Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010790
Original file (20090010790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010790 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that although he received the Army Good Conduct Medal, it is not shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program on 22 October 1976.  He enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 28 January 1977.  The applicant completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36C (Telephone Installer and Lineman, which was subsequently converted to Wire System Installer/Operator).  Following completion of 3 years, 11 months, and 20 days of active duty service, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four/E-4 on 20 January 1981 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) for completion of his military service obligation.

3.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) and item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 show he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar, and the Army Commendation Medal.  Neither of these forms show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There are no entries in his DA Form 2-1 to indicate that his commanders denied him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served honorably during the period 28 January 1977 through 20 January 1981.  His record is void of any evidence that shows he had lost time or that he received nonjudicial punishment or court-martial action.  There is also no evidence of suspension of favorable personnel actions or that his commanders denied him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 28 January 1977 through 27 January 1980 and to correct his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 January 1977 through 27 January 1980,

	b.  adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) to item 13 of his DD Form 214, and

	c.  providing him a document to show these changes.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010790



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010790



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001633

    Original file (20110001633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * NAVPERS (Navy Personnel) 1650/65 (Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards) * Diploma of completion of the Infantry NCO Candidate Course * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Special Orders Number 306 (promotion to sergeant) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008855

    Original file (20130008855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002126

    Original file (20150002126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and to correct his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows he completed a tour in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003435

    Original file (20090003435.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Although there are no orders awarding him the AGCM, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 16 September 1968 through 22 April 1970. Therefore, since he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003257

    Original file (20140003257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the available military records that show he was awarded the AGCM. The evidence of record shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service and his records are void of derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 7 August 1967 to 12 June 1970 and to add this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018879

    Original file (20140018879.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 also shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Purple Heart (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Army Commendation Medal 7. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013505

    Original file (20130013505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000917

    Original file (20080000917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Korea Defense Service Medal. It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004453

    Original file (20140004453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...