IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 August 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011785
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests change of his retired rank/grade to major (MAJ)/O-4.
2. The applicant states he believes his retired rank/grade should be MAJ/O-4. He claims he possesses lawful promotion orders now labeled as an administrative error. He claims the orders were never revoked or rescinded but have been removed from his record. He states he was transferred to the Retired Reserve which precluded his promotion. He states he does not believe he was adequately counseled about retirement and wrongfully denied the opportunity for promotion.
3. The applicant provides the 14 documents identified in the Table of Contents included with his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The record shows after serving in the Regular Army (RA) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in an enlisted status from 29 January 1974 through 28 January 1982, he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR on 29 January 1982.
2. On 31 January 1994, the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, MO [now known as Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis
(HRC-STL)] issued the applicant a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). It informed the applicant he had completed the required years of qualifying service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 upon application. The notification indicates he was assigned to a troop program unit (TPU) at that time.
3. The record shows the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 on
20 January 1984, and to captain (CPT)/O-3 on 1 April 1986.
4. On 26 May 1994, the U.S. Army Total Personnel Command, St. Louis, published a memorandum notifying the applicant he had been selected for promotion to MAJ/O-4 by a Reserve Component's Selection Board (RCSB) and that his promotion eligibility date was 31 March 1993.
5. The applicant's Statement of Retirement Points indicates he actively participated with his TPU through retirement year ending 28 January 1995.
6. On 30 June 1995, ARPERCEN Orders C-06-541559 directed the applicants transfer to the Retired Reserve, in the rank/grade of CPT/O-3, effective 30 June 1995. These orders indicate he was assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) at the time. These orders were amended by ARPERCEN Orders C-06-541559A01 which amended the retired rank/grade to MAJ/O4.
7. On 27 May 2008 and 21 April 2009, HRC-STL published orders recalling the applicant to active duty from retired status in the rank/grade of CPT/O-3, effective 1 June 2008 and 2009, respectively. The applicant remained serving on active duty in this status as of the date of his application to the Board.
8. In connection with the processing of this case, on 11 June 2010, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1. The advisory official recommended granting the applicant full relief. The official indicates the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ/O-4 and on 30 June 1995, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. It states there is no record of the applicant requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve at the time and on 31 July 1995, the order transferring him to the Retired Reserve was amended to reflect the rank/grade MAJ/O-4. On numerous occasions the applicant sought clarification as to his true rank and the issue remains unresolved. It further indicates HRC-STL promotion officials confirm under the policy in existence at the time, the applicant would have been automatically promoted to MAJ/O-4; however, due to the passage of time and destruction of records neither USARC or HRC-St. Louis can confirm the applicant was ineligible for promotion to MAJ/O-4 in 1994.
9. The advisory official further states the applicant has served on Retiree Recall missions since 2008; however, a retiree recall is not eligible for promotion. The fact the applicant was selected for promotion and there exists no evidence proving him ineligible for promotion at the time, USARC strongly supports the
conclusion that the failure to promote the applicant was in error through no fault of his own.
10. On 16 June 2010, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information and to allow his the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond.
11. The applicant provides an HRC-STL letter, dated 22 December 2009, which responded to his request for a clarification of his rank. It indicates that although he was selected for promotion to MAJ/O-4, he would have had to be in an authorized position for that rank in order to be promoted and his record showed he was not in a MAJs position at the time. It further indicates once he transferred to the Retired Reserve he was ineligible for promotion and as a result the amendment he received to his Retired Reserve orders showing his rank as MAJ/O-4 was an administrative error.
12. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and of commissioned and warrant officers (WO) of the USAR.
13. Chapter 4, Section III of the promotion regulation provides guidance on dates of promotion. It states a unit officer is promoted after selection if all qualifications are met. Paragraph 4-9 contains guidance on promoting officers selected for promotion. It states a USAR TPU officer who is considered and selected by a mandatory promotion board will be promoted and transferred from the unit to the IRR. The officer will be promoted within 60 days of receipt of promotion notification or the normal established promotion eligibility date. Officers transferred to the IRR to accept a promotion will be promoted upon attaining the maximum years in grade (MYIG). Table 2-1 contains the time in grade requirements for promotion. It shows the MYIG for promotion to MAJ/O-4 is 7 years.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that he should have received counseling regarding his promotion prior to being transferred to the Retired Reserve and promoted to MAJ/O-4 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.
