Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012482
Original file (20060012482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  29 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060012482 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, who was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), requests that his reentry (RE) code of “3” shown in Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be dropped or eliminated from his military records. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that when he signed up for the Delayed Entry Program, he weighed about 300 pounds, but by the time he left for basic training he had gotten down to about 180 pounds.  He also states that he lost so much muscle tissue along with fat, that he was too weak.  He further states that he passed everything in basic training, even the road march, but that he failed the pushup event by one pushup.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 3 March 1989, the date of his relief from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 24 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 November 1988.  

4.  On 3 March 1989, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11, for failing to meet the physical fitness standards to graduate from basic training.  Evidence of record shows that he was provided five opportunities to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test, and failed all five times, even after being transferred to the Fitness Training Unit.  Although the applicant stated that he was discharged honorably, his characterization of service was “Uncharacterized.”  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 has an entry of “Entry Level Status.”  His DD Form 214 also shows that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “LGA,” and an RE code of “3.”

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided, for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The separation policy applies to Soldiers who cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline.  The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.

6.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the United States Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  RE codes 1 and 2 permit immediate reenlistment if all other criteria are met.  An RE code of 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  An RE code of 4 indicates separation from the last period of service with a disqualification which cannot be waived and ineligibility for reenlistment.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), AR 635-5-1 (Separation Documents) establishes RE Codes to be assigned for each SPD code.  

8.  An SPD code of "LGA" applies to persons who are relieved from active duty for entry level performance and conduct.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for entry level performance and conduct.  



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his RE code of “3” shown in Item 27 of his 
DD Form 214 should be dropped or eliminated from his military records. 

2.  While the Board understands why the applicant would want to have an 
RE code of “3” removed from his DD Form 214, his RE code is based on his reason for discharge and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for discharge is changed.  His narrative reason for discharge was based on his failure to meet fitness standards to graduate from basic training, and the Board could find no basis upon which to change this reason.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 3 March 1989; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
2 March 1992.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LE  ___  __LB  ___  ___MF __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




______ Lester Echols_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060012482
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070329
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.
100.0300.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016085

    Original file (20090016085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was informed the uncharacterized description of his service, the SPD code of LGA, and the RE code of 3 cannot be waived to allow him to reenter the military. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD code of LGA as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014870

    Original file (20080014870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, provides the SPD codes for Army personnel being separated from active duty. Table C-1 shows the SPD code of "LGA" was to be assigned to personnel being separated for Entry Level Performance and Conduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, shows the SPD code "LGA" was properly assigned to the applicant since he was separated for Entry Level Performance and Conduct under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028643

    Original file (20100028643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the appropriate narrative reason, reentry (RE) code, and separation code based on separation due to hardship. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant requests correction of his separation code, RE code, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067523C070402

    Original file (2002067523C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. On 4 March 1996, the ADRB denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was physically unable to perform his duties.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022277

    Original file (20130022277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 1989, the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for failure to meet exit standards for basic training. e. Paragraph 5-11 states Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006437C070205

    Original file (20060006437C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant request, in effect, that his reentry (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to a more favorable code and that item 12a (Date entered AD [Active Duty] This Period), of his DD Form 214 [Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty], dated 20 March 1990, be corrected to show the entry "73 09 28" (28 September 1973 [sic 73 09 29/29 September 1973]) instead of the entry "75 09 05" (5 September 1975). Item 18a (Record of Service/Net Active Service This Period), of his DD Form 214,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004129

    Original file (20110004129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. On 7 March 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge. His separation code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014007

    Original file (20140014007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's commander recommended that he be discharged from the Army under the provisions chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200. The commander stated the applicant had completed 1 week of basic training and had one Article 15. Although an Article 15 is mentioned by the applicant and his commander in his recommendation, there is no record of it in his Military Personnel Records Jacket.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022241

    Original file (20100022241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was enrolled in the Army Weight Control Program (AWCP) and met his weight standard on 4 August 2005 in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-9 (AWCP). The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 5500-R (Body Fat Content Worksheet - Male), DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003582

    Original file (20090003582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Reentry (RE) Code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from an RE Code of RE-3 to an RE Code that will allow him to take an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) assignment. The applicant states since his Regular Army (RA) separation, he has been a member of the US Army Reserve (USAR). XXX _______ _ _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...