Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000917
Original file (20080000917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000917 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mrs. Nancy L. Amos

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. John T. Meixell

Chairperson

Mr. Chester A. Damian

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Korea Defense Service Medal.

2.  The applicant states that the above awards were omitted from his service records.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a copy of his DA Form        20 (Enlisted Qualification Record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 September 1968.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 16B (Hercules Missile Crewman).

3.  The applicant was assigned to Korea from on or about 29 October 1971 to   28 March 1972.

4.  Upon departing Korea for separation processing, the applicant’s commander signed his DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) indicating, in pertinent part, that he recommended the applicant for the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 28 March 1972, in the rank and grade of Specialist Five, E-5, after completing 3 years, 6 months, and 5 days of creditable active service with no lost time.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-14 Rifle), the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-16 Rifle), and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-16 Rifle).

6.  The applicant’s records contain no derogatory information.  His DA Form      20 shows his conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his enlistment.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier’s conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service. 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal to participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  Paragraph 2-13d specifically provides that individuals qualified for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal as follows:  a) service members of the armed forces must have served in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 through a future date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense; b) the area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and the contiguous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water areas; or c) service members must have been mobilized with units or assigned or attached to units operating in the area of eligibility and have been physically deployed in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed over 3 years of creditable active service with no lost time.  His records contain no derogatory information, his conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his service, and his last commander recommended him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It appears he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 September 1968 through 23 September 1971.

2.  The applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of time for award of both the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Korea Defense Service Medal.  Both these awards should be added to his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:

__jtm___  __cad___  __qas__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 September 1968 through 23 September 1971; and

     b.  adding the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Korea Defense Service Medal to his DD Form 214.




__John T. Meixell____
          CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017706

    Original file (20080017706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. Although he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in Korea, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and is therefore entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000951

    Original file (20070000951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Korean Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015163

    Original file (20080015163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's records show there is no record of derogatory or adverse information on file in his military service records or that the applicant was disqualified for award of the GCM. It is authorized for award to members of the armed forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021596

    Original file (20140021596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 January 1970 to 19 January 1973;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011325C070208

    Original file (20040011325C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carol Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his 29 March 1973 DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he completed armor crewman training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, vice the Fort Lewis, Washington location shown, that he completed a basic leadership course at Fort Hood, Texas, and that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009084

    Original file (20100009084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. A review of the applicant's military personnel records reveals that he may be authorized additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214: a. U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Campbell, KY, Special Orders Number 174, dated 11 July 1968, awarded the applicant the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Badge. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011489

    Original file (20120011489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Korea Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Overseas Service Ribbon 2. With respect to the Vietnam Service Medal, although this award is already listed on his DD Form 214, the evidence of record shows he participated in one campaign while serving in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004100

    Original file (20150004100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to: a. show award of the: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for Korea * Basic Missileman’s Badge b. remove the Korean Service Medal (KSM). The NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974. c. The AFEM is authorized for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025029

    Original file (20100025029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Based on the available evidence, the applicant should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....