Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015891
Original file (20090015891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	08 April 2010  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015891 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FM), be corrected to show she made a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within one year of their divorce.

2.  The applicant states her divorce decree shows she was awarded SBP and the FSM was responsible to pay any premiums due.  She was unaware the FSM had failed to submit the required form for former spouse coverage until she was notified of his death.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her divorce decree and the FSM's death certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 31 May 1989, the FSM was released from active duty and placed on the Retired List.  

2.  On 23 February 1989, the FSM had elected SBP spouse only coverage based on a reduced amount of $300.  The applicant, his spouse at the time, acknowledged she had been informed and counseled concerning the options under the SBP.  She concurred with the FSM's election on 23 February 1989.

3.  On 2 February 1996, the applicant and the FSM were divorced.  The Settle Agreement states, "The Wife shall be awarded her Survivor Benefit Plan.  The Husband shall be responsible for and pay, as each installment becomes due."

4.  There is no evidence the FSM made an SBP election for his former spouse within 1 year of their divorce.  The applicant did not submit a request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made within 1 year of divorce.

5.  On 18 July 2009, the FSM died.  His death certificate states his marital status as divorced.

6.  A telephone conversation with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) revealed the FSM did not change his SBP election to former spouse.  However, DFAS stated the FSM continued to pay his SBP premiums up until his death.

7.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

9.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends she should be allowed to make a deemed election for former spouse SBP benefits.  She was unaware until after his death that the FSM had not changed his SBP election in accordance with the court order.
2.  The FSM continued to pay SBP premiums up until his death, over 13 years after their divorce.  His death certificate shows he was divorced at the time of his death and there is no evidence he remarried.  Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show he intended to provide SBP benefits to the applicant as required by the court.

3.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, it is appropriate to correct the FSM's military records to show the applicant submitted a written request within 1 year of the date of divorce for a deemed election and that the election of former spouse coverage based on the reduced amount be deemed to have been made.

BOARD VOTE:

____X__  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant submitted a timely written request that the election of former spouse coverage under the SBP based on the reduced base amount of the FSM's retired pay be deemed to have been made and that this request was timely received and processed by DFAS within 1 year of the date of their divorce, and that the applicant be paid the SBP annuity retroactive to the day after the FSM's death.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015891





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015891



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020113

    Original file (20140020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his survivor benefit plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" (FS) within 1 year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant's applied to DFAS for an SBP annuity; however, on 22 February 2014, DFAS responded to her request denying an SBP annuity due to the FSM never making a valid request to change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014647

    Original file (20090014647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 September 1952, the FSM accepted an appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the U.S. Army in the infantry branch and was ordered to active duty. There is no record to show the applicant completed and filed with DFAS a request for deemed election within 1 year of her divorce from the FSM. As the applicant was receiving a partial payment of her former spouse's retired pay based on filing the divorce decree, it is reasonable to assume she thought she had made a deemed election...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017745

    Original file (20130017745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Even though the FSM continued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020032

    Original file (20110020032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 July 1989, the FSM completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse and dependent children coverage at the full amount. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS in which she was informed that she was not entitled to receive an annuity under the SBP because the FSM's military retired pay record reflected he did not make a request to change his election to former spouse coverage nor was a deemed election for former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021259

    Original file (20130021259.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provided correspondence from DFAS to her Member of Congress dated 23 September 2013 wherein DFAS stated, "At the time of his retirement, [the FSM] elected SBP spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548

    Original file (20090001548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSM’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026946

    Original file (20100026946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that when the FSM retired in 2006, he elected SBP for spouse coverage. In 2008, the FSM and the applicant were divorced. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of their divorce in February 2008; b. showing his request was timely received and processed by the appropriate DFAS office; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003460

    Original file (20090003460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record confirms the FSM initially elected SBP coverage for “spouse and children” at the time of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024561

    Original file (20100024561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * the FSM's Last Will and Testament, dated 4 April 1969 * Divorce Complaint, dated 1 May 1991 * Divorce Decree, dated 28 June 1991 (middle name incorrect) * a letter, dated 16 April 1992, to the applicant from the FSM * the FSM's Death Certificate * the applicant's DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity) * a letter, dated 7 April 2010, to the applicant from the Defense Finance and Accounting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017588

    Original file (20120017588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 21 August 1995 and the FSM's election changed to no beneficiary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at...