Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011683
Original file (20090011683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011683 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application to upgrade his bad conduct discharge to general or a medical.

2.  The applicant states that the medical evidence provided supports that he had a medical condition with which the military failed to assist him with at the time of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides numerous medical documents from St. John Medical Center.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080017155 on 5 May 2009.

2.  On 9 June 1983, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant to his conviction by a special court-martial on 9 March 1981.

3.  The medical documents provided by the applicant show that he was seen by the St. John Medical Center Behavioral Health Services on the following dates for the following conditions:  3 February 2004, personality disorder; 17 March 2004, paranoia; 14 April 2004, complaint of not sleeping; 25 May 2004, receipt of education materials regarding being diagnosed as bipolar; 7 June 2004, anxiety attacks; 28 October 2004, anxiety; 21 April 2004-30 March 2006, counseling and problem intervention sheet listing updates and intervention counseling; 30 September 2005, diagnosis/assessment; 10 January 2007, diagnosed as chronically mentally ill; 29 March 2007, diagnosed as bipolar; 30 March 2007, diagnosis/assessment; and 30 January 2006, diagnosed as bipolar.

4.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can non longer continue to reasonably perform because of  physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until Soldier is scheduled for separation is an indication that the individual is fit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The medical documents the applicant provided show that he has been seen by health behavioral personnel since 2004 concerning numerous mental issues, such as being diagnosed as bipolar, suffering with anxiety issues, and/or having a personality disorder.

2.  However, these documents are dated 20 years after his discharge from the service.  Absent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed the applicant was physically fit at the time of his March 1981 conviction by special court-martial and at the time of his bad conduct discharge on 9 June 1983.  He has provided no evidence to indicate otherwise.

3.  The applicant has not submitted any additional documentation which shows that the original Board's conclusion that his record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general or an honorable discharge" was in error.

4.  Therefore, the overall merits of the case, including the applicant's medical documents, are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080017155, dated 5 May 2009.



      ______________x___________
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011683



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011683



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02481

    Original file (BC-2006-02481.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was disability discharged with severance pay with a 20% disability rating (30% less 10% Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) factor) on April 7, 1983 for Bipolar Disorder. The orthomolecular psychiatrist in a letter dated November 5, 1980 supported the applicant’s entry into military service, with a caveat that he hadn’t seen the applicant in over two years. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR RALPH J. PRETE Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002462

    Original file (20150002462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Axis II: No diagnosis. e. A review of his military medical records shows there was insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis and that his PEB should be changed from bipolar II disorder to PTSD. Based on the diagnosis of classical bipolar II disorder and the advisory opinion from OTSG, it appears that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis that was unfitting during his active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058709C070421

    Original file (2001058709C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did have a slight hearing problem but there is no evidence to show that his hearing loss was disabling or that it affected his duty performance. The PEB also determined that although the applicant had chronic knee pain, his knee was normal according to x-rays and MRI. The evidence of record supports the determination that the applicant's unfitting condition was properly diagnosed and that his 10 percent disability rating for bipolar disorder and his zero percent rating for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011568

    Original file (20100011568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, he states in 1989 he was medically diagnosed and treated for schizophrenia and now he believes his bad behavior on active duty was the result of this undiagnosed illness. The applicant contends his bad conduct discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge based on the passage of time, his certification as a nurse assistant since his discharge, and his medical diagnosis of schizophrenia. __________X__ ____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07329-02

    Original file (07329-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    supports a diagnosis of a personality disorder. documents (sustained irritability, paranoia, not mixing well with people) are seen in personality disorders, including the one (Avoidant Personality Disorder) with which the Navy psychiatrists diagnosed this patient. A condition * The symptoms documented in the mental health assessments 3. meet DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder -- see Reference The symptoms documented do not meet DSM-IV criteria for (c) either manic, hypomanic, major...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007086

    Original file (20130007086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 June 2007, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder and directed the applicant be issued an honorable discharge. e. [Applicant] reported on his application to correct his record he had been seen by the VA and diagnosed with PTSD, apparently soon after discharge. There is also no indication that, at the time of his discharge, he had a behavioral health condition for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012594

    Original file (20130012594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's request for processing through the PDES. He saw combat stress and was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder on 23 July 2008, but was not started on any medications despite being described as psychotic and manic/hypomanic. The fact that the applicant suffered from mental health issues is not in question; however, the evidence of record shows the applicant was receiving treatment and he consulted with counsel prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017939

    Original file (20130017939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the medical diagnosis on his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings be changed from bipolar disorder to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The applicant contends the medical diagnosis on his PEB Proceedings should be changed from bipolar disorder to PTSD. The applicant has not provided any evidence to substantiate his assertion that the medical diagnosis on his MEB was changed from PTSD to bipolar disorder.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01338

    Original file (PD-2013-01338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On admission the CI reported worsening depression and anxiety symptoms, auditory hallucinations of people calling her name and anger episodes involving hurting herself, though she denied SI or homicidal ideation (HI). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01598

    Original file (PD-2014-01598.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20081107 The CI was also diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and a personality disorder that the PEB “found to be not compensable, although they may be administratively unfitting.” This case is eligible for review under the stipulations of the MH and Review Program as elaborated in the Scope above and, in accordance with VASRD 4.130 (mental disorders), only one disability rating may be provided for MH (except eating disorders) based upon total social and occupational...