Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014413
Original file (20090014413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014413 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Grenade Bar.

2.  The applicant states he was at Fort Gordon, GA at the time.  He also states his expert rifle and grenade badge were lost in a fire and he wants to replace them so he can pass them on to his son.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 January 1980.  He did not complete initial entry training and was not awarded a military occupational specialty.  The highest rank and grade the applicant attained during his military service was private (PV1)/E-1.

3.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations & Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) is blank.

4.  The applicant's record is devoid of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he qualified with any weapon during his tenure in the Army.

5.  On 26 March 1980, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-33 (Trainee Discharge Program (TDP)).  The commander stated the specific reasons for this action were:

	a.  he could not or would not adapt socially or emotionally to military life.

	b.  he could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful training because of a lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.

6.  The commander informed the applicant that the final decision in his case rested with the approving authority.  If his separation was approved, his service would be characterized as honorable.  However, if he did not have sufficient prior military service, he should understand that due to noncompletion of requisite active duty time, Veterans Administration and other benefits normally associated with completion of honorable active duty service would be affected.  Furthermore, he would not be permitted to reenter the U.S. Army within two years from the date of his separation.

7.  The commander advised the applicant of his rights to present any rebuttal or statement in his own behalf to the approving authority and to request a separation physical if he felt his physical status had changed since his last examination.

8.  On 26 March 1980, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the commander’s notification of intent to separate him under the provisions of the TDP and the possible effects of a separation of this nature.  He also declined to submit a statement in his own behalf or to have a separation medical examination.


9.  On 26 March 1980, the applicant's immediate commander recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of the TDP.

10.  On 1 April 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge and directed that he be furnished a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate).

11.  On 4 April 1980, the applicant was discharged.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he completed a total of 2 months and 27 days of creditable active military service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) contains the entry "NA" indicating "Not Applicable."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Grenade Bar was carefully considered.

2.  Evidence shows the applicant was discharged prior to completing initial entry training.

3.  The applicant's record is devoid of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he qualified with any weapon during his tenure in the Army.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014413



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014413



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012469

    Original file (20100012469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * three self-authored letters, dated 21 March 2010, 30 May 2010, and 13 July 2010 * an appeal from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Washington, DC, dated 20 October 2008 * a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * a DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part I) * a DD Form 1966/5 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 21 March 2010, he submitted a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003653C070208

    Original file (20040003653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of the applicant’s DA Form 2- 1 shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Senior Parachutist Badge, Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR)-Numeral 2, Army Service Ribbon (ASR), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle, Mortar and Automatic Rifle Bars, and Marksman Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar. Thus, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002718

    Original file (20120002718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, he should not have been discharged from the Army under the Trainee Discharge Program. On 30 July 1979, his commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-33 (TDP).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017808

    Original file (20090017808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60) * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * award of "wings" * he received a letter of appreciation and a letter of commendation * his rank/pay grade at the time of his relief from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019601

    Original file (20080019601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) issued to the applicant upon his 30 November 1996 discharge from the SCARNG shows that as of that date, he had earned the following awards during his military service tenure: AGCM (4th Award), NDSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR (4th Award), and AAM. The applicant also provides an MFO, Sinai certificate that indicates he served with the MFO from 2 November 1990 through 4 March 1991. The evidence of record fails to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014015C071029

    Original file (20060014015C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This award is already shown on the applicant's DD Forms 214, with effective dates of 24 June 1977 and 3 March 1982; therefore, this badge will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. He is therefore entitled to have this marksmanship qualification badge added to his DD Forms 214 with discharge dates of 24 June 1977 and 3 March 1982. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020406

    Original file (20140020406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1980 by adding the following awards: * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar (M-1 Rifle) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) (shown as AR-16) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar * Second Award, Oak Leaf Cluster (no award identified) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011412

    Original file (20100011412.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 6 January 1979 DD Form 214 to show the following awards: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with rifle bar * Overseas Service Ribbon * All unit citations 2. While the evidence of record verifies the applicant's service in Germany from July 1976 to January 1979, he is not entitled to the award of the Overseas...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011311C071029

    Original file (20060011311C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his final separation document (DD Form 214), dated 19 January 1984, be corrected by adding an Achievement Medal for 1984, the 2nd Award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), an Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar, and the Food Service Primary Technical Course he completed. However, the evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded an achievement medal by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006993

    Original file (20080006993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not include the CIB, and his record is void of any orders or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty. Therefore, absent any evidence that he held and served in an infantry MOS in the RVN, or that he was ever awarded the CIB by proper authority, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CIB has not been met in this case, and it would not be...