Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009268
Original file (20090009268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009268 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his characterization of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and that his narrative reason for separation be changed.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) prior to his enlistment, and that these factors contributed to him not adapting to military life and performing his duties effectively as a Soldier.

3.  Despite indicating that he provided medical records, the applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 May 1984.  His DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant authenticated that he had never been a patient, whether or not formally committed, in any institution primarily devoted to the treatment of mental, nervous, emotional, psychological, or personality disorders.  His records also show that he was a high school graduate.

3.  On 13 June 1984, while in his second week of basic training, the applicant's commanding officer recommended that he be separated under the provisions of chapter 11 (Entry-Level Status Performance and Conduct [Trainee Discharge Program]), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel).  His commander indicated that the applicant had not maintained a sufficiently high enough level of motivation and self-discipline to overcome his aptitude deficiencies and displayed a limited capacity for learning and a lack of ability to follow instructions.  He also stated that every possible effort had been made to train him in basic training skills, but that he continually performed below standards.

4.  Also on 13 June 1984, the applicant acknowledged notification of his proposed separation and that, if approved, he would receive an entry-level separation with his service characterized as uncharacterized.  He waived his rights, which included consulting with counsel, making statements in his own behalf, requesting copies of the documents supporting his proposed separation, and requesting a separation physical.

5.  On 20 June 1984, the proper separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed that he be issued an uncharacterized entry-level separation.  On 22 June 1984, the applicant was discharged accordingly after completing only 29 days of active duty.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows an entry of "entry-level status performance and conduct."

6.  There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry-level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The separation policy applied to Soldiers who could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline.  The regulation required uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided, in pertinent part, guidance for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  For item 24, an entry-of "honorable," "under honorable conditions (general)," "under other than honorable conditions," "bad conduct," "dishonorable," or "uncharacterized" would be entered.  An entry of "uncharacterized" was appropriate for Soldiers in an entry-level status.  Entry-level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

9.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his characterization of service should be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and that his narrative reason for separation should be changed.

2.  The applicant's contention that he was diagnosed with ADHD, bipolar disorder, and OCD prior to his enlistment was noted; however, there is no evidence in his military records and the applicant failed to provide any evidence to support his contention.

3.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 for entry-level performance and conduct.  As he only had 29 days of active military service, he was in an entry-level status at the time of his discharge.  As a result, his DD Form 214 shows that service was properly characterized as uncharacterized and that his narrative reason for separation is also properly indicated.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009268



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009268



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019768

    Original file (20110019768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time, and the medical condition does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020907

    Original file (20140020907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he requested a discharge upgrade twice and was denied * he just got his medical records 3. The psychiatrist recommended consideration of the applicant for administrative action as deemed appropriate by his command, to include separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11. Although medical evidence provided by the applicant shows he was being evaluated/pending an MEB for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000570

    Original file (20130000570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On or about 28 January 1985, he was released from confinement and returned to his basic training unit. On 8 April 1985, his immediate commander informed him of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003386

    Original file (20130003386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 October 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003386 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029908

    Original file (20100029908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicated he understood that if his separation were approved he would receive an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The separation authority approved his entry-level separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, on 14 March 1984. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to change the type of discharge he received.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003962

    Original file (20140003962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the character of service reflected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be upgraded from "uncharacterized" to "honorable." It also contains a 2nd Endorsement, dated 12 September 1991, subject: Proposed Discharge Action under the provisions of Trainee Discharge Program, which shows her discharge case had been reviewed and was approved under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020634

    Original file (20090020634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records do not show that the applicant ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the character of his service within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012262

    Original file (AR20060012262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 24 October 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (she was diagnosed as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006577

    Original file (20080006577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was advised that he could be separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) if he had less than 180 days of active service. On 4 January 1983, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 11 (entry-level separation) by reason of entry level status performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 10...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999023674

    Original file (1999023674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999023674 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990407 A0100 Character...