Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017631
Original file (20090017631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    29 June 2010  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017631 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was a specialist, E-4 at the time of separation.

2.  The applicant states he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, that reduced him to pay grade E-1, but the punishment was suspended.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records are not complete.  A number of entries on pertinent source documents are either missing or incomplete.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army as a private (PV1)/E-1 on 8 March 2001.

4.  An SGLV-8286 (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate), dated 5 April 2002, shows the applicant as a private first class/E-3.

5.  A DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist), dated 31 December 2003, shows the applicant as a PV1.

6.  Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Orders 364-0034, dated 30 December 2003, reassigning the applicant to the transition point effective 7 March 2004 show him as a PV1.

7.  The record does not contain any evidence of the NJP the applicant indicates he received.  However, a review of his pay records shows he was an E-4 from 1 October 2002 through 10 June 2003.  He was reduced to E-1 effective 11 June 2003 and remained in that pay grade through his date of discharge on 7 March 2004.

8.  His Enlisted Record Brief is dated 22 August 2001 and, as such, is of no clarifying value.

9.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) block 18 (Appointments and Reductions) shows only his initial entry rank and pay grade of PV1/E-1.

10.  His DD Form 214 shows he was released honorably from active duty as a PV1/E-1 with 3 years of creditable service with no lost time.

11.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he received NJP that reduced him to pay grade E-1, but the reduction portion of the punishment was suspended.

2.  The applicant's pay records show he was reduced to PV1 effective 11 June 2003 and received pay in that grade for 9 months prior to his separation.  
3.  The record does not contain a copy of the NJP and the applicant has not provided any evidence to show that his reduction in grade was suspended.  In the absence of a copy of the NJP showing his reduction to PV1 was suspended, the Board must presume regularity and accept that he was properly reduced.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017631



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017631



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003470

    Original file (20130003470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant received NJP on 23 February 1972 and his punishment was, in part, reduction in pay grade to E-2 suspended for 60 days. The evidence of record shows the applicant was then reduced (by court-martial) to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was advanced or promoted in rank/grade at any time after he was reduced to PV1 (E-1) on 20 May 1972.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014297

    Original file (20090014297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests in effect, restoration of his promotion to private first class (PFC)/E-3. He requests his rank be restored to PFC/E-3 based on the 2006 upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018285

    Original file (20080018285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reduction to the rank of private (PV1)/pay grade E-1, be set aside; that he be restored to the rank of specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4; and correction to Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant was discharged on 23 December 2003, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022965

    Original file (20120022965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 262-0196 (retirement) and Orders 271-0100 (amendment) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Dismissal of charges memorandum and acknowledgement memorandum * Multiple DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) of absent without leave (AWOL), present for duty (PDY), and deletion of erroneous entries * Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Disability Evaluation System Proposed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011621

    Original file (20120011621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show private first class (PFC)/E-3. There is no evidence of record which shows he was re-appointed to PFC/E-3 after his reduction on 24 February 2004. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015363

    Original file (20110015363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The record is void of documents or orders showing he was ever advanced above the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 subsequent to his 6 August 1976 reduction prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD). It stipulates the source records and documents for entries on the DD Form 214 are personnel qualification records and documents on file in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022022

    Original file (20110022022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 August 1979, the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 14-33b(1), for misconduct. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence of any medical condition that would have warranted consideration by a medical board under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085199C070212

    Original file (2003085199C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant is requesting correction of a reduction action which occurred on 14 March 1992. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...