Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008535
Original file (20090008535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008535 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the separation code and narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 August 2007 to show he was medically discharged.

2.  The applicant states that his separation code on his DD Form 214 is listed as "LBK" [completion of required active duty service].  However, a year later he was separated from the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) with a medical discharge.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; a memorandum from the WIARNG, Deputy State Surgeon, dated 16 May 2008; a memorandum from the WIARNG, Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel/G-1, dated 4 June 2008; and a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Account Statement, dated 5 March 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant had prior active duty service.  He enlisted in the WIARNG on 
28 March 2003.  On 19 April 2006, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  On 9 August 2007, he was honorably released from active duty and returned to the WIARNG.



2.  Item 26 (Separation Code) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "LBK" and item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows the entry 
"completion of required active service."  There are no documents in the 
applicant's records that indicate he could not perform his military duties or that he was referred to the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) during his active duty service.

3.  On 3 May 2008, the WIARNG State Surgeon reviewed the applicant’s medical records for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depressive disorder, lower back pain, arthritis, knee and ankle pain, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and severe hearing loss.  From that review, it was determined the applicant did not meet retention standards in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation).  The applicant had the right to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD) proceeding, but he waived that right and was processed for medical discharge.

4.  By memorandum from the WIARNG, dated 4 June 2008, the applicant was notified of his medical discharge for failure to meet retention standards.  

5.  Departments of the Army and Air Force, Joint Force Headquarters Wisconsin, WIARNG, Madison, WI, Orders Number 199-508, dated 17 July 2008, honorably discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a reserve of the Army, effective 4 July 2008.

6.  The applicant's National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 4 July 2008 shows that he was discharged under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-35l(8) with an honorable discharge, by reason of medically unfit for retention, after completing 9 years and 26 days of qualifying service for pay.  

7.  The applicant's military medical records are not available for review.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 3 provides that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  To be found unfit by reason of physical disability, individuals must be unable to perform the duties of his/her grade, rank, or rating.

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 states that when a commander believes that a Soldier of his or her command is unable to perform duties because of physical 

disability, the commander will refer the Soldier to the responsible medical treatment facility.  It also states that commanders of medical treatment facilities who are treating Soldiers may also initiate action to evaluate the Soldier’s physical ability to perform the duties.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  (emphasis added)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be changed to a medical discharge.  However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever unable to perform his military duties while on active duty.  It appears that at the time of his release from active duty he was medically fit to perform his duties.  

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was found unfit to perform his military duties by the WIARNG and he was issued a medical discharge, well after his release from active duty.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X__  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008535



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008535



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022838

    Original file (20110022838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he received a medical retirement. His record does not contain any medical documentation or medical records from WRAMC showing his physicians determined he was unfit to return to military duty. There is no evidence in his service records and he provides insufficient evidence to show that at the time of his release from active duty the medical authorities at WRAMC found him physically unfit to perform the duties require of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003863

    Original file (20140003863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests consideration for medical retirement (placement on the permanent disability retired list) vice separation with "severance pay" (i.e., separation pay and transfer to the Retired Reserve). The applicant provides: * Two previous applications to the Board * Two previous response letters from the Army Review Boards Agency * Congressional correspondence * Email from his battalion commander * Statement from another Soldier * VA rating decision, dated 21 September 2011 * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003497

    Original file (20090003497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 March 2008, by letter, the Adjutant General, WIARNG, notified the applicant that a review of his records showed the 24 September 1991 memorandum from the Director of Personnel and Administration was incorrect as it showed he was being discharged in accordance with paragraph 3-12a (amputation) of Army Regulation 40-501 and that it should have showed paragraph 3-12b (upper extremity - range of motion). The advisory official further stated that NGB personnel were able to locate: a. a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022151

    Original file (20120022151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 February 2010 * DD Form 2813 (Department of Defense Active Duty/Reserve Forces Dental Examination), dated 13 November 2008 * Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) memorandum, dated 4 December 2008 * pathology laboratory results, dated 12 December 2008 * Medical Operational Data System (MODS) – Individual Medical Readiness Record, dated 12 December 2008 * MODS –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016332

    Original file (20060016332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was medically retired. In this case the applicant has only completed 3 years in the WIARNG. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant served on active duty for 18 years and was separated with an SSB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007737

    Original file (20120007737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and he be transferred to the Retired Reserve or retired by reason of permanent disability. A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence to suggest that the applicant was not deemed medically fit for separation or retention at the time of release from active duty in 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015370

    Original file (20110015370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter, dated 10 June 2011, from TAG, WIARNG, who supports his request for a non-regular retirement citing the applicant's medical condition as the reason for non-compliance with the law that required the last 6 years to be in a Reserve Component in order to qualify for non-regular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020209

    Original file (20120020209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 November 2006 to show: * award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, Joint Meritorious Unit Award, and the Humanitarian Service Medal * his current address * the dates of his service from his Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) call-up in 2009 and 2010 2. However, the DD Form 214 is a record of service at the time of release from active duty. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006472

    Original file (20110006472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he has 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement at age 60. His record contains a memorandum for the WIARNG G-1-Enlisted from the WIARNG Health System Services, dated 3 November 2005, which states the physical evaluation board's (PEB) determination that the applicant is unfit for duty was forwarded to that office for disposition on 29 August 2005 and requests processing of a medical discharge with an effective date of 14 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004101

    Original file (20110004101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his date of separation as 21 June 2010. The applicant's DD Form 214 correctly shows the period he served on active duty as ending on 21 March 2010. The applicant has provided no evidence that he remained in an active duty status after 21 March 2010.