Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012004
Original file (20090012004.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  3 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090012004 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his award of the Silver Star and three awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was awarded the Silver Star and three awards of the Purple Heart.  However, those awards were omitted from his DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a newspaper article and a six-page handwritten statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant  was inducted in St. Louis, Missouri on 3 June 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and his advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Sam Houston, Texas before being transferred to Vietnam on 20 December 1968.

3.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 4th Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment for duty as a medic.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 21 December 1968 and to the pay grade of E-4 on 9 April 1969.

4.  A review of the applicant's official records and the Vietnam Casualty Listing shows that he was wounded on 11 March, 12 June and 20 July 1969.  He was also awarded the Silver Star for gallantry in action on 12 June 1969, an action in which he was wounded.  Additionally, the applicant was awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) in Special Orders Number 113 issued by Headquarters, Americal Division in 1969.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 18 October 1969 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably REFRAD due to hardship.  He had served 1 year, 4 months and 16 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and his marksmanship badges.

6.  On 30 September 2004, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) was prepared to add the applicant's award of the Silver Star to his DD Form 214.  Accordingly, no further action or discussion on this matter is required.

7.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit.  Additionally, he participated in three campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded on three separate occasions.  Although orders for all of those awards are not present in the available records, it is reasonable to presume that he was awarded three Purple Hearts as he claims.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to add those awards to his records at this time.

2.  The evidence of record also reflects that he was awarded the CMB and that award was also omitted from his records at the time of his REFRAD.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to add that award at this time.

3.  Additionally, the evidence of record shows that his unit was awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit.  Additionally, he participated in three campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.

BOARD VOTE:

__x_____  ___x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Purple Heart with two oak leaf clusters, the CMB, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, and to show he is authorized to wear three bronze service stars on his already-awarded VSM.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012004





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012004



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005648

    Original file (20080005648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart and the CMB for his combat duty assignment in Vietnam. While the evidence does show that he was serving as a medic with an infantry company in Vietnam and that he was wounded, that wound was the result of friendly fire and it is the only evidence in his record that documents his service as a medic in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010813

    Original file (20060010813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, and that he was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action which was made a matter of official record, there is no basis to grant award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004258C070206

    Original file (20050004258C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with “V” Device. The evidence of record clearly establishes that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and the ARCOM with “V” Device and that they were omitted from his records at the time of his separation from the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009556C070208

    Original file (20040009556C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant was a qualified infantryman serving in an infantry unit and as such was awarded the CIB. Based on the available evidence, the applicant was awarded the badge that was most appropriate to his qualifications at the time and there is no basis to grant him an additional award of the CMB that was clearly not authorized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019355

    Original file (20090019355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Cambodia in June 1970 and received the Purple Heart; however, it was not reflected on his records at the time of his release from active duty. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002951C070205

    Original file (20060002951C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record does establish that the FSM is entitled to be awarded the KDSM and to have his records corrected to show awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, one silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM, the ROKPUC, and the Marksman Marksmanship Badge with rifle bar. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080677C070215

    Original file (2002080677C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his second award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, that he be issued the second award of the BSM and that he be awarded the Purple Heart. Accordingly, the Board finds that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for his injury on 23 February 1969. b. by correcting his records to show that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device and issuing him a "V" Device for wear on his already awarded BSM; and

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215

    Original file (2002080933C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014533

    Original file (20060014533.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A review of his official records shows no record of the applicant being awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant’s contention that he was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart has been noted; however, the applicant has not provided orders to show two awards of the Purple Heart and the evidence of record contains evidence of only one incident of his being wounded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000683

    Original file (20090000683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that the last four digits of his social security number (SSN) is 5456 and that he was awarded the Silver Star. The applicant states that the last four digits of his SSN on his DD Form 214 are incorrect and that his award of the Silver Star is not reflected on that form. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...