Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016085
Original file (20090016085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016085 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his "Uncharacterized" discharge and a change of his Separation Program Designator (SPD) and reentry (RE) codes on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was informed the uncharacterized description of his service, the SPD code of LGA, and the RE code of 3 cannot be waived to allow him to reenter the military.  He states his current degree will make him a valued Soldier in the information technology area.  

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 
30 August 1989, and successfully completed basic training.  However, while in advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Gordon, Georgia, the applicant was counseled for failing to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) on 
26 January; 2 February; and 9 February 1990.  

3.  On 16 February 1990, the applicant was notified of a pending action to separate him from active duty and transfer him to the Individual Ready Reserve under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), the Trainee Discharge Program.  The unit commander cited as the basis for the proposed separation action the applicant's APFT failures.  The applicant was also informed that he would receive an entry level separation with an uncharacterized description of service.

4.  The applicant acknowledged notification of the proposed separation action and indicated he did not desire to consult with counsel, he did not desire to make a statement in his own behalf, and he did not desire to have a separation medical examination.

5.  On 23 February 1990, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation with a characterization of service of "Uncharacterized" and an entry level status separation.  Accordingly, on 28 February 1990, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group, St. Louis, MO.  He had completed 6 months and 1 day of active service.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was assigned an SPD code of "LGA" and an RE code of 3.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation, or self discipline for military service, or they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The separation 
policy applied to Soldiers who could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.  The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation under this chapter.

8.  The same regulation further stipulates, in pertinent part, that separation under chapter 11 applied to Soldiers who were in an entry level status.  Soldiers are considered in an entry level status if they completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty service when separation action is initiated.  

9.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the Reserve.  This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  This regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

   a.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service at the time of discharge, but the disqualification is waivable.

	b.  RE-1 applies to persons completing their term of service (ETS) who are considered qualified to reenter the Army, so long as all other qualifications are met.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the SPD code of LGA as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is entry level performance and conduct and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11.

11.  The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD code is LGA then an RE code of 3 will be assigned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the characterization of his service, SPD code, and RE code on his DD Form 214 should be changed so he may reenter the military.





2.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct.  Based on the authority and reason for separation, his service was properly described as "Uncharacterized" and he was properly assigned an SPD code of LGA and an RE code of 3 in accordance with the applicable regulations.  

3.  The applicant has failed to provide evidence that an error exists on his 
DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.  

4.  The applicant is advised that if he wishes to reenter the military, an RE code of 3 is waivable.  Therefore, he should seek the guidance of a recruiter, who can best advise him on the needs of the Army and process a waiver if he meets all other criteria.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016085



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016085



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014870

    Original file (20080014870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, provides the SPD codes for Army personnel being separated from active duty. Table C-1 shows the SPD code of "LGA" was to be assigned to personnel being separated for Entry Level Performance and Conduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, shows the SPD code "LGA" was properly assigned to the applicant since he was separated for Entry Level Performance and Conduct under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028643

    Original file (20100028643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the appropriate narrative reason, reentry (RE) code, and separation code based on separation due to hardship. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant requests correction of his separation code, RE code, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019187

    Original file (20140019187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 April 2010, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, due to entry level performance and conduct. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty; individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD code of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017574

    Original file (20110017574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her separation program designator (SPD) code of "JGA" and her reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 be changed to more favorable codes so that she may reenter the military. It states that the SPD code "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. The applicant did not provide any evidence to support her contention that her drill sergeant told her that she could be discharged if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011209

    Original file (20140011209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities and the reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used. The regulation shows that the SPD code of "JGA," as shown on his DD Form 214, is appropriate for involuntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007075

    Original file (20100007075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was assigned the RE code of "3" because he was flagged for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). The records of Soldiers who fail a record APFT for the first time and those who fail to take the APFT within the required time period must be flagged in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-2 (Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions). However, he has provided no evidence to show he was not flagged at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006179

    Original file (AR20090006179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001051

    Original file (20140001051 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the notification for discharge, she was told that if approved she would receive an entry level separation with uncharacterized service. The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation under this chapter. The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation under this chapter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001051

    Original file (20140001051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the notification for discharge, she was told that if approved she would receive an entry level separation with uncharacterized service. The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation under this chapter. The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation under this chapter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012482

    Original file (20060012482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant, who was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), requests that his reentry (RE) code of “3” shown in Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be dropped or eliminated from his military records. Army Regulation 635-5-1...