Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013411
Original file (20090013411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013411 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states he was given the ARCOM for Operation Desert Storm by the 776th Maintenance Company, Elizabethton, TN, but it is not in his records.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 25 November 1991, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant had prior service in the Regular Army and enlisted in the Army National Guard on 4 August 1990.  He was ordered to active duty on 12 September 1990 in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm and served in Southwest Asia from 25 October 1990 to 9 May 1991.

3.  There are no orders which indicate the applicant was awarded the ARCOM.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not list the ARCOM.

4.  He was released from active duty on 10 June 1991.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 June 1991 does not show the ARCOM as an authorized award.

5.  The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 215 for the period ending 10 June 1991 which also does not show the ARCOM as an authorized award.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends he was given the ARCOM for Operation Desert Storm by his unit, the 776th Maintenance Company, Elizabethton, TN.  However, there are no orders, certificate, or any other evidence available which indicate he was awarded the ARCOM.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the ARCOM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005116

    Original file (20140005116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 documenting this period of service shows he was awarded MOS 11C1P and held this MOS for 2 years and 8 months. A DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty from 10 to 14 June 1991. Although the record shows he held PMOS 11C1P when he was ordered to active duty on 16 June 1991, it appears he was awarded MOS 75B1O during this period of active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022143

    Original file (20120022143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records contain a DD Form 215, dated 6 February 1992. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant served in SWA in support of Operation Desert Storm from 17 February through 24 April 1991 as evidenced by entries in item 18 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 May 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the KLM-SA and KLM-KU to his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018855

    Original file (20090018855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his Gulf War deployment be documented on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and he be issued a DD Form 215 (DD Form 214 Correction). The record contains permanent deployment and award orders which confirm the applicant was deployed to SWA in support of Desert Storm for the period of 14 February 1991 through 2 May 1991. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his deployment time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021217

    Original file (20120021217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), but it was not entered on her DD Form 214. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008753

    Original file (20090008753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to document his foreign service and all earned awards. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record and DD Form 214 to document SWA service from 1 January through 13 June 1991, as confirmed by the DFAS record by amending item 12f and item 18 accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018267

    Original file (20110018267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous application for correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her foreign service in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm and awards authorized for that service. Army Regulation 635-5, currently in effect, states the DD Form 214 of an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service will have the statement "SERVICE IN (name of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003261C070206

    Original file (20050003261C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the MSM and ARCOM during his active duty tenure, as evidenced by entries in Item 9 of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 and documents on file in his MPRJ. In this case, the award documents on file in the applicant’s record confirm he served in the primary duty of driver during his assignment to SWA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019603

    Original file (20080019603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 30 April 1991 to show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to Army Soldiers who participated in Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006455

    Original file (20090006455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) to Army members who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990. Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states that the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008984

    Original file (20100008984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DD Form 214 * two DD Forms 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) * DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)) Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 2-7 of Army Regulation 635-5 states that a new DD Form 214 will be issued when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...