Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008438
Original file (20090008438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090008438 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 March 1971 to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairman).

2.  The applicant states	, in effect, that MOS 44E (Machinist) on his DD Form 214 should be replaced with MOS 67N.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 August 1969.  He successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded MOS 67N.  

3.  Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant's DA Form 
20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant was awarded primary MOS 44E (Machinist) and secondary MOS 67N effective 16 March 1971.  

4.  On 25 March 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 for the ending period 25 March 1971 shows that he was promoted to the rank and grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 effective 16 March 1971.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) shows the entry "44E20 Machinist.” There is no evidence in his records that show MOS 44E was withdrawn prior to his discharge.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized preparation of the DD Form 214.  For item 22a it stated, enter primary MOS code number and title.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded MOS 67N and that he served in MOS 67N for majority of his military service.  However, his DA Form 
20 shows he was awarded primary MOS 44E and secondary MOS 67N effective 
16 March 1971 and his DD Form 214 shows his date of rank to SP5 as 16 March 1971.  It appears that the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-5 in MOS 44E prior to his separation from the military.  That promotion would have required him to be awarded primary MOS 44E.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect, at the time specifically stated to enter primary MOS in item 23a of the DD Form 214.  Therefore, MOS 44E is correctly entered on the applicant's DD Form 214 with no previsions for adding a secondary MOS.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008438





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008438



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006726

    Original file (20090006726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BSM and CIB are individual awards, not authorized unit awards. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015804C080407

    Original file (20070015804C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012199

    Original file (20080012199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 67N instead of 67P. The DD Form 214, Item 23a, Specialty Number & Title, has MOS 67P30, light transport helicopter mechanic, entered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106322C070208

    Original file (04106322C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that his last name is “Schellenberg” vice “Schellenburg.” He also asks that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and that his separation document show that he held specialty 11B (infantryman) at the time of his separation. The soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090814C070212

    Original file (2003090814C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record and separation document (DD Form 214) to show that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist) and that he is entitled to receive the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). The applicant's military records do not contain orders or documents that indicate that he was ever recommended for or awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Further, the supporting documents, while showing the applicant may have served or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013219

    Original file (20080013219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 17 March 1972, Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) to show the military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police). Item 23a also shows the applicant was awarded MOS 62B on 18 May 1971. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in MOS 95B during his period of active duty; however, there is insufficient evidence to show he was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018797

    Original file (20090018797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 8 February 1972; copies of Special Orders Number 87, 136, and 229, issued by Headquarters, 3d Brigade (Separate), 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), on 5 July 1971, 23 August 1971, and 24 November 1971, respectively; a copy of the 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion Promotion Standing List, dated 30 November 1971; a copy of Special Orders Number 39, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, on 8 February 1972;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000584

    Original file (20080000584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214; a statement from a former comrade who served with the applicant as his door gunner, along with that individual’s Air Medal and Army Commendation Medal orders; and a letter from a former helicopter pilot who remembers the applicant serving as a flight crew member, along with that individual’s DD Form 214. Flight records are not available. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000810

    Original file (20120000810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015427

    Original file (20100015427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record does not indicate the following: * he was promoted above the rank of SP5 * he qualified with the M-16 rifle or he was awarded a marksmanship badge for qualification with M-16 rifle * he completed a 5-week training course in Germany 10. His request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed a 5-week course in Germany is acknowledged.