2. By regulation, TPU officers selected for promotion should be transferred to the IRR in order to accept promotion if they are not filling an authorized position in the higher grade or unless they agree to a delay in promotion. In this case, the applicant was notified of his selection for promotion on 26 May 1994, and was
eligible to be promoted effective 31 March 1993 based on his MYIG. As a result, absent any evidence that he was offered the opportunity to transfer to the IRR to accept promotion or that he voluntarily agreed to delay his promotion, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he was transferred to the IRR on
29 January 1995 (the day after his Statement of Retirement Points indicates he stopped participating with his TPU), and that he was promoted to MAJ/O-4 effective that same date with a date of rank of 31 March 1993.
3. Further, his record should be corrected to show he was transferred into the Retired Reserve as a MAJ/O-4 on 30 June 1995, and that any service he has performed in a retiree recall status was performed as a major/0-4. It would also be appropriate to provide the applicant all active duty back pay and allowances due as a result of his serving as a MAJ/O-4 vice a CPT/O-3 while in a retiree recall status.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he was transferred to the IRR on 29 January 1995, promoted to MAJ/O-4 effective that same date with a date of rank of 31 May 1993;
b. showing he was transferred to the Retired Reserve, in the rank/grade MAJ/O-4 on 30 June 1995;
c. showing he performed his retired recall service as a MAJ/O-4; and
d. providing him all back pay and allowances due for his retiree recall service as a MAJ/O-4.
___________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011785
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100011785
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009475
In the USAR, the applicant was only promoted to 1LT/O-2. In 2002, the applicant states that ARPERCEN sent him a letter stating that he was eligible for promotion to CPT/O-3 with an effective date of 1993 within the USAR; however, CTARNG would not honor that promotion. These boards do not reconsider officers who were not considered or not selected by mandatory promotion boards that convened before 1 October 1996. b. Paragraph 3-19c states these boards are convened to correct/prevent an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331
The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010900
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010900 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 4-11a of Army Regulation 135-155 states that an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must meet the requirements listed below before being promoted in the Reserve components. Paragraph 4-21b(2) of Army Regulation 135-155 states that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have his/her promotion date and effective date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014720
He claims under the policy contained in Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR) Memorandum, dated 18 April 2008, which was in effect at the time, having made the LTC promotion list as a mobilized officer serving on active duty, he should have been promoted to LTC upon being matched against a position of like rank and grade. This official indicated the applicant was considered for promotion by the FY07 LTC RCSB that convened on 11 September 2007, and was promoted to LTC in orders, dated 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001688
In the processing of this case, on 17 March 2009, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), which explains that the applicant's DOR as a Reserve Component (RC) MAJ was 3 April 1998, which made him eligible for promotion to the rank of LTC on 2 April 2005, based on the 7-year time in grade requirement. The applicant's orders specified that his DOR would be adjusted to the date he entered active duty, which directly affected his promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016328C071029
In a 15 October 1984 letter from the State of California, Office of the Adjutant General to the Commander, 1/143d FA, the unit was informed that a Reserve CPT promotion board would convene on 8 January 1985 and that documents for officers listed on an attached enclosure had not been received. The applicant states that around November 1986 he resigned his Army commission from the USAR. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006828C080407
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Department of the Army (DA), Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, Subject: Promotion of Reserve Component (RC) Officers on a Promotion List Resulting from a Mandatory Promotion Board; Promotion Memorandum, dated 10 August 2000; IRR Transfer Orders, dated 27 June 2002; Promotion Orders, dated 31 May 2005; and ARNG Separation Orders, dated 20 February 2002. Headquarters,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015411
The applicant provides the following documentary evidence: * self-authored promotion date comparison sheet, dated 21 May 2010 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 9 June 1988 * DA Form 268 (Report for Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions), dated 17 February 1988 * memorandum, dated 5 February 1988, subject: Involuntary Separation Action * memorandum for record, dated 10 June 1988, concerning an appeal of his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) * Orders 6-3,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020328
On 1 July 2003, the ABCMR granted him relief and directed correction of his records to show he was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 31 March 1999 (2 years from his DOR as a 2LT). On 11 March 2009, by memorandum, an official at the Department of the Army (DA) Promotions, HRC-STL recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for promotion to CPT with a 2001 DOR and promotion to MAJ with a 2004 DOR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...