Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016646
Original file (20090016646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 25 February 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016646 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B and that he was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division and served in the Republic of Vietnam.  He also states, in effect, that he filed a claim for post-traumatic stress disorder and his claim was denied because there was no identifiable stressor in his record.

3.  The applicant did not provide any supporting evidence with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 May 1969.  He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded MOS 11B.  The highest rank he attained was sergeant/pay grade E-5.

3.  Records show the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 3 July 1970 to 15 August 1970.  While in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry, as a rifleman and squad leader in duty MOS 11B.  On 15 August 1970, records show he was medically evacuated from the Republic of Vietnam to the 248th General Hospital in Japan and then on to the military hospital at Fort Riley, KS.  The reasons for his medical evacuation to include his military medical records are not available for the Board's review.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 14 May 1971 upon the expiration of his term of service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his military service obligation.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant shows he completed a total of 2 years of active federal service with1 month and 13 days of foreign service.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following awards:  the National Defense Service Medal, the Parachutist Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB.

7.  A review of the applicant's official military personnel file did not reveal a copy of official orders awarding the applicant the CIB.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and procedures concerning awards.  Paragraph 8-6 provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge:  the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry specialty and have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant is an infantryman holding MOS 11B and his records show he was assigned to an infantry unit smaller than a regiment, there is no evidence to show that the applicant was personally present and under hostile fire or engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces when he served in the Republic of Vietnam.  As such, he did not meet the necessary criteria for award of the CIB.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence, specifically, documented evidence that shows he was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces or that he was under hostile fire.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief for he did not meet the necessary requirements for award of the CIB.  Therefore, he is not entitled to have his records corrected to show award of the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016646



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016646



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011168

    Original file (20080011168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011168 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In his undated statement, a member of the applicant’s unit states that he served with the applicant in the Republic of Vietnam in 1970 and that they were assigned to the 199th Infantry Brigade. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011626

    Original file (20080011626.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    With respect to award of the Purple Heart, there are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. With respect to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the applicant's infantry MOS and/or his service in the Republic of Vietnam are not in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000195C080407

    Original file (20080000195C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states, in effect, that new evidence is being provided to confirm the applicant's participation in ground combat as an infantryman. By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB there must be evidence that the member held and served in an infantry MOS, that he served in a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size and that he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry primary duty, in a qualifying infantry unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011103

    Original file (20080011103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's infantry MOS and/or his service in the Republic of Vietnam are not in question. In the absence of evidence that the applicant actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. _________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010129

    Original file (20080010129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the CIB and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001565

    Original file (20120001565.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB for the period 9 March 1970 through 1 February 1971; and b. adding the CIB to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 March 1975. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120001565 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018280

    Original file (20110018280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11B with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009125

    Original file (20070009125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 December 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009125 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There are no general orders and there is no evidence in the applicant's service records that show he was awarded the CIB. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007265

    Original file (20080007265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1967 to 17 July 1968 and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size (Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry); however, he held a vehicle mechanic MOS. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed another period of service in the Republic of Vietnam as an infantryman from 4 June 1970 to 18 September 1970 (when he departed on leave), and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009623

    Original file (20130009623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 21 February 1970 to 28 February 1971 in Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 42, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 17 September 1965 to June 1972 in DAGO 54, dated 1975 11. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...