Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016384
Original file (20090016384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  25 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016384 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he served in Saudi Arabia from 9 March 2001 to 8 March 2002 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and he should be entitled to the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal and other awards and decorations.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 
8 March 2004; a copy of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 
2 September 2009; and a copy of a certificate, dated 8 March 2002, showing award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 5 years on 8 August 2000.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31B (Military Police).  He was honorably discharged in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 on 8 March 2004 by reason of disability with entitlement to severance pay.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 3 years, 7 months, and 1 day of creditable active service.

3.  The applicant’s records also show he served in Saudi Arabia from 8 September 2001 to 2 March 2002 in support of Operations Desert Shift and Enduring Freedom.  He was assigned to the 59th Military Police Company.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service Ribbon.

5.  On 4 October 2009, the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 that added awards of the Army Achievement Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

6.  The applicant's record does not contain permanent orders awarding him his first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  His record is void of any derogatory information in the form of a court-martial, suspension of favorable personnel actions, lost time, or non-judicial punishment.  His records also do not contain a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal.

7.  The applicant submitted a copy of a certificate, dated 8 March 2002, signed by the Commander, Headquarters, Army Central Command, Saudi Arabia, which shows the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in Southwest Asia.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there 
is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in or be engaged in the direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  Qualifying service for Southwest Asia operations includes participation in Operation Southern Watch (1 December 1995 to 18 March 2003), Maritime Intercept Operation (1 December 1995 to 18 March 2003), Vigilant Sentinel (1 December 1995 to 15 February 1997), Operation Northern Watch (1 January 1997 to 18 March 2003), Operation Desert Thunder (11 November 1998 to 22 December 1998), Operation Desert Fox (16 December 1998 to 22 December 1998), and Operation Desert Spring (31 December 1998 to 18 March 2003).

10.  According to the trusted globalsecurity.org website, Operation Desert Shift was a U.S. Central Command-directed/implemented force protection initiative in Saudi Arabia to move certain military personnel from Eskan Village to Prince Sultan Air Base.  An initial objective of Operation Desert Shift was to consolidate Operation Southern Watch coalition forces at Prince Sultan Air Base.  By relocating, Headquarters Joint Task Force Southwest Asia established a Combined Air Operations Center and improved theater coalition partner operations.  These changes created the most advanced operations center and changed the next generation of warfare.  The 59th Military Police Company deployed from Fort Carson, CO, to Saudi Arabia, in early September 2001 as part of Operation Desert Shift.  The unit was scheduled to deploy with nearly 200 Soldiers for approximately three months.  While in Southwest Asia the unit was responsible for providing force protection to U.S. Forces in the region.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  With respect to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant served in Saudi Arabia from 8 September 2001 to 2 March 2002 in support of Operation Desert Shift, part of Operation Southern Watch, which is a qualifying period for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  Additionally, he received a certificate that shows he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for this operation; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

3.  With respect to the Army Good Conduct Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant served honorably during the period 8 August 2000 through 8 March 2004.  He served in Saudi Arabia, attained the rank/grade of SPC/E-4, and he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.  Furthermore, his record is void of any lost time, nonjudicial punishment, suspension of favorable personnel actions, or a commander's disqualification.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correct his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  _____X__  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 8 August 2000 through
7 August 2003; and adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal to item 24 of his DD Form 214.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016384



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016384



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023636

    Original file (20100023636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal * correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in Saudi Arabia in support of Operation Desert Spring, including the country, city, dates, or the operations 2. With respect to his dates of deployment, his TCS orders show he deployed on or about 10 September 2000. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03904

    Original file (BC 2013 03904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) certificate dated 15 Jun 1998, for Operation SOUTHERN WATCH. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02128

    Original file (BC-2011-02128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The DPSIDRA complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103414

    Original file (0103414.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that contrary to AFPC/DPPPR, the AFPC website does list Operation DESERT FOX (16 - 22 December 1998). Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510507C070209

    Original file (9510507C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to reflect service in Southwest Asia and associated service medals. The evidence of record confirms the applicant serviced in Southwest Asia from September 1990 through April 1991 and as such is entitled to the Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the Kuwait Liberation Medals awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Government of Kuwait. That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002986

    Original file (20140002986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in the Persian Gulf and the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), and any other awards he may be authorized. Enter all awards, decorations, medals, badges, citations and campaign ribbons awarded or authorized for all periods of service in item 13 on the DD Form 214. b. The available evidence shows he was in Saudi Arabia...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577

    Original file (BC-2003-02577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023836

    Original file (20110023836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The designated campaigns for Southwest Asia are: * Defense of Saudi Arabia (2 August 1990 to 16 January 1991) * Liberation and Defense of Kuwait (17 January to 11 April 1991) * Cease-Fire Campaign (12 April 1991 to 30 November 1995) b. In March 1994, JTF-SWA continued the drawdown of forces in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH by redeploying 3 F-16, 3 F-15E, and 3 F-15C aircraft from Dhahran, Saudi Arabia to the United States. d. Southern Watch operations continued without incident until...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02354

    Original file (BC 2013 02354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is entitled to the contested award due to deployments to Saudi Arabia in support of Desert Wind, Desert Fox and a deployment to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Therefore, the applicant meets the criteria for the AFEM for his direct support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH, for both deployments. Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01804

    Original file (BC-2013-01804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the AFEM w/1OLC. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 27 Jan 2014, under...