Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000937
Original file (20080000937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  26 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000937 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 10 (Date of Birth) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 31 October 1930 and correction of item 12 (Description) to show his race as Hispanic and his height as 5 feet and 2 inches.

2.  The applicant states that he has never been a tall man.  He states that he is Hispanic and was born in October.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate; his DD Form 214; and his driver’s license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 August 1952.  He completed infantry training and was awarded military occupational specialty number 1745 (infantryman).  

4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 16 July 1954 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on the following date.  

5.  Headquarters, 7502nd Army Unit Personnel Center, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, Special Orders Number 140, dated 16 July 1954, releasing the applicant from active duty, show his Home of Record as Yabucoa, Puerto Rico and his DOB as 30 August 1930.  

6.  Item 10 on his DD Form 214 shows his DOB as 30 August 1930.

7.  Item 12 on his DD Form 214 shows his race as Caucasian and his height as 62 inches.  

8.  The applicant provided his birth certificate which shows he was born in Yabucoa, Puerto Rico on 31 October 1930.  

9.  His driver’s license shows his DOB as 31 October 1930 and his height as 5 feet and 2 inches.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s birth certificate verifies that his DOB is 31 October 1930.  This document is accepted as sufficient evidence as a basis to amend item 10 on his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as 31 October 1930.  

2.  The applicant’s birth certificate shows he was born in Puerto Rico.  Based on this and the applicant’s assertion, it would be appropriate to amend his race in item 12 on his DD Form 214 from Caucasian to Hispanic (even though “Hispanic” is an ethnic designation rather than a race classification).  

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 currently reflects his height as 62 inches in item 12.  This unit of measurement is the same as 5 feet and 2 inches.  Therefore, there is no basis for amending item 12 on his DD Form 214 to show his height as 5 feet and 2 inches.  


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

xx______  xx______  xx______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending item 10 on his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as 31 October 1930; and 

	b.  amending item 12 on his DD Form 214 to show his race as Hispanic.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 12 on his DD Form 214 to show his height as 5 feet and 2 inches.



      xxxxxxx____   ___
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000937





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000937



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02148

    Original file (BC 2014 02148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057867C070420

    Original file (2001057867C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be corrected to list his race as Caucasian. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003015

    Original file (20070003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows, at the time of the applicant’s separation from active duty, the instructions for recording entries in Item 12 (Description – Race) of the DD Form 214 state to enter the Race precisely as shown on the enlistment record filed with the Service Record. The applicant’s military Service Record is not available to the Board. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the applicant’s Race (i.e., being recorded as Black);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018233

    Original file (20100018233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his birth certificate shows his year of birth as 1947. The applicant's birth certificate shows he was born in 1947. There is no record of what document was used to verify his DOB at the time of induction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002210

    Original file (20130002210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his race as Hispanic or Latino and to show he was awarded or authorized the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). It is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020948

    Original file (20110020948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020948 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's new birth certificate shows he was born in 1947. There is no record of what document was used to verify his DOB at the time of induction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009059

    Original file (20120009059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Birth Certificate * DD Form 214 * Certificate of Service CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence the applicant submitted is not sufficient to show an error exists or to change the DOB shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005995

    Original file (20080005995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He now requests his military records corrected. Counsel requests correction of the applicant’s military records to show his correct name, date of birth, and place of birth. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, dated 24 November 1969, be corrected to show his correct name as “Roxxxxo Rxxxxa-Vxxa,” his DOB as “29 July 1947,” and place of birth as “Arecibo, Puerto Rico.” 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014445

    Original file (20080014445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show his date of birth (DOB) as "2 February 1931." The evidence shows that the DOB entered on the applicant's DD Form 214 is verified by his entire service record. The applicant reported his DOB as 25 July 1930 throughout his time in the service and signed his DD Form 214 attesting to its accuracy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011838

    Original file (20080011838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2 December 1987. However, there is no evidence the applicant was recommended for an award based on this incident. There is no evidence to show why the applicant was not promoted from the promotion list dated 30 January 2006.