Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009264
Original file (20090009264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009264 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, through a retired Army major employed by the State of Tennessee Department of Veterans Affairs, requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant essentially states that a "buddy" statement from a fellow Soldier verifies that his unit came under enemy fire and that fire was returned.

3.  The applicant provides an undated "buddy" statement in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080019063, on 12 March 2009.

2.  In the previous ABCMR proceedings, the applicant's request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge was denied because although the applicant was awarded an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and served in an infantry position with Company D, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division from on or about 15 August 1965 to on or about 23 November 1965, there was no evidence that he participated in active ground combat during the time he served with this unit.  There were also no orders in his military records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.
3.  The applicant provided an undated "buddy" statement from a former fellow Soldier who essentially stated that he arrived in Vietnam the same day as the applicant and was assigned to the same platoon, and that as darkness set on the first day they began receiving enemy fire, and that people were being shot and killed.  The author of this statement also claims that he was exposed to the atrocities of war on a daily basis, and that he spent a lot of time with the applicant in reconnaissance.

4.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

5  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Battle or campaign participation credit alone is not sufficient; the unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

6.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence provided by the applicant in the form of a "buddy" statement from a former fellow Soldier in support of his claim for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge was carefully considered.  However, absent any other corroborating evidence of record, this statement alone, more than 43 years after the fact, does not show by a preponderance of evidence that the applicant met the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  Although the applicant possessed and served in an infantry MOS with an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size during his service in Vietnam, there is no evidence in his military records, he failed to provide evidence which conclusively shows that his unit engaged in active ground combat and that he actively participated in such ground combat.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080019063, dated 12 March 2009.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States, and especially during his two and a half months of service in Vietnam.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009264



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009264



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009112

    Original file (20080009112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that he thought that the Combat Infantryman Badge was already in his military records, and that a first sergeant in Okinawa in 1969 indicated to him that he was authorized to wear the Combat Infantryman Badge. He further stated that he thought that the Combat Infantryman Badge was already in his military records, and that a first sergeant in Okinawa in 1969 indicated to him that he was authorized to wear the Combat Infantryman Badge. Although the applicant possessed and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006268

    Original file (20070006268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position with C Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division before being reassigned to an aviation unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007785

    Original file (20120007785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits an Army buddy statement, dated 26 September 2011, from a fellow Soldier at the time in question who attests: * He served with the applicant in Vietnam from February 1968 to February 1969 * They were in the same company and platoon for the entire year * He (fellow Soldier) received the CIB * Their company performed numerous combat assaults in Vietnam * The applicant spent well over 300 days in the field/jungle during their tour * The applicant earned the CIB within the first 4 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002091

    Original file (20110002091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he did not receive the Combat Medical Badge because he departed Vietnam unexpectedly on emergency leave in late June 1969. The applicant's military personnel record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the Combat Medical Badge. However, there are no orders or any other Army records that show the applicant was awarded the Combat Medical Badge, or that he was recommended for the badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009941

    Original file (20060009941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017483

    Original file (20140017483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 40 (Wounds) shows he was wounded in action as a result of hostile enemy action on 28 January 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016904

    Original file (20140016904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicantÂ’s military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant provides a letter of support which states, in effect: * the writer served in Vietnam with the applicant * they were both assigned to Troop D, 2nd Platoon, 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) * when he arrived in Vietnam he was assigned to a 106 millimeter recoilless rifle jeep as a loader * the gunner in his jeep was the applicant *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007239

    Original file (20080007239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Medical Badge. However, USARV Regulation 672-1 did provide detailed guidance on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge which is awarded to infantry personnel based essentially the same criteria for award of the Combat Medical Badge to medical aid personnel assigned to infantry units. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded a medical MOS following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006155

    Original file (20080006155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With respect to award of the Combat Medical Badge, the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a medical MOS following completion of training. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Combat Medical Badge for exceptionally valorous actions; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011454

    Original file (20120011454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he should have been awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. d. A review of SGT MG's record showed he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge for "participation in ground combat operations under enemy hostile fire to liberate Iraq in support on OIF" while assigned to Company B, 1st Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division on 7 March 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...