Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017517
Original file (20090017517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017517 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was honorably discharged from active duty.

2.  The applicant states he was honorably discharged and he received an honorable discharge certificate, but his DD Form 214 was not properly completed.  Specifically, item 13a (Character of Service) was left blank.  He states his record should be corrected so he can seek employment.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 6 June 1969.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant received his appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the United States on 29 January 1965.

3.  After a 2-year delay, the applicant reported to active duty on 7 June 1967 for a 2-year commitment period as shown in item 6 (Date of Current Tour) of the applicant's DD Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record).

4.  On 15 October 1968, the applicant declined promotion to captain.

5.  On 6 June 1969, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  The reason and authority for his separation as shown on his DD Form 214 was due to his expiration of his term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 
135-173 (Reserve Components Relief of Officers and Warrant Officers from Active Duty).  A review of his DD Form 214 shows no entries in items 13a or in 17c (Date of Entry).

6.  There are no records of court-martial, punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or any other derogatory information that would warrant separating the applicant with less than an honorable discharge.

7.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR Control Group (Standby) on 31 March 1971.  The reason for his discharge was officer resignation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation states that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  All available records are used as a basis for preparing the DD Form 214, including the DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket), separation orders, DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record), DD Forms 214 for prior service personnel, and any other available records.  For officer personnel in item 17c enter the date of entry on current tour of active duty as shown in item 6, DA Form 66.  Normally only the word "honorable" may be used if an officer is released from active duty and reverts to USAR control.  



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 was not properly completed when he was released from active duty on 6 June 1969.  His DD Form 214 does not show his characterization of service upon his release from active duty.

2.  Based on the available evidence, regulatory guidance, and a lack of derogatory information that would warrant a lesser characterization of service, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his records to show he was honorably released from active duty.

3.  While the applicant did not request it, a second correction to his published 
DD Form 214 would be appropriate for it lacks the date he entered active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show in item 17c 7 June 1967 as the date he entered onto active duty.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all 
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by  correcting his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 6 June 1969 to show in: 

* item 13a his character of service as honorable
* item 17c his date of entry onto active duty as 7 June 1967



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017517



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017517



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018851

    Original file (20080018851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 17c, shows that he was ordered to active duty from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 6 March 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his date of entry in item 17c on his DD Form 214 as 6 March 1965.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011612

    Original file (20110011612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 11 September 1969 to show his date of entry on active duty as 18 April 1967. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. His time spent in the USAR DEP is not active duty time; therefore, the entry of 22 May 1967 is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021977

    Original file (20090021977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1967, which is properly reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 November 1967. Since the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 1 January 1973, almost 1 year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending item 11d of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013095

    Original file (20080013095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 January 1967 for 3 years. Evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 January 1967 and served until he was released from active duty on 20 December 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017276

    Original file (20100017276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a DD Form 214 at the time of his discharge which shows "31 May 1967" in Item 11d and "18 July 1966" in Item 16c. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 July 1966 and was discharged to accept a commission on 31 May 1967. Item 17c of this DD Form 214 also properly shows 1 June 1967 as the date entered on active duty for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067161C070402

    Original file (2002067161C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the subject DD Form 214 shows that he was separated on 14 May 1969, but entered service on 8 August 1969. The applicant’s military records show that prior to the period of service under review, he served honorably in the Regular Army from 29 June 1966-7 August 1967. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in Item 17c of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023670

    Original file (20100023670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023670 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the RA on 17 November 1966 and he was released from active duty on 14 November 1969 after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of total active service. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence in which to correct item 11d of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014338

    Original file (20140014338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 September 1972 to show: * his date of birth (DOB) as 8 September 1947 * award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Air Medal * his date of entry as 12 or 13 December 1966 2. The applicant states: * his DOB should be 8 September 1947 instead of 8 September 1945 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 September 1972 does not show the BSM or Air...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008219

    Original file (20150008219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SSN the applicant states is correct (xxx-xx-9176) was recorded in his records during his service. Therefore, item 17c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of entry year as "66" vice "666." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: * delete from item 3 the existing entry and add a similar entry but with the number "9" in the sixth digit * delete from item...