG) 1999 Selective Retention Board (SRB). The evidence also indicates that he was selectively retained for 1-year by the SRB convening authority for the purpose of completing his required civilian education, a bachelor's degree. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013069

    Original file (20100013069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge date be corrected to show 30 November 1990 and his twice nonselection for promotion to Major be expunged from his record. The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge date be corrected to show 30 November 1990 and his twice nonselection for promotion to Major be expunged from his record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army Records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing his November 1990...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008732C080213

    Original file (20070008732C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070008732 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, his option selection letter is not available to confirm he had actually requested transfer to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053043C070420

    Original file (2001053043C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 July 1996, 17 July 1997, and 27 May 1998, the applicant was notified by letter, signed by the IDARNG Adjutant General, that he had been considered by annual selective retention boards which recommended him among the best qualified for continued retention in the IDARNG. The National Guard Bureau Personnel Division rendered an opinion that the applicant’s record was properly reviewed by a State Adjutant General Selective Retention Board and he was not selected for retention. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003200C071029

    Original file (20070003200C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 31 August 1992 shows he was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) by reason of resignation from the ARNG. The applicant’s request to resign from the ARNG is not available; therefore it cannot be determined if there is a Government error or injustice in this case. However, the additional instructions in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003808C070205

    Original file (20060003808C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, that his service in the IRR (Individual Ready Reserve) be removed from his records in order to rejoin the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG). The regulation also specifies that officers who twice fail to be selected for promotion to the grade of chief warrant officer three will not be considered again for promotion, and will be transferred to the Retired Reserve, if they are eligible and request such transfer, or they will be discharged. The evidence shows...