Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012033
Original file (20090012033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  19 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090012033 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has provided an eyewitness statement that shows he was wounded while assigned to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum from Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3) W______ F. C______, dated 7 June 2009, as a witness statement in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090001134, dated 17 March 2009.

2.  The applicant provided a copy of an eyewitness statement which is considered new evidence and merits consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant submitted an eyewitness statement from a Soldier who states that he saw blood on the applicant's uniform and that the uniform was torn.  He also states that he personally looked at the applicant's shoulder and saw numerous lacerations and told him to get checked out, but due to his own oversight, failed to follow-up with the applicant or his injuries.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Witness statements, by themselves, are not sufficient evidence upon which to base a correction of the applicant's records.  There is no evidence in his service personnel records which show that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds.  In the absence of official documents that show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090001134, dated 17 March 2009.



      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012033



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008605

    Original file (20100008605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicantÂ’s self-authored statement and eyewitness statements are new evidence that warrant consideration by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007228

    Original file (20100007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant's service personnel records. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008953

    Original file (20090008953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was among the wounded. The available evidence also shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of being hit by nails from a claymore on 11 April 1969. Evidence of record shows that although he received orders for a Purple Heart for wounds received on 4 August 1969 while assigned to the 12th Evacuation Hospital there is no evidence of record nor did the applicant provide any evidence which shows he was wounded on 4 August 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010761

    Original file (20070010761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a second letter written by the eyewitness to the FSM's daughter, the eyewitness states, in effect, he believes that the FSM did not receive the Purple Heart due to the statements he [the FSM] made while he was still in the military. This, he states, could be the case with her father. The eyewitness' statements in support of the FSM being awarded the Purple Heart were considered; however, his statements are insufficient to reverse the decision of the Board, especially in view of the fact...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005946

    Original file (20080005946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter essentially stated, in pertinent part, that while being hit hard by the enemy, the FSM, who was a medic, was running everywhere doing for everybody. The evidence provided by the applicant was carefully considered. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the FSM was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel at the time for wounds or injuries received as a result of hostile action, and that this medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078530C070215

    Original file (2002078530C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a personal account of his wounding, dated 5 June 2002. In this addendum, the former platoon leader attests that he was the applicant's platoon leader at the time of his wounding, that he was physically present at the time of the applicant's wounding by enemy ground fire, and that he personally saw the wound as the applicant received field medical treatment. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002796

    Original file (20090002796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080001285 on 17 April 2008. While the physician at the DVA CBOC in Guam essentially stated that the applicant had a well-healed scar on his right forearm, the fact that he also stated that the applicant reported that he sustained a wound to his right forearm while serving in Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020054

    Original file (20090020054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * his injury was not recorded in his service record * it may have been lost or destroyed * he was discharged in Vienna, Austria * he could not locate any witnesses 3. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017273

    Original file (20080017273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also provided 1966 service medical records which state, in pertinent part, that he was in an aircraft accident in August 1965, that he had a crash in a helicopter in Vietnam in August 1965, and that he injured his back. The 1966 service medical records provided by the applicant state, in pertinent part, that he was in an aircraft accident in August 1965. Since the preponderance of evidence in this case shows the applicant was not wounded or treated for injuries as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015421

    Original file (20100015421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which show the applicant was awarded MOS 11B. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant alone are not sufficient as a basis for...