Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012982
Original file (20090012982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  2 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090012982 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 December 1991 be corrected to show he completed 05 06 11 (5 years, 6 months, and 11 days) of net active service this period instead of 04 06 11 (4 years, 6 months, and 11 days).  He also requests payment of any money due under the "Voluntary Early Termination Program" (presumed to be the Special Separation Benefit [SSB] incentive).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the error in item 12c of his DD Form 214 caused him to be ineligible for the SSB incentive.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his 
DD Form 214 and an undated letter from the U.S. Army Chemical and Military Police Centers, Fort McClellan, AL.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service in the U. S. Army Reserve during which he completed 7 months and 29 days of active service and 1 year, 7 months, and    29 days of inactive service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 June 1986.  On 4 January 1989, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years.

3.  On 13 December 1991, the applicant was discharged by reason of expiration term of service and the Holiday Early Transition Program.  During that enlistment he had completed 5 years, 6 months, and 11 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.  He had no time lost.  

4.  Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214 contains the entry 86 06 03 (1986 June 03) and Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) contains the entry 91 12 13 (1991 December 13).  Item 12c of his 
DD Form 214 contains the entry 04 06 11.	

5.  U.S. Army Chemical and Military Police Centers Fort McClellan, AL Orders 317-216, dated 13 November 1991, assigned the applicant to the Transition Point at Fort McClellan to report 1 December 1991.   Additional instructions in these orders show the applicant was authorized 12 days transition leave.

6.  On 14 December 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) for a period of 1 year.  He was discharged from the ALARNG and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group, St. Louis, MO, on 
8 February 1992 due to an incompatible occupation.  On 14 September 1993, he was honorably discharged from the Ready Reserve.

7.  An undated letter from the U.S. Army Chemical and Military Police Centers Fort McClellan, addressed to the Army Personnel Center, St Louis, MO, requested that a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) be issued to correct item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show "05 06 11."  However, there is no evidence a DD Form 215 was ever issued.

8.  Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) message, date time group 202100Z, December 1991, announced two voluntary incentive programs available to Soldiers who were fully qualified for retention but were voluntarily separated.  The SSB was one of these incentives.  Soldiers who applied for the SSB were required to enter into a written agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than 3 years, in addition to any remaining military service obligation based on statue, following the separation from active duty.  To be eligible an individual must have served in an active duty status more than 
6 years before 5 December 1991, but less than 20 years at time of separation and must have served at least 5 years of continuous active duty immediately preceding the date of separation.  HQDA stated that the SSB incentive program was effective 1 January 1992 and would not be retroactive to Soldiers who separated prior to that date.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation provided, in pertinent part, that the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for which the DD Form 214 was being issued would be entered in Item 12a of the 
DD Form 214.  This regulation also provided that the date of separation would be entered in Item 12b and that the net service for the period shown would be computed by subtracting Item 12a from Item 12b and then by deducting any lost time and non-creditable service after the date of discharge. 

10.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R provides, in pertinent part, that when computing a period of service each month is considered to have 30 days regardless of the actual number of days in the month.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the net service on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 13 December 1991 should be corrected.  He also contends that based on this correction he should be paid an SSB incentive.

2.  Subtracting Item 12a from Item 12b of the applicant's DD Form 214 clearly shows Item 12c is incorrect.  The applicant's net active service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 is 5 years, 6 months, and 11 days.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 13 December 1991 to show he completed “05 06 11” of net active service this period.

3.  The SSB program was formally announced on 20 December 1991 and it was not effective until 1 January 1992.  This was the earliest date he could have signed an agreement for the SSB incentive.  The applicant was discharged on
13 December 1991.  The SSB incentive was not retroactive.  Therefore, based on his date of separation, the applicant was not eligible for the SSB incentive.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
deleting the entry in Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 13 December 1991 and adding “05 06 11."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to payment of an SSB incentive. 




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012982



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012982



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024929

    Original file (20100024929.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1992 to show a date of entry of 9 June 1991. It states for: a. item 12a, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued; b. item 12c, enter the amount of service this period, computed by subtracting item 12a from 12b (Separation Date This Period); and c. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020175

    Original file (20100020175.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 ending 1 August 1985, 21 June 1991, and 17 August 2002; his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for the period 1-31 January 1978; Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement prepared on 2 July 2002; Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records), dated 31 May 2007; a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, dated 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010085C071029

    Original file (20060010085C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A), dated 18 October 1985; Enlistment Contract (DD Form 4/1,4/2 and 4/3); Verification of Personnel Data (DD Form 1966/1-/8); Statements of Enlistment (DA Forms 3286- 40 and 3280-5); Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) Travel Orders 196-5, dated 30 September 2003; Dental Treatment Record (SF 608); Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders, dated 23 February 1984;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017929

    Original file (20110017929.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 27 July 2008 as follows: * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) to list the military occupational specialties (MOS) of: * 54B (NBC (Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical) Specialist) * U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) MOS for Weapons Instructor * Item 12a (Date Entered AD (Active Duty) This Period) to show the correct date he entered on AD * Item 12c (Net Active Service This...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011029

    Original file (20100011029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered military service on 2 February 1985. An electronic PQR shows the applicant's pay entry basic date (PEBD) as "850202" [2 February 1985]. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 14 September 2000 incorrectly shows the date he entered active duty for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011913C071108

    Original file (20060011913C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service. Evidence also shows that he was issued a second DD Form 214 for his period of active service which began on 14 December 1978. The applicant was placed on the TDRL on 12 January 1994, was sent for periodic TDRL evaluations, and did not perform any further active duty service from that date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020291

    Original file (20120020291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence to show that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 February 1979 is in error. The applicant's active duty service and prior inactive service appear to be correct on her DD Form 214 for the period end 31 May 1997.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007596

    Original file (20100007596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 12c (Net Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 10 September 2007 be corrected. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that entries for the DD Form 214 include: * item 12a – the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for which the DD Form 214 is being issued * item 12b – the date of separation * net service for the period shown is computed by subtracting item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013781

    Original file (20130013781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 lists in the following items: * 11 - 91C (Practical Nurse) - 20 years and 10 months * 12a - the entry date of 6 October 1988 * 12b - the separation date of 31 July 1991 * 12c - 2 years, 9 months, and 26 days * 12d - 18 years, 5 months, and 8 days * Item 18 (Remarks) - Immediate Reenlistments This Period: 20 December 1976 through 16 December 1982, 17 December 1982 through 5 October 1988 9. For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month * Item 12a - would list the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015433

    Original file (20110015433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Soldiers who serve 11 cumulative months in a 24-month period or 9 months continuous in Iraq or Afghanistan get credit for a completed short tour. His cumulative service in Iraq and Afghanistan also entitles him to award of the OSR and to have this award added to his DD Form 214.