Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016074
Original file (20090016074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  24 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016074 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of a document titled, "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction" from the performance section of his interactive Personnel Electronics Records Management System (iPERMS) record.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that in 2002 he was administratively reduced from sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 based on his cancellation from the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) due to failure to meet the weight control and Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) standards.  There is a document in the performance section of his iPERMS record titled, "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction."  He argues that the same document is located in the restricted portion of his iPERMS record, but titled, "Document Approving Recommendation for Removal from a Promotion List."  He continues that he completed ANCOC on 21 July 2006 and he was promoted back to SFC effective 1 September 2006.  He concludes that he worked hard to get back to where he is and this document will bring discrimination against him and possibly cause board members to look at his record as substandard in the upcoming master sergeant's selection board.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, Alexandria, VA, memorandum, Subject:  Administrative Removal from the Promotion Selection List, dated 15 October 2002, in support of his application.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank of SFC.

2.  U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command, Alexandria, Order Number 347-41, dated 13 December 2001, promoted the applicant to SFC effective 1 January 2002.  The special instructions on this order state that "SSG promoted to SFC who do not have ANCOC credit are promoted conditionally.  Those Soldiers who receive a conditional promotion will have their orders revoked and their names removed from the centralized list if they fail to meet the NCOES [Noncommissioned Officer Education System] requirement."

3.  U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command, Alexandria, memorandum, dated 15 October 2002, Subject:  Administrative Removal from the Promotion Selection List, informed the applicant that his name had been removed from the SFC promotion list based on his cancellation from ANCOC due to his failure to meet the standards of Army Regulation 600-9 [The Army Weight Control Program] and APFT.

4.  U.S. Army Total Army Personnel Command, Alexandria, Order Number 288-5, dated 15 October 2002, revoked the applicant's promotion to the rank of SFC. The order states that the applicant was administratively removed from the calendar year (CY) 200105 SFC Promotion List.  This order is found in the applicant's performance section of his iPERMS record.

5.  A DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) shows the applicant completed ANCOC on 21 July 2006.

6.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Order Number 226-42, dated 14 August 2006, promoted the applicant to SFC effective 1 September 2006.

7.  A review of the applicant's record located on iPERMS confirms his record contains three copies of the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command Memorandum, Subject:  Administrative Removal from the Promotion Selection List.  The performance portion of his iPERMS record includes two copies of this memorandum under the titles "Document Approving Recommendation for Removal from Promotion List" and "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction."  A third copy of this memorandum is found in the restricted portion of his iPERMS record under the title "Document Approving Recommendation for Removal from a Promotion List."

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This document states that only those documents listed in Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) and Table 2-2 are authorized for filing in the OMPF.  Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the OMPF in one of three sections:  performance, service, or restricted.

9.  Table 2-1 of this Army regulation shows that for promotions and reductions, the document approving removal from a Headquarters, Department of the Army promotion list will be filed in the restricted portion of the OMPF.

10.  Paragraph 2-3 (Composition of the OMPF) of Army Regulation 600-8-104 provides, in pertinent part, that the restricted portion of the OMPF is used for historical data that may normally be improper for viewing by selection boards or career managers.  The release of information in this section is controlled.  It may not be released without written approval from the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (for enlisted Soldiers, formerly designated as Commander, U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center) or the Headquarters, Department of the Army selection board proponent.  This paragraph also provides that documents in the restricted portion of the OMPF are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; show corrections to other parts of the OMPF; record investigation reports and appellate actions; and protect the interests of the Soldier and the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that the document with the title "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction" be removed from the performance portion of his iPERMS record.

2.  The applicant's iPERMS record contains two copies of this document in the performance portion and a third copy is filed in the restricted portion.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 shows that for promotions and reductions, the document approving removal from a Headquarters, Department of the Army, promotion list will be filed in the restricted portion of the OMPF.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove from the performance portion of his iPERMS the documents with the titles "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction" and "Document Approving Recommendation for Removal from Promotion List."



BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from the performance portion of his iPERMS record the documents titled, "Letter of Failure to Complete Army Service School Resident Course of Instruction" and "Document Approving Recommendation for Removal from Promotion List."





      __________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016074



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016074



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016778

    Original file (20080016778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the memorandum, subject: Administrative Removal from the Promotion Selection List, dated 22 December 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He states that he did not attend ANCOC and a memorandum was placed in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by transferring the memorandum, subject: Administrative Removal from the Promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005233C071108

    Original file (20070005233C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and she be reinstated to the grade of Sergeant First Class (SFC). Evidence shows that the applicant’s records were flagged effective 18 June 2003 through 14 April 2006. Evidence shows the applicant was selected for a conditional promotion for the grade of sergeant first class.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006075

    Original file (20090006075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a memorandum, subject: Promotion to SFC [sergeant first class] as an Exception to Policy, dated 16 January 2007, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed the required military education course (BNCOC) prior to being promoted to SFC/E-7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003319

    Original file (20110003319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 26 February 2008, be expunged from his record or in the alternative, transfer to the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant provides: * three DA Forms 1059, dated 26 February 2008, 22 May 2008, and 26 August 2008 * two DA Forms 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER), for the period 1 April 2007 through 31 March 2008 and 1 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010894

    Original file (20090010894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the applicant was selected for an assignment to the Army Recruiting Command. A DD Form 4/1 (Enlistments / Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) on file in the applicant's OMPF shows he reenlisted for 3 years in pay grade E-5 on 12 May 2000 to meet the service remaining requirements for and to accept assignment to the Recruiting Command. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012588

    Original file (20090012588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the OMPF in one of three sections: performance, service, or restricted. This paragraph also provides that documents in the restricted section of the OMPF are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; show corrections to other parts of the OMPF; record investigation reports and appellate actions; and protect the interests of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066098C070421

    Original file (2001066098C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the memorandum dated 1 July 1999, Subject: Denied Enrollment be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by moving the memorandum dated 1 July 1999 denying the applicant enrollment in ANCOC from his performance fiche to his restricted fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010746

    Original file (20070010746.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her record of punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 20 February 2003, be removed from her "P" (Performance) fiche, of her official military personnel file (OMPF), to the "R" (Restricted) fiche in order to compete with her peers for promotion. The applicant states, in effect, that in her previous application, she requested that the Article 15, under UCMJ, be removed in its entirety due to the fact that it had been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100689C070208

    Original file (2004100689C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the notification of his removal from the promotion selection list dated 26 June 2001 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This memorandum was filed in the applicant's P- fiche and not in the R-fiche, as it should have been. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: transferring the Memorandum from the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, which notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003083

    Original file (20150003083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. He was promoted to master sergeant (MSG) on 1 July 2010. e. In 2012, he petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to remove the GOMOR from his restricted folder. The applicant provided a memorandum from the Chief, Enlisted Promotions, Promotions Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 11 April 2014, which states: a. He contends the GOMOR should be removed from the restricted folder of his OMPF because: * it has been almost 12 years * he took...