Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011022
Original file (20090011022.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    5 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011022 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his pay grade on his initial active duty enlistment contract be corrected from E-2 to E-4.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that when he went to the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) to enlist in the Regular Army (RA) he did not have verification that his rank upon discharge from the Army National Guard was specialist/pay grade E-4.  He states he told his recruiter that his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (NGB Report of Separation and Record of Service) was incorrect and that he had requested a corrected copy.  Upon arrival at the MEPS, without the corrected NGB Form 22, his enlistment contract was prepared with his rank as an E-2 with prior Active and Reserve Component service.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:

	a.  the first page of the DA Form 3286 (Statement of Understanding - RA Enlistment Delay for Applicants with Prior Service or an Existing Military Service Obligation), dated 5 December 2007;

	b.  an NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) with a date of discharge of 29 June 2007;

	c.  Orders 042-841 issued by the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG), dated 11 February 2008;

	d.  copies of DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 January 2007 and 10 June 2007; and 

	e.  a personal statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  With prior active Federal service in the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the TNARNG under the "Try One for the Guard" program for a 1-year enlistment period.  His enlistment contract shows that his grade upon entry into the TNARNG was private/pay grade E-2.

2.  Upon completing his 1-year commitment in the TNARNG, the applicant was honorably discharged on 29 June 2007.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  Orders 240-950 issued by the TNARNG on 28 August 2007 show that the applicant's rank upon discharge was private/pay grade E-2.  Item 5a (Rank) of his NGB Form 22 shows his rank as "PV2," item 5b (Pay Grade) shows his pay grade as "E-2," and item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "2006 06 30" which is the date he enlisted in the TNARNG.

3.  On 5 December 2007, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286 that shows he was scheduled to enlist in the RA on 3 January 2008.  This statement shows that his entry grade as determined in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) would be E-2.  He enlisted for 3 years and 17 weeks.

4.  On 11 February 2008, Orders 042-841 issued by the TNARNG corrected Orders 240-950 to show the applicant's grade upon discharge from the TNARNG was specialist.  Subsequently, the TNARNG issued an NGB Form 22A correcting the applicant's NGB Form 22 to show in item 5a his rank as "SPC" and in item 5b his pay grade as "E-4."

5.  As evidence to support his application, the applicant submitted two DA Forms 4187 that show he was promoted to private first class/pay grade E-3 on 6 January 2007 and was promoted to specialist/pay grade E-4 on 10 June 2007.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Alexandria, VA.  The advisory opinion did not recommend relief for their review showed that the applicant's records indicated that he had been reduced in rank.  Therefore, the advisory opinion concluded that the applicant should not be granted relief if he was reduced for disciplinary reasons.

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 prescribes the eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons, with or without prior service, in the RA, the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and the Army National Guard.  This regulation provides the policies and procedures to process applicants for enlistment in the RA Delayed Entry Program and the USAR Delayed Training Program.  It provides, in pertinent part, for the establishment of enlistment pay grade and terms of enlistment for RA applicants with prior military service.  A former member of the Active Component/Reserve Component who last separated from any component or is a current member of the Reserve Component in pay grade E-4 with not more than 7 years of active Federal service and enlists within 48 months from the date of separation, the enlistment grade will be the same grade held at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted by the TNARNG to the ranks of private first class and specialist during his 1-year enlistment.  For reasons unknown to the Board, the TNARNG discharged the applicant in the rank of private in pay grade E-2.  Within 6 months of his discharge order and 1 month after he entered the Regular Army, the TNARNG issued orders correcting his rank and grade on his initial discharge order and subsequently corrected his NGB Form 22 to show his rank as specialist and his pay grade as E-4.

2.  The preponderance of evidence does not support the advisory opinion from HRC for there is no evidence that the applicant had been reduced for disciplinary reasons by the TNARNG.

3.  Therefore, based on the evidence of record, the applicant's grade at the time of his enlistment on 3 January 2008 should be corrected to show specialist/pay grade E-4.

4.  Based on the applicant's entry grade being changed to specialist/pay 
grade E-4 effective 3 January 2008, he should receive all back pay and allowances due him.



BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) to show in item B (Agreements) that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army beginning in pay grade E-4 on 3 January 2008.  Subsequent to this correction, the applicant's finance records should be corrected to show his entry pay grade as E-4 and he should receive all back pay and allowances due him based on this correction.



      _______ _ X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011022



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011022



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 200309753C070212

    Original file (200309753C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a NGB Form 337 (Oath of Office), dated 15 February 2002; Appointment Orders Number 042-084, dated 11 February 2002; enlisted Discharge Orders Number 042-084, dated 11 February 2002; and NGB Form 62-E (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Office or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the Army National Guard of the United States) dated 15 June 2001. TNARNG Orders Number 042-084,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004802

    Original file (20080004802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) promotion and Federal Recognition effective date be corrected to reflect 17 December 2007 vice 12 March 2008. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Joint Force Headquarters (JFH), Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) Memorandum, dated 6 March 2008; Promotion Checklist; Unit Memorandum, dated 5 December 2007; Personnel Qualification Record; JFH, TNARNG Orders 338-844, dated 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008910

    Original file (20140008910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Approved request for extension beyond age 60 * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * Letter, requesting extension beyond age 60 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Application for Retired Pay * Age 60 Retirement Seminar invitation * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) * Congressional Inquiry * Email exchange * Orders P-12-91234,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007123.

    Original file (20140007123..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) records as follows: * have the TNARNG complete a line of duty (LOD) investigation * have the TNARNG process him through the medical evaluation board/physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB) * medical retirement by reason of disability 2. Chapter 3 provides for various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and which fall below the standards required for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017640

    Original file (20080017640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), Option C, spouse coverage, and entitlement to the RCSBP benefits based on his death prior to age 60. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. Self-authored letter, dated 8 October 2008. b. FSM's prior DD Form 149 (Application for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007563

    Original file (20080007563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in the rank of specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Army National Guard of North Carolina on 24 June 1993. Therefore, in view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct his enlistment contract, dated 8 November 2007, to show he enlisted in the rank and pay grade of SPC/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000581

    Original file (20110000581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests promotion to chief warrant officer five (CW5). He had over 18 years of time in grade (TIG) as a chief warrant officer four (CW4), completed the Warrant Officer Senior Staff Course, selected by the State Adjutant General, and performed CW5 duties as the Detachment Commander, Detachment 25 (DET 25), OSA (Operational Support Airlift), Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG), Smyrna, TN, for 19 months (February 2008 through August 2009). The applicant provides: * a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000396

    Original file (20150000396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * UVP packet * Officer Record Brief * promotion orders, dated 29 July 2013 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), dated 2 August 2013 * email correspondence * sworn statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. TNARNG Orders 210-811, dated 29 July 2013, promoted him to CPT effective 1 July 2013. He completed a UVP packet for the applicant and forwarded it for processing on 25 July 2012. c. On 27 July 2012, he was informed that the applicant had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009466

    Original file (20100009466.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 December 2001, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records corrected his DOR to captain to 18 April 2000. On 1 October 2004, the applicant was discharged from the USAR/Active Guard Reserve in the rank of captain with a DOR of 18 April 2000. The applicant's military records indicate he had no military status between the date of his discharge from the USAR, 1 October 2004, and the date of his appointment in the TNARNG, 17 September 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003319

    Original file (20140003319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NGB's Federal Recognition section stated that his DOR could not be adjusted earlier than 3 January 2013 without the Army Board for Correction of Military Records action due to a change in the way these packets were processed. He provided copies of the following: * SO Number 91 AR, issued by the NGB, on 2 April 2013, initially appointing him in the IAARNG, MSC, as a 2LT, effective 30 June 2012 * NGB Form 78, dated 2 July 2013, which shows he was recommended for promotion to 1LT effective...