| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was a good soldier and he proudly served in the United States Army from 1946-1949, to include 1 year in Korea without incident. He adds that he was young at the time of his actions and he believes that the discharge that he received was unjust. He also believes that he has paid for his mistakes and has been a good man with no convictions on his record since the military. He submits a copy of his BCD Certificate and a statement in support of his request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
At 17 years of age, he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in Hawaii on 26 July 1946 for a period of 3 years and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 063 (Crane Operator). On 28 August 1946, he arrived in the United States where he completed basic and advanced individual training. On 22 January 1947, he was assigned to Korea.
There is no evidence of any indiscipline when the applicant was assigned to Korea. On 5 November 1947, he departed Korea for the United States and was assigned to Camp Stoneman, California, on 3 December 1947. On 28 January 1948, he was reassigned to Camp Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii.
On 14 May 1948, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of
being absent without leave (AWOL) from his unit from 1-29 March 1948 and for feloniously taking and using for his own benefit, without consent of the owner, a motor vehicle (a Willys Jeep) of a value of more than $50.00 with intent to temporarily deprive the owner of his property on 27 March 1948. He was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for 1 year, and a dishonorable discharge.
On 9 July 1948, the finding of guilty of the felonious taking and use of a vehicle was disapproved. Only so much of the sentence that provided for confinement at hard labor for 87 days and for forfeiture of $45.00 pay per month for 3 months was approved and duly executed.
On 19 August 1948, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of
disobeying a lawful order given by a commissioned officer on 5 August 1948. He was sentenced to forfeiture of $40.00 pay and to confinement at hard labor for 1 month.
On 8 October 1948, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of
being AWOL from his unit from 30 August-1 October 1948. He was sentenced to forfeiture of $50.00 pay per month for 2 months and to confinement at hard labor for 3 months.
On 18 February 1949, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of
feloniously taking and using for his own benefit, without consent of the owner, a motor vehicle (a 1936 Plymouth Coupe) of a value of more than $50.00 with the intent to temporarily deprive the owner of his property on 27 December 1948.
He was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowances, to confinement at hard labor for 2 years, and to be discharged with a BCD.
On 5 May 1949, the convening authority approved the adjudged sentence.
On 16 May 1949, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364 with a BCD. He had completed 1 year, 9 months, and 12 days of active military service. He also had 373 days lost time due to being AWOL and in confinement. The applicant was denied clemency; however, on 31 October 1949, he was released from military confinement and placed on parole until 17 August 1950.
Army Regulation 615-364 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct and provides that a soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge (DD) or BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. The Board has taken into consideration the applicant’s contention that he was young at the time he committed misconduct. The applicant's declaration of parental consent to enlist is not a matter of record, however, he would have been required to provide such a declaration of parental consent at the time of his enlistment in order to meet entrance qualification standards. Further, the Board found no evidence that he was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military service obligation.
4. The available records contain evidence that indicates the applicant was a habitual offender who continuously committed acts of misconduct. He was given several chances to serve out his enlistment with an honorable discharge, but he continued to commit serious offenses, to include wrongful appropriation of privately-owned vehicles. He has established no basis for clemency.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__WTM__ __CLG__ ___RKS _ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063615 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020402 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (BCD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19490516 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR615-364 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A60.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000936C070205
The available records indicate that the applicant was approved for a waiver of lost time on 31 March 1948, to enlist in the Army. Army Regulation 615-364, then in effect, set forth the conditions under which enlisted personnel could be discharged with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087643C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was released from confinement and returned to duty on 27 April 1946, went AWOL on 20 May 1946 from Camp Atterbury and returned on 6 November 1946. On 31 July 2002 the National Personnel Records Center prepared a Certification of Military Service showing that the applicant was a member of the Regular Army from 10 July 1941 until 3 January 1946 and that he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009109C080410
The court sentenced the applicant to 60 days restriction and a forfeiture of $15.00. On 14 July 1948, the applicant was dishonorably discharged, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364, Sentences of Court-Martial. Army Regulation 615-364 (Enlisted Personnel) in effect at the time, provided that an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058963C070421
The applicant states, through counsel, that he and three fellow soldiers were convicted by a general court-martial on 28 March 1948. The applicant's counsel states that this Board has the authority to set aside court-martial convictions under the old Articles of War (convictions prior to 5 May 1950). All four soldiers were tried together by a General Court-Martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059990C070421
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Finally, the SJA found that although it may be questionable if any of the seven accused members fired the shot that killed the soldier, they were nevertheless accountable as principals for acts committed by the members of their group and on 25 January 1947, the convening authority approved the FSM’s sentence, but remitted 3 years of the confinement at hard labor. Further, while the Board does not contest that there were possibly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007871
His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the type of discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. His record of service included three summary court-martial convictions, two special court-martial convictions, and 404 days of lost time. Therefore, his record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgraded discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074235C070403
After reviewing the applicant's service record and hearing testimony from his chain of command, the board recommended that the applicant be He had completed 2 years, 10 months, and 20 days of creditable active Federal service on the enlistment under review and he had lost time due to being in confinement. On 23 August 1965, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge after a records review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010236
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. As a result, given the gravity of the offenses that led to his GCM conviction and DD, his overall record of service, and the passage of time are not sufficiently mitigating to support an upgrade of his discharge at this late date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009455
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms that both the FSM and his mother provided the recruiter a copy of the FSMs Certificate of Baptism to confirm that he was at least 17 years of age at the time of his 1 December 1947 enlistment in the Army, as evidenced by the 29 November 1947 notarized affidavit on file. In addition, the FSM was found to be mentally and physically fit for military service by...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02117 ADDENDUM
On 3 November 1948, the applicant was tried and found guilty by a special court-martial for being AWOL from on/or about 9 September 1948 to on/or about 27 September 1948. In support of his request, he submits a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-59, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Undesirable Discharge; and, a letter of support from his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there...