Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014317
Original file (20090014317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  28 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014317 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show a date of entry on active duty of 11 February 1961 and to show his height as 6 feet tall.

2.  The applicant states he is 6 feet tall.  He is not 5 feet, 10 inches or 5 feet, 2 inches as shown on his DD Forms 214.  He entered the service on 11 February 1961, not 11 March 1961, and believes the information was incorrectly entered due to simple administrative errors.

3.  The applicant provides copies of two DD Forms 214 and his driver's license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant enlisted in the Arkansas Army National Guard (ARARNG) on 27 February 1961 and listed his height as 69 inches (5 feet, 9 inches).

3.  A DA Form 24 (Service Record) provides the following information:

	a.  enlistment in the ARARNG on 27 February 1961 and

	b.  entry on active duty on 11 March 1961.

4.  A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following information:

	a.  his height as 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches;

	b.  enlistment in the ARARNG on 27 February 1961;

	c.  assignment to basic training with the ARARNG on 27 February 1961;

	d.  assignment to active duty basic combat training on 16 March 1961;

	e.  assignment to advanced individual training on 29 May 1961;

	f.  assignment to a basic training unit on 24 July 1961; and

	g.  release from active duty and return to the ARARNG on 1 September 1961.

5.  A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) shows the applicant's height as "61 1/2" (5 feet, 1 1/2 inches).

6.  A 1 September 1961 DD Form 214 lists the applicant's period of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) as 11 March 1961 through 1 September 1961.  His height is listed as 5 feet, 10 inches.

7.  A 13 April 1965 DD Form 214 shows his service on active duty from 19 April 1963 through 13 April 1965.  His height is listed as 5 feet, 2 inches.

8.  A 15 December 1965 National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the U.S. Army National Guard of Arkansas) shows the applicant's periods of service as in the ARARNG from 27 February 1961 through 18 April 1963 and in the U.S. Army from 19 April 1963 through 13 April 1965.  It shows a period of ACDUTRA of 6 months from 11 March 1961 through 1 September 1961.  His height is listed as 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches.
9.  The applicant's driver's license lists his height as 6 feet.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he is 6 feet tall not 5 feet, 10 inches or 5 feet, 2 inches.  He entered the service on 11 February 1961 not 11 March 1961 and believes that due to simple administrative errors the information was entered incorrectly.

2.  The applicant's official military documents show his height as varying from 5 feet, 1 1/2 inches to 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches.  Although his driver's license shows his current height as 6 feet, none of the official military documents show a height of 6 feet.  The difference between the greatest height recorded in the applicant's official military records of 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches and the applicant's assertion of a height of 6 feet could be based on a growth of 1/2 inch since his period of service, the presence or absence of shoes, or an administrative determination of not recording 1/2-inch increments.  The height shown on a driver's license is provided by the licensed driver and is not validated by the licensing facility.

3.  Based on the disparity of heights recorded in official military documents and that of the applicant's current driver's license, it is reasonable to assume that the applicant was 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches tall at the time of the issuance of the DD Forms 214.  Therefore, it is appropriate to correct these documents to show his height as 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches.

4.  The applicant did not enlist in the ARARNG until 27 February 1961.  He is shown to have entered active duty for training on 11 March 1963; therefore, the date of 11 March 1963 is correct on the 1 September 1961 DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Forms 214 to show his height as 5 feet, 11 1/2 inches.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing his date of entry on active duty as 11 February 1961 and his height as 6 feet.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014317



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014317



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021651

    Original file (20090021651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable * correction of item 7a (Race) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Black" * correction of item 7e (Height) of his DD Form 214 to show 73 inches * correction of item 33 (Permanent Address for Mailing Purposes After Transfer of Discharge) of his DD Form 214 to show Blackshear, Georgia 2. There is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100746C070208

    Original file (2004100746C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paul Smith | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show: that he is 5 feet, 8 inches tall; that he was separated in the rank of staff sergeant; that he was a full time employee in the West Virginia Army National Guard; that he attended the Single Rotor Observation Helicopter Maintenance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000937

    Original file (20080000937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 10 (Date of Birth) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 31 October 1930 and correction of item 12 (Description) to show his race as Hispanic and his height as 5 feet and 2 inches. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. This document is accepted as sufficient evidence as a basis to amend item 10 on his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076791C070215

    Original file (2002076791C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that his records be corrected to show his middle name as “_ _ler”, to show his height as “5 feet and 11 inches” and to show his weight as “135.” Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence available to the Board shows the applicant’s middle name as “_ _ ler.” However, at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009189

    Original file (20060009189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As there is no evidence which conclusively shows he was assigned to an infantry MOS, and that he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size while it was engaged in combat with the enemy, there is no basis for awarding the Combat Infantryman Badge to the applicant in this case. It is noted that on 20 May 1994, the United States Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Medical Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058569C070421

    Original file (2001058569C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was improving on his physical training run. On 5 and 10 January 1991, he was counseled for failing the APFT. The evidence of record does not show any reason why the applicant’s chain of command should have referred him for mental health counseling.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019669

    Original file (20130019669.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 51 (Height) of his Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) shows he was 72 1/2 inches (approximately 6'1"). Therefore, the entry on his induction record that shows his place of birth is Lawrenceburg, TN is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base amending item 5 of his DD Form 214. Therefore, these items should be corrected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011838

    Original file (20080011838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2 December 1987. However, there is no evidence the applicant was recommended for an award based on this incident. There is no evidence to show why the applicant was not promoted from the promotion list dated 30 January 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007182C070206

    Original file (20050007182C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the united States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 2 September 1965 be corrected to show his Social Security Account Number (SSAN), his height and weight and award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar for qualifying with the M-14 Rifle as shown in his records. Evidence of record shows when the applicant's entered the service his SSAN was xxx-xx-xxx8. The applicant's available service records...