Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013572
Original file (20090013572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013572 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).  

2.  The applicant states the ARCOM's are not listed on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and two award certificates for the ARCOM in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 March 1998 and continued to serve on active duty through one reenlistment.

3.  The applicant’s award certificate, dated 2 May 2003, shows he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service from 26 November 2002 to 30 April 2003 by Headquarters, 2nd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) (Forward), Permanent Order 122-160, dated 2 May 2003.

4.  The applicant’s award certificate, dated 15 June 2003, shows he was awarded the ARCOM with valor for action on 3 April 2003 by Headquarters, 2nd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized) (Forward), Permanent Order 166-066, dated 15 June 2003.  

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 14 November 2003.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the ARCOM.  

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), provides, in pertinent part, that the bronze “V” Device indicates acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy and authorizes the bronze “V” Device in conjunction with awards of the ARCOM, the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part, that the first Oak Leaf Cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the ARCOM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Permanent orders confirm the applicant is authorized two awards of the ARCOM, one for meritorious service and one for valor.  Therefore, these awards should be added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the ARCOM (First Oak Leaf Cluster) with “V” Device.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013572



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013572



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013992

    Original file (20080013992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a SSG promotion list, ARCAM award memorandum, ARCOM with “V” Device certificates, and DD Form 214 in support of his application. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded two separate awards of the ARCOM with “V” Device, for actions in Iraq on 15 August 2004 and on 14 November 2004, and that he was awarded the ARCOM for achievement on 10 May 2004, as evidenced by DA Forms 638 and ARCOM certificates on file in his OMPF. As a result, given there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017797

    Original file (20090017797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant requests two Army Commendation Medals, two Army Achievement Medals, the Combat Infantryman Badge and Certificates of Achievement be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005792

    Original file (20080005792.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 November 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005792 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd Award). The applicant's record shows he enlisted into the Regular Army and entered active duty on 27 February 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000956

    Original file (20150000956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 1987 to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting award of the VSM from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1987...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028964

    Original file (20100028964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 should show the Army Good Conduct Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal, GWOTSM, and any other authorized awards. In light of progression to pay grade E-4 and his other awards, especially three Army Commendation Medals and the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Good Conduct Medal should be awarded for the period 26 April 2001 through 25 April 2004 at this time and it should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017783

    Original file (20130017783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 3d Brigade, 3d Infantry Division (Mechanized), Permanent Order Number 300-012, dated 27 October 2005, shows he was awarded the ARCOM with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster for meritorious service during the period 18 January 2005 to 31 December 2005. However, based on his second tour of duty in Kuwait/Iraq in 2005 and participation in one campaign, he is authorized award of the ICM with one bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000644

    Original file (20080000644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Letter, dated 12 December 2007; DD Form 214; Department of the Army (DA) PUC General Orders (GO) Number (#) 25, dated 8 June 2001 and GO # 75, dated 2 December 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66); and Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division Special Orders (SO) # 32, dated 1 February 1968. However, the evidence of record confirms his entitlement to one award of the PUC based on his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017135

    Original file (20090017135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd Award), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 38 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 also shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments, and his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018365

    Original file (20130018365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. c. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the AGCM at the time of the applicant's separation processing, based on the available evidence, and notwithstanding 2 days bad time, it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal. As a result, the...