Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018035
Original file (20090018035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018035 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to terminate participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states he was misinformed on drawing concurrent benefits from Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and active duty retirement at the same time.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DFAS-CL Form 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement) and a self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 23 December 1966.  He completed prior service in the Army National Guard and the Regular Army.  He enlisted in the Arkansas Army National Guard on 30 July 1990.

2.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 12 October 2003 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he served in Iraq from "23 March 2003" to 6 November 2004, and he was released from active duty on 18 November 2004.

3.  On an unknown date, the applicant was evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD).  The MEBD proceedings are not available.  He was referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).
4.  In a 23 September 2008 memorandum, the Chief, Operations Division, U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, Washington, DC, informed the applicant of the following:

   a.  He had been found to have a disability and would be permanently retired with a 70 percent (%) disability rating percentage.

   b.  He must complete enclosure 2, DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) and send it to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).

	c.  If he required assistance, contact a Retirement Services Officer at any major military installation.

	d.  He was encouraged to contact the VA servicing his area to determine what benefits would be available to him.

	e.  He and his authorized family members were entitled to an Identification and Privilege Card.

5.  On 21 October 2008, an informal PEB determined the applicant was physically unfit for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with major depressive disorder, asthma, and residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI).  The PEB recommended permanent disability retirement with a combined disability rating of 70 percent.

6.  The applicant’s DD Form 2656 is not available.

7.  On 29 October 2008, the applicant was medically retired from the Army National Guard under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-35l(8) by reason of being medically unfit for retention.  On the following day, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  At the time of his discharge, he had completed 23 years, 2 months, and 29 days total service for retired pay.

8.  The applicant’s DFAS-CL Form 7220/148 with an effective date of 24 April 2009 shows SBP premiums ($171.32) for spouse and child(ren) coverage were deducted from his retired pay.  The statement indicated he had paid 6 months toward his 360 months of paid-up SBP coverage.  

9.  The applicant provided a self-authored statement that stated the following:

* He fell in the gray area when he was medically retired from the Army and he was misinformed on what he was eligible to receive
* He was a full-time Department of Defense (DOD) civilian technician working for the National Guard and he was called to active duty
* He was injured in Iraq during combat operations
* He was evaluated by the VA and given a 100% disability rating percentage
* He was told he could receive a VA disability rating with an active duty retirement
* He went through an MEBD/PEB and given a medical retirement with a 70% disability rating percentage with 75% being the highest the Army gives
* He would have never elected SBP if he had been informed correctly about drawing both VA benefits and active duty retirement
* His wife is protected through SBP covered from his DOD civilian technician job and the VA
* He now stays home due to his disabilities and his wife left her job to help him
* The SBP debt is now an unnecessary burden

10.  In a 13 July 2010 email, the Board analyst notified the applicant to provide an up-to-date concurrence from his spouse.  His spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 22 July 2010, indicating she concurred with the applicant's decision to terminate his participation in the SBP.

11.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The member may elect not to participate (with their spouse’s concurrence, if required), but the election must be made before the first day for which the member is eligible to receive retired pay.

12.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was medically retired on 29 October 2008.  His DD Form 2656 is not available; however, his DFAS-CL Form 7220/148 shows SBP premiums for spouse and child(ren) coverage are being deducted from his retired pay.

2.  The applicant's spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 22 July 2010, concurring with his decision to cancel enrollment in the SBP.  

3.  It appears it was the applicant's and his spouse’s intent to decline participation in the SBP.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the applicant’s DD Form 2656 to show he declined to participate in the SBP in a timely manner and to refund him any paid premiums.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 2656 of the individual concerned be amended to show he and his spouse signed the form in a timely manner declining to participate in the SBP and it was received and accepted for processing by the appropriate office, thus resulting in him never being enrolled in the SBP and being due a refund of all SBP premiums paid.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018035





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018035



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007817

    Original file (20140007817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advised that the SBP premiums would be deducted from his Military Disability Retired Pay every month. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show his participation in the SBP was terminated effective 23 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to by: a. showing his DD Form 2656-2 was received and processed on 23 September 2013; b. terminating his participation in the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018652

    Original file (20140018652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected SBP coverage for spouse based on the full gross pay. In connection with his disability retirement, at a combined rating of 50 percent, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected participation in the SBP program for spouse coverage based on the full amount. The applicant retired on 27 August 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001340

    Original file (20090001340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show his spouse concurred with his election made on 27 October 2008, not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), by showing that date in block 32b (Date Signed). As for the applicant's request for an expedited refund of the costs of the SBP already deducted from his retired pay account, the ABCMR only corrects military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013476

    Original file (20140013476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. A letter, dated 19 December 2013, wherein DFAS advised him of the following: (1) They received the copy of his divorce decree requesting that his current (second) spouse be removed from SBP coverage due to divorce. In view of the continued deduction of his SBP premiums since 1993, his desire to provide SBP for his former spouse, and the fact that there is no current spouse with a vested interest, it would be appropriate as a matter of equity to correct the applicant's records to show he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003413

    Original file (20130003413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to his retirement, the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 and elected spouse and children coverage based on the full amount of his retired pay. Although this is not necessarily the Army's fault and there is no error in his records, since he applied immediately and his spouse has concurred with the decision to terminate SBP enrollment, as a matter of equity only, his records should be corrected to show he made an election to decline participation at the time he retired and his spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006089

    Original file (20080006089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show she did not elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. He states that both he and the applicant made the decision not to elect coverage, but that he signed the DD Form 2656 one day prior to the applicant. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588

    Original file (20100007588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage. On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid; b. showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027069

    Original file (20100027069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a notarized statement from his spouse indicating that she previously declined SBP and she was still declining SBP * a copy of his DFAS-CL 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement), dated 11 August 2010 * a copy of a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay), dated 18 May 2005, showing that he declined SBP with spouse's concurrence CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A review of the DFAS-CL 7220/148 provided by the applicant shows he waived his Retired Pay because his DVA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067415C070402

    Original file (2002067415C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 7 November 1977. Premiums are normally deducted from retired pay. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 on 30 September 1996 and declined, with his spouse’s concurrence, to participate in the SBP, making the debt for SBP premiums invalid.