Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019601
Original file (20080019601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019601 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Multi-National Force Observer (MFO) Medal.   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he served with the MFO, Sinai, Egypt, during Operation Desert Storm, but the MFO Medal was not included in the list of awards contained in his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  DD Form 214, MFO Medal application, Army Achievement Medal (AAM) certificate, MFO certificate, and Operation Desert Storm awards memorandum.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 19 June 1980, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  

3.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he 
was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 1 September 1989 and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  Item 5 (Overseas Service) 
shows the applicant completed overseas tours in Germany and Korea.  

4.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations & Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows that during his active duty tenure the applicant earned the Army Service Ribbon (ASR), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award), Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) (4th Award), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

5.  Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows that during the period between 26 June 1986 and 4 August 1992 he was assigned to B Company, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment, Fort Drum, New York, performing duties as an infantry team leader.  Item 33 (Date) shows that the applicant last reviewed his DA Form 2-1 on 10 September 1993.  

6.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or other documents (i.e., certificates, etc) indicating that he ever served in the Sinai, Egypt, as part of the MFO, or that he was ever awarded the MFO Medal.  

7.  On 30 November 1993, the applicant as honorably discharged, in the rank of SGT, by reason of early release program-special separation benefit, after completing 13 years, 5 months and 12 days of active military service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:  AGCM (4th Award), NDSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR (4th Award), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  The applicant authenticated the DD Form 214 with his signature in Item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) on the date of his discharge.  

8.  On 1 December 1993, the applicant enlisted in the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG).  He served in this status for 3 years until being honorably discharged, by reason of expiration of service obligation, on
30 November 1996.
9.  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) issued to the applicant upon his 30 November 1996 discharge from the SCARNG shows that as of that date, he had earned the following awards during his military service tenure:  AGCM (4th Award), NDSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR (4th Award), and AAM.  The MFO Medal was not included in this list of awards.  

10.  The applicant provides an AAM certificate that indicates he was awarded the AAM for his meritorious achievement during the period 4 November 1990 through 5 March 1991, while assigned to B Company, 2d Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment.  The citation reads that the applicant's outstanding efforts enabled the Task Force to successfully complete its MFO peacekeeping mission in the Sinai, Egypt.  The applicant also provides an MFO, Sinai certificate that indicates he served with the MFO from 2 November 1990 through 4 March 1991. 

11.  Finally, the applicant provides a memorandum issued by his SCARNG unit, dated 6 December 1994, which indicates the applicant was a member of
B Company, 2d Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment during Operation Desert Shield/Storm, and was part of the MFO from 20 November 1990 through             4 November 1991.  It further indicates that after the applicant departed the unit, it was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), Kuwait Liberation Medal, and a combat patch for its service during the period identified.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 9-12 contains guidance on award of the MFO Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that to qualify for this award on or after 15 March 1985, members must have served with the MFO for 6 months (170 days minimum).  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be awarded the MFO medal and it should be added to his record and separation document was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to qualify for the MFO on or after 15 March 1985, a member must have served with the MFO for 6 months 
(170 days minimum).  

2.  The evidence of record fails to show the applicant served in the MFO, Sinai, Egypt for 170 days, or that he was ever awarded the MFO by proper authority while serving on active duty.  The documents provided by the applicant are not corroborated by the evidence of record; however, if they were, they show he served in the MFO, Sinai from 2 or 20 November 1990 through 4 March 1991, which at best is a total of 123 days, which is well short of the 170 day minimum required for the award.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the requested relief. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019601



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019601



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001574

    Original file (20150001574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and to show his foreign service in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the ARCOM, and to show his foreign service in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm, was carefully considered. His DD Form 214 shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003367

    Original file (20150003367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the dates do not match up exactly with the dates for the Army Achievement Medal, they both show the starting month/year as November 1990 and the ending month/year as March 1991. Regarding his deployment to Cuba, the preponderance of the evidence also appears to support the applicant's request: (1) Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), with an entry dated 28 January 1992 which appears to show GITMO - Cuba below the date. Adding to item 18 of his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011316

    Original file (20130011316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his 6-month deployment in the Sinai, Egypt and his 2-month deployment in Cuba. He states his DD Form 214 should show 8 months of foreign service. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016584

    Original file (20130016584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of the Infantry School and Air Assault School * award of the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal * his service during Operation Desert Storm and all corresponding medals 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years, 8 months, and 7 days of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010939

    Original file (20110010939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. However, his OMPF contains evidence to support only three awards, the one award that is not documented in the applicant's records is the fourth award for the period 15 to 25 June 1989 for his support to ROTC Camp Adventure, Fort Lewis. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009718

    Original file (20080009718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the criteria in this case for award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001844C070205

    Original file (20060001844C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that her unit was awarded a unit citation while she was assigned and she should have received this award. The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record shows, in Item 5 (Overseas Service), that she served in Germany from 3 March 1981 through 28 October 1983, and that this is the only overseas service she performed while serving on active duty. Further, the award the members of her unit received upon their return from Egypt was most likely the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015455

    Original file (20090015455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, he requests the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the Multinational Forces Observer (MFO) Medal be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant states that he received the AAM and the Multinational Forces Observer Medal while on active duty. The available records do not show he was awarded the AAM and the MFO Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018442

    Original file (20070018442.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12f (Foreign Service) and Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 11 January 2001 Separation Document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The evidence of record also fails to provide any indication that the applicant served in combat or was recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011064

    Original file (20090011064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Recommendation for Award of the Army Achievement Medal that the applicant submitted shows the Army Achievement Medal was approved in Permanent Orders Number 001-002, on 5 March 1991. While his records show that he was assigned to the Scout Platoon in the Sinai Peninsula of the Arab Republic of Egypt from 20 November 1990 through 25 February 1991, Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Syria and Jordan...