Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009849
Original file (20090009849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        5 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009849 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (correctly known as the Bronze Star Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster).

2.  The applicant states that he was "red file" for action across the demilitarized zone line and he thinks that this action is unfair.  He indicates that he is filing for post-traumatic stress disorder disability and he needs documentation for all he went through.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 August 1969 for a period of 2 years.  He served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam from 16 January 1970 to 22 December 1970 and was released from active duty on 13 August 1971.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Bronze Star Medal as an authorized award.

4.  There are no orders for the Bronze Star Medal in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.  The regulation also provides, in pertinent part, that the bronze oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the Bronze Star Medal.

8.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

9.  A DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) must be submitted (a copy of which will be provided to the applicant).  The applicant's unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request.  The request must be submitted through a Member of Congress to the Secretary of the Army at the following agency: U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Personnel Service Support Division, 200 Stovall Street, Room 3S67, Alexandria, VA  22332-0405. The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rest with the requestor.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders for the Bronze Star Medal in the available records.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base any award of the Bronze Star Medal in this case.  

2.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X_____  ___X____ DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009849



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009849



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011755

    Original file (20110011755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * he would like to determine if he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal per Colonel M____'s recommendation, dated 23 May 1964 * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) is not complete * awards were received subsequent to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004320

    Original file (20120004320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: a. His military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016624

    Original file (20130016624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence suggesting his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008189

    Original file (20100008189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommendation for decoration, dated 4 December 1970, shows the applicant was recommended for the award of the BSM from 26 March 1970 to 12 December 1970. The orders show the ARCOM (First Oak Leaf Cluster) was awarded for meritorious service during the period March 1970 to December 1970, the same period cited on the applicant's recommendation for the award of the BSM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020332

    Original file (20140020332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. There is no evidence in the available record that shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009339

    Original file (20110009339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with a Silver Oak Leaf Cluster and a combat service ribbon(s). Approved designated campaigns are: * Defense of Saudi Arabia (2 August 1990 to 16 January 1991) * Liberation and Defense of Kuwait (17 January to 11 April 1991) * Cease-Fire Campaign (12 April 1991 to 30 November 1995) c. The Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013187

    Original file (20100013187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 January 1968, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 13E (Field Artillery Operations and Intelligence Assistant). The record does not contain any evidence that the applicant was recommended for award of the Air Medal or the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013485

    Original file (20100013485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that he be awarded the Soldier's Medal and that his records be corrected to show award of two Meritorious Unit Commendations. On 24 May 1967, the applicant's unit commander recommended him for award of the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period 7 July 1966 through 6 July 1967.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011942

    Original file (20080011942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show the second award of the Purple Heart (referred to as First Oak Leaf Cluster) for wounds he received on 23 September 1968, and the Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, the evidence presented is insufficient to award the Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster). Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to award the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010659

    Original file (20080010659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded a number of awards, to include Air Medals and the Aircraft Crewman Badge, but his records do not contain any Bronze Star Medal Orders. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Medal (1st through 10th Oak Leaf Clusters), and the Republic of Vietnam...