Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009039
Original file (20090009039.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  17 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009039 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant notes the Board previously stated there was no proof that he had been in combat or lived the infantryman’s life.  However, he states except for the time he was in the hospital he “walked in the same jungle, the same rice paddies, the same rubber plantations and shared the same fox holes” as the rest of his squad.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of item 38 (Record of Assignments) from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), a listing of various “missions” summaries from the Vietnam Era, and 10 photographs taken in Vietnam on which the applicant identified himself or fellow unit members. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080007369 on 16 September 2008.

2.  The listing of various missions summaries from the Vietnam Era and the 10 photographs are considered new evidence not previously seen by the Board and as such warrant consideration.  The copy of item 38 from the applicant’s DA Form 20 was previously available to the Board.
3.  As noted in the Board’s original proceedings, the applicant did perform duties as a rifleman with the 503rd Infantry while in Vietnam from 25 July 1966 to 
17 August 1966 when he assumed duties as a messenger.  He returned to duties as a rifleman on 18 March 1967 and served in that capacity until he departed Vietnam in June 1967.  However, the applicant’s available records indicate he was never awarded an infantry MOS (military occupational specialty) and held an MOS of 94B (cook) throughout the duration of his enlistment.

4.  The list of mission summaries provided by the applicant in support of his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge contains names and dates and very brief summaries of unit actions, some of which specifically identified the 503rd Infantry as participants but none of which included any individual’s name.  The applicant annotated that he was “here” beside 9 of the mission summaries.

5.  The photographs provided by the applicant show Soldiers in various field conditions in Vietnam.  On the photographs the applicant has identified individuals in the photographs.  On one photograph he notes that one of the individuals in the picture was the platoon leader who put him in for the Combat Infantryman Badge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s performance as a rifleman in Vietnam with an infantry unit is not in question.  However, one of the primary requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge is that the individual holds an infantry MOS.  In this particular case, although the applicant may have performed infantry duties, he was never awarded an infantry MOS and as such was not eligible for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.








BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080007369, dated 16 September 2008.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009039





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009039



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003928

    Original file (20110003928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge 2. c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant's MOS was 94B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014455

    Original file (20100014455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94A (Cook Helper) or 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding his and his former platoon sergeants' sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018965

    Original file (20090018965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The available evidence does not show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000859

    Original file (20100000859.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following documents: * listing of 9th Infantry Division Soldiers killed in action (KIA) by unit * listing of the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, Honor Roll * internet printout of the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, operations in Vietnam * by-name listing of Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry's KIA Soldiers and their listing on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial * several photographs of Soldiers of the 1st Platoon, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020187

    Original file (20100020187.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100020187 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There are no orders or any other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File showing he was awarded or recommended for the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003494

    Original file (20150003494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C. Mr. C provided a newspaper article that reported he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1967 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division. This met the requirement of being assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller unit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007546

    Original file (20120007546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's served in Vietnam with an infantry unit as a rifleman and gunner. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge for service on 26 February 1966 * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007369

    Original file (20080007369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge during his service in the Republic of Vietnam but it was not entered on his DD Form 214. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence clearly shows that the applicant performed the duties of an infantryman and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011147

    Original file (20070011147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 20 October 1966 to 18 October 1968, based on completion of a period of qualifying military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding...