Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018922
Original file (20090018922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  20 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018922 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that although his DD Form 214 does not show he was assigned to an infantry unit  he was on patrol daily, was combat proficiency trained, and it was his duty to protect his survey squad, and submits a VA Form 21-4138(Statement in Support of Claim) as his personal statement.

3.  The applicant submitted a VA Form 21-4138, Certificate of Achievements, 
two  pages of pictures, and a newspaper article in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 October 1968.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76A (Special Purchase Equipment Repair Specialist).  

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 23 April 1969 to 22 April 1970 and was assigned to the 34th Engineer Battalion performing duties as a Construction Survey Recorder and an Engineer Parts Specialist.

4.  Section 42 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB.

5.  The applicant submitted a copy of a Certificate of Achievement showing he successfully completed proficiency training from 11 to 16 May 1969, while in the RVN. 

6.  The applicant submitted pictures dated from 23 May to 6 June 1969.

7.  The applicant submitted an undated newspaper article stating that Captain J__n M_____l, who was assigned to the 1st Infantry Division, talked about surviving an ambush in the RVN. 

8.  On 1 October 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged.  He had completed 3 years of active military service.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was entitled to the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, RVN Campaign Medal, and Army Commendation Medal.  This DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the CIB.

9.  Item 5 (Original DD Form 214 is Correct as Indicted Below) of the applicant's DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show his record was corrected to add the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, RVN Campaign Medal w/ "60" Device, RVN Gallantry Cross w/ Palm Citation, Sharpshooter Badge with Auto Rifle Bar, and Marksman Badge with Rifle Bar.  This DD Form 215 does not show he was awarded the CIB.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

11.  All Soldiers are provided basic combat skills training after they enter the Army.  This is provided to ensure that all Soldiers have the survival skills to perform basic infantry missions when the need arises.  No other Soldier in combat is more exposed on a daily basis to the dangers and hardships of war and no other branch of the service suffers more casualties than the infantryman.  To maintain the prestige, uniqueness, and traditional value of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the criteria for award has changed little over the years. While the exigencies of combat may require non-infantry Soldiers to temporarily perform the basic infantry duties that all Soldiers are taught, it does not serve as a basis for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although the applicant submitted newspaper article about a captain in the 1st Infantry Division and pictures of the RVN, there is no evidence of record nor did he submit any evidence showing he held an infantry MOS, engaged in active ground combat, or was assigned to an infantry unit.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_ ____  ___ x____  __ x___  DENY APPLICATION












BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ______________x___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018922



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015292

    Original file (20090015292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080011103 on 4 September 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006360

    Original file (20090006360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also determined there were no orders awarding the applicant the CIB on file in his military record or entries on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that confirmed he was ever awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving in the RVN. Paragraph 3 of THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE of the 21 October 2008 Record of Proceedings (ROP) includes the newspaper article in question in the list of exhibits reviewed and considered by the Board during this original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008436

    Original file (20090008436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004100

    Original file (20130004100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * His DD Form 214 * Orders from the U.S. Army Reserve dated 21 March 1973 * Orders assigning him to the 121st Aviation Company, dated 4 June 1968 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * A 10-page self-authored letter * Information on Pathfinders * A picture of himself as a Pathfinder in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show he was awarded the CIB. He also provides...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016240

    Original file (20130016240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 November 1967 through 17 April 1970...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011500C070208

    Original file (20040011500C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 13 September 1966; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 12 September 1969. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004986

    Original file (20090004986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records do not contain any orders or other evidence showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge for satisfactory performance of duty as a combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008743

    Original file (20050008743.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the CIB and ARCOM he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) were erroneously omitted from the list of authorized awards contained in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 5 April 2003 separation document (DD Form 214). Absent any new evidence (third-party eye-witness statements, CIB awards orders, etc) confirming that the applicant was awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009508

    Original file (20100009508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM). There is no evidence he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or the AM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not submit any evidence that conclusively shows the helicopter was downed because of enemy action or that he was directly involved in the incident.