Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010236
Original file (20090010236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010236 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge.

2.  The applicant states he was in his third term of service and became an alcoholic during his military service.  He claims that he and his buddies got into a fight with German Soldiers and one of the Soldiers was killed.  He claims it was an accident and no one knew who actually killed him.  He further states he was young, foolish, and had a problem with alcohol.  He did not know his actions would cause a death and he has paid for this tragedy since his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that after completing two prior enlistments from 20 February 1943 to 27 November 1945 and 28 November 1945 to 24 March 1947 for which he received honorable discharges, he entered the period of enlistment under review on 7 January 1948.

3.  The applicant's record shows that he attained the rank of corporal on 7 January 1948 and that this is the highest rank he attained during his military service.  It also shows he earned the following awards during his military service tenure:  Asiatic-Pacific Theater Ribbon, Army Good Conduct Medal, American Theater Ribbon, Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp, and World War II Victory Medal.

4.  The applicant's disciplinary history for the enlistment under review shows two separate summary courts-martial (SCM) convictions on 22 March 1948 and 8 June 1948.

5.  On 3 February 1949, a general court-martial (GCM) found the applicant guilty of violating the 93rd Article of War by committing manslaughter and assault on 30 December 1948.  The resultant approved sentence was forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 7 years, and a DD.

6.  On 10 May 1949, the applicant was dishonorably discharged in the grade of recruit under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364 (Enlisted Personnel Discharges - Dishonorable and Bad Conduct) and Headquarters, U.S. Army Europe GCM Order Number 35, dated 10 May 1949.  The WD AGO Form 53-57 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Dishonorable Discharge) issued to the applicant upon his discharge shows he completed a total of 4 years, 11 months, and 24 days of creditable active military service and accrued 160 days of time lost due to confinement.

7.  Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, provided the authority to discharge an enlisted person with a DD pursuant to an approved sentence of a GCM or military commission imposing a DD.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his discharge should be upgraded because he was young and foolish, he became an alcoholic during military service, he did not understand his actions would cause a death, and because he has paid for his actions since his discharge was carefully considered.  However, these factors are not sufficiently mitigating to support granting the requested relief.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed two prior periods of honorable service and had risen to the rank of corporal.  As a result, it was clear he was sufficiently capable to serve satisfactorily had he chosen to do so.  His record reveals a significant disciplinary history during the enlistment under review, which included two SCM convictions.

3.  Further, there is no evidence suggesting the applicant was not guilty of the offenses that led to his GCM conviction and DD.  As a result, given the gravity of the offenses that led to his GCM conviction and DD, his overall record of service, and the passage of time are not sufficiently mitigating to support an upgrade of his discharge at this late date.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x____  __x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010236



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010236



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063615C070421

    Original file (2001063615C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He had completed 1 year, 9 months, and 12 days of active military service. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009109C080410

    Original file (20060009109C080410.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The court sentenced the applicant to 60 days restriction and a forfeiture of $15.00. On 14 July 1948, the applicant was dishonorably discharged, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364, Sentences of Court-Martial. Army Regulation 615-364 (Enlisted Personnel) in effect at the time, provided that an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059990C070421

    Original file (2001059990C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Finally, the SJA found that although it may be questionable if any of the seven accused members fired the shot that killed the soldier, they were nevertheless accountable as principals for acts committed by the members of their group and on 25 January 1947, the convening authority approved the FSM’s sentence, but remitted 3 years of the confinement at hard labor. Further, while the Board does not contest that there were possibly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000936C070205

    Original file (20060000936C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records indicate that the applicant was approved for a waiver of lost time on 31 March 1948, to enlist in the Army. Army Regulation 615-364, then in effect, set forth the conditions under which enlisted personnel could be discharged with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015477

    Original file (20060015477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-57, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Dishonorable Discharge, shows he was inducted on 9 June 1943 and entered active duty on the same date at the age of 20 years and 9 months. Her brother was sick with Rheumatic Fever and was admitted into the Government hospital. Medical-related records do show the FSM had contracted Rheumatic Fever in 1941, years before he was inducted into the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052520C070420

    Original file (2001052520C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his rank on his 21 September 1951 DD Form 214 is incorrect; that he was activated as a sergeant; that he served as a sergeant; and that he was discharged as a sergeant on 24 March 1946. On 24 March 1946, the applicant was discharged from the AUS in the rank of sergeant. On 24 March 1949, the applicant was discharged from the ERC in the rank of Corporal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004576C070205

    Original file (20060004576C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that clemency be granted in the form of an honorable discharge or a pardon. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to grant service member’s pardons for convictions by a general or special court-martial. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records has no authority to grant the applicant’s request for a pardon.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002085638C070215

    Original file (2002085638C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation states that an individual separated under this regulation will be furnished an honorable or general discharge. The Board considered the applicant's request to change his discharge to Army Regulation 615-365 or Army Regulation 615-360. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reason and authority for separation issued to him was in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007871

    Original file (20140007871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the type of discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. His record of service included three summary court-martial convictions, two special court-martial convictions, and 404 days of lost time. Therefore, his record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgraded discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071187C070402

    Original file (2002071187C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His DD Form 214 indicates that he had 3 years and 28 days of creditable service and 655 days of lost time. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: