Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020634
Original file (20090020634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  10 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020634 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the character of his service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable.

2.  The applicant states:

* He was "listed" as being allergic to grass
* His condition greatly hampered his ability to achieve his desired rank before reaching his retirement age
* When he was in the National Guard, he served under honorable conditions
* He did not receive any nonjudicial punishments or any other disciplinary actions while he was in the National Guard or while he was in the Regular Army (RA)
* He was promoted while he was on active duty
* Since he was released "under general discharge conditions," he is not eligible for benefits

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 

Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  With prior enlisted service in the Idaho Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve under the Delayed Entry Program on 27 November 1984.  He enlisted in the RA for 3 years on 13 March 1985, in the pay grade of E-1.

3.  The available records show that he was advanced to the pay grade of E-2 on 2 June 1985.

4.  The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge are not on file.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged in the pay grade of E-1 on 3 September 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, due to unsatisfactory performance and his service was uncharacterized.  He had 5 months and 21 days of net active service this period.

5.  The available records do not show that the applicant ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the character of his service within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  The regulation in effect at the time provided for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation, or self discipline for military service, or they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The separation policy applied to Soldiers who could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.  The regulation required an uncharacterized description of service for separation.



7.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case.

8.  Entry-level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active service after a service break of more than 92 days of active service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no error in the character of service assigned to the applicant.  His DD Form 214 appropriately reflects the character of his service as uncharacterized.

2.  His contentions have been considered.  However, his contentions are not supported by the evidence of record.  His records show he was in an entry-level status at the time he was discharged from the Army for unsatisfactory performance.  His contentions are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant characterizing his service.  He had less than 180 days of continuous active duty service and in accordance with the applicable regulation, his service was uncharacterized.

3.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows at the time he was separated from the Army he was issued a general discharge.  

4.  The applicant has failed to show error or injustice in the fact that his service was uncharacterized.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020634



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020634



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000570

    Original file (20130000570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On or about 28 January 1985, he was released from confinement and returned to his basic training unit. On 8 April 1985, his immediate commander informed him of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023636

    Original file (20110023636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1991, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with uncharacterized service. This chapter applied to Soldiers who were in an entry-level status and completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty before the date of the initiation of separation action. Chapter 2 contains item-by-item preparation instructions for the DD Form 214 as follows: * item 6 shows the completion date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003962

    Original file (20140003962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the character of service reflected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be upgraded from "uncharacterized" to "honorable." It also contains a 2nd Endorsement, dated 12 September 1991, subject: Proposed Discharge Action under the provisions of Trainee Discharge Program, which shows her discharge case had been reviewed and was approved under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016403

    Original file (20090016403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from uncharacterized to general under honorable conditions or honorable. On 5 January 1990, the separation authority waived the rehabilitation requirements, approved the applicant's discharge from the Army for unsatisfactory performance, and directed he receive an entry-level separation with an uncharacterized service. When separated within the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020238

    Original file (20130020238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 March 1991 to show his character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. b. he is currently an Army Reservist serving honorably and has served on Regular Army (RA) active duty and as an Army National Guardsman. The available evidence shows he was discharged for entry level performance and conduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004129

    Original file (20110004129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. On 7 March 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge. His separation code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013748

    Original file (20090013748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 September 1985, the separation authority waived the rehabilitation requirements and approved the applicant's discharge from the Army under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Without a PEB, the applicant could not have been issued a medical discharge or separated for physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003386

    Original file (20130003386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 October 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003386 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008686

    Original file (20140008686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 April 1986, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) for fraudulent enlistment and he advised the applicant of his rights. On 9 April 1986, the applicant's commander initiated separation action against him by reason of fraudulent enlistment. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019558

    Original file (20140019558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his uncharacterized discharge be upgraded to honorable. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he had completed 1 year, 4 months, and 9 days of active duty service. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) effective 15 July 2004 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